A Comparison of Clinical Pregnancy Rates and Multiple Gestation Rate with Two Versus Three Embryos Transferred with Pairs Matched for Embryo Quality

2010 ◽  
Vol 93 (5) ◽  
pp. S9-S9
Author(s):  
E. Borman ◽  
J.H. Check
Author(s):  
Mahnaz Yavangi ◽  
Nesa Varmaghani ◽  
Azar Pirdehghan ◽  
Maryam Varmaghani ◽  
Mohammad Faryadras

Background: Endometrial scratch injury is considered controversial in increasing the success rate of assisted reproductive technology. Objective: To compare the pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing intrauterine insemination with and without an endometrial scratch. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 150 women referred to the Fatemieh Hospital, Hamadan, Iran who were candidates for IUI between December 2017 and December 2018 were randomly assigned into two groups (n = 75/each) with or without an endometrial scratch (as case and control groups, respectively). Women in both groups were in proper and identical protocol for IUI. Chemical and clinical pregnancies, abortion, and live birth rate, also pregnancy complications were compared between the groups. Results: Chemical and clinical pregnancy rates were higher in the case than the control group (p = 0.25, p = 0.54, respectively). In the case group, the abortion and multiple gestation rates were 14.3% and 4.3%, respectively, while it was 5% in the control group (p = 0.60, p = 0.54 respectively). The endometrium thickness on day 21 was higher in the case group than the control (p = 0.01). Conclusion: Endometrial scratching in intrauterine insemination women is not associated with an increase in both clinical and clinical pregnancy rates, however, studies with a larger sample size are recommended to evaluate this intervention. Key words: Pregnancy infertility, Women, Endometrial injury, Pregnancy, Intrauterine insemination.


2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 465-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orhan Bukulmez ◽  
Khurram S Rehman ◽  
Martin Langley ◽  
Bruce R Carr ◽  
Anna C Nackley ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Funda Gode ◽  
Suleyman Akarsu ◽  
Zeliha Gunnur Dikmen ◽  
Burcu Tamer ◽  
Ahmet Zeki Isik

<p><strong>Objective:</strong> To evaluate the associations among levels of vitamins A, E, D, and B6 in follicular fluid embryo morphokinetics and quality, and clinical pregnancy rates.</p><p><strong>Study Design:</strong> A total of 58 patients with unexplained infertility admitted to the in vitro fertilisation (IVF) centre of Izmir Medical Park Hospital were included in this prospective clinical study. For each patient, vitamin levels were assayed using high-performance liquid chromatography. After intracytoplasmic sperm injection, for each oocyte, the relationships between each vitamin and subsequent embryo quality, embryo morphokinetics, and clinical pregnancy rates were investigated. Embryos were classified as grade A, B, C, or D according to morphokinetic parameters using t5-t2 and t5-t3 (cc3). </p><p><strong>Results:</strong> There was no significant correlation between embryo morphokinetic parameters (tpnf, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 and t8) and follicular fluid vitamin (A, B6, D and E) levels (p&gt;0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between t5optimal and follicular fluid vitamin A levels (p&lt;0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between cc2optimal and follicular fluid vitamin B6 levels (p&lt;0.05). Levels of vitamins A and B6 were significantly higher in grade A and B embryos than in grade C and D embryos. There were no significant relationships between vitamins E or D and embryo quality or between any vitamin and clinical pregnancy rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> High levels of vitamins A and B6 in follicular fluid are significantly associated with high-quality embryos and optimal morphokinetics. However, none of the vitamins considered showed a significant relationship with clinical pregnancy rates.</p>


2013 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 402-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria J. de los Santos ◽  
Pilar Gámiz ◽  
Carmela Albert ◽  
Arancha Galán ◽  
Thamara Viloria ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. S349 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.M. Kolibianakis ◽  
K. Loutradi ◽  
C.A. Venetis ◽  
E.G. Papanikolaou ◽  
T.B. Tarlatzi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document