scholarly journals PKA, PHO and stress response pathways regulate the expression of UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase through Msn2/4 in budding yeast

FEBS Letters ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 589 (18) ◽  
pp. 2409-2416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dae-Gwan Yi ◽  
Won-Ki Huh
2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (29) ◽  
pp. 17031-17040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allegra Terhorst ◽  
Arzu Sandikci ◽  
Abigail Keller ◽  
Charles A. Whittaker ◽  
Maitreya J. Dunham ◽  
...  

Aneuploidy, a condition characterized by whole chromosome gains and losses, is often associated with significant cellular stress and decreased fitness. However, how cells respond to the aneuploid state has remained controversial. In aneuploid budding yeast, two opposing gene-expression patterns have been reported: the “environmental stress response” (ESR) and the “common aneuploidy gene-expression” (CAGE) signature, in which many ESR genes are oppositely regulated. Here, we investigate this controversy. We show that the CAGE signature is not an aneuploidy-specific gene-expression signature but the result of normalizing the gene-expression profile of actively proliferating aneuploid cells to that of euploid cells grown into stationary phase. Because growth into stationary phase is among the strongest inducers of the ESR, the ESR in aneuploid cells was masked when stationary phase euploid cells were used for normalization in transcriptomic studies. When exponentially growing euploid cells are used in gene-expression comparisons with aneuploid cells, the CAGE signature is no longer evident in aneuploid cells. Instead, aneuploid cells exhibit the ESR. We further show that the ESR causes selective ribosome loss in aneuploid cells, providing an explanation for the decreased cellular density of aneuploid cells. We conclude that aneuploid budding yeast cells mount the ESR, rather than the CAGE signature, in response to aneuploidy-induced cellular stresses, resulting in selective ribosome loss. We propose that the ESR serves two purposes in aneuploid cells: protecting cells from aneuploidy-induced cellular stresses and preventing excessive cellular enlargement during slowed cell cycles by down-regulating translation capacity.


2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. e1003077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Hye Kyong Kweon ◽  
Christian Shively ◽  
Anuj Kumar ◽  
Philip C. Andrews

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 368-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spike D.L. Postnikoff ◽  
Jay E. Johnson ◽  
Jessica K. Tyler

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xia Wang ◽  
Pidong Li ◽  
Ryan N. Gutenkunst

AbstractDynamic control of gene expression is crucial for cellular adaptation to environmental challenges. mRNA secondary structure is known to be associated with mRNA and protein abundance, but little is known about how mRNA secondary structure affects gene expression dynamics. We report a genome-wide computational analysis of mRNA secondary structure, codon usage, and gene expression in budding yeast. We show that mRNA secondary structure combined with codon optimality regulates gene expression in multiple ways, from transcription to mRNA stability to translation. Moreover, we find that the effect of mRNA secondary structure on mRNA abundance is primarily mediated by transcription, not mRNA stability. Notably, genes with low mRNA secondary structure were substantially enriched for functions relevant to stress response, acting in the mitochondrion, endoplasmic reticulum, and ribosome. On the other hand, genes with high mRNA secondary structure were enriched for functions relevant to cellular maintenance, including macromolecular metabolism and biosynthesis. Our results suggest that mRNA secondary structure affects gene expression through coordination of multiple stages in protein biogenesis, with important consequences for stress response. The coupling of transcription to mRNA stability to translation makes concerted changes in mRNA and protein abundance possible and may amplify the effect of regulation to make quick responses to environmental variations.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2009 (12) ◽  
pp. 1544-1552
Author(s):  
Min MIAO ◽  
Hong-Ping CAO ◽  
Yan ZHONG ◽  
Jun LIU ◽  
Yi-Hui WANG ◽  
...  

Genes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Cabrera ◽  
Laylah C. Welch ◽  
Meaghan R. Robinson ◽  
Candyce M. Sturgeon ◽  
Mackenzie M. Crow ◽  
...  

The ability of yeast to survive freezing and thawing is most frequently considered in the context of cryopreservation, a practical step in both industrial and research applications of these organisms. However, it also relates to an evolved ability to withstand freeze–thaw stress that is integrated with a larger network of survival responses. These responses vary between different strains and species of yeast according to the environments to which they are adapted, and the basis of this adaptation appears to be both conditioned and genetic in origin. This review article briefly touches upon common yeast cryopreservation methods and describes in detail what is known about the biochemical and genetic determinants of cell viability following freeze–thaw stress. While we focus on the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, in which the freeze–thaw stress response is best understood, we also highlight the emerging diversity of yeast freeze–thaw responses as a manifestation of biodiversity among these organisms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document