The predictive value of antral follicle count remains unchanged across the menstrual cycle

2011 ◽  
Vol 96 (6) ◽  
pp. 1514-1518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luk Rombauts ◽  
Joseph L. Onwude ◽  
Hong W. Chew ◽  
Beverley J. Vollenhoven
2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Razafintsalama ◽  
M Bah ◽  
G Amand ◽  
L Vienet-Lègue ◽  
C Pietin-Vialle ◽  
...  

Abstract Study question Does antral follicle count (AFC) retains its predictive value for ovarian response to stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) throughout the whole menstrual cycle? Summary answer AFC is strongly correlated to anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) and highly predictive of good ovarian response whatever the day of cycle the ultrasound is performed. What is known already Usually performed in the early follicular phase (at day 2–3 of the menstrual cycle), AFC and AMH are the most accurate markers of ovarian reserve. They are routinely used to predict ovarian response to ovarian stimulation for IVF and eventually to individualize the gonadotropin starting dose. Study design, size, duration Retrospective cohort study performed between January, 2017 and December, 2019. Participants/materials, setting, methods 410 consecutive women aged 20 to 42 years were included. Random AFC (r-AFC) was performed during the fertility workup whatever the day of their menstrual cycle was: early follicular phase i.e. day 1 to day 6 (eFP-AFC), mid follicular phase i.e. day 7 to 12 (mFP-AFC) and luteal phase i.e. day 13 or after (LP-AFC). A second AFC was performed before the start of the stimulation (SD1-AFC). AMH was measured in the early follicular phase. Main results and the role of chance Random AFC (r-AFC) was correlated to AMH (r = 0.692; p < 0.001), SD1-AFC (r = 0.756; p < 0.001) and number of oocytes retrieved (r = 0.491; p < 0.001). When regarding AFC depending on the cycle day group, the correlation with AMH was significantly higher for the LP-AFC, (LP-AFC) (r = 0.853) than for the eFP-AFC (r = 0.657; p < 0.001) and for the mFP-AFC (r = 0.668). The correlation with SD1-AFC was similar regardless of the time of performance of r-AFC (r = 0.739, 0.783, 0.733, respectively for eFP, mFP and LP-AFC). Moreover, the ROC analysis showed the same predictive value for good ovarian response (more than 6 oocytes retrieved) for the eFP-AFC, mFP-AFC and LP-AFC (AUC 0.73, 0.75 and 0.84 respectively) as well as for AMH and SD1-AFC (AUC 0.74 and 0.74, respectively). Limitations, reasons for caution This is a retrospective analysis, however data were prospectively collected and the method for ultrasound acquisition of AFC was standardized. Wider implications of the findings: The absence of significant variation of AFC across the menstrual cycle allows to its random performance. Ultrasound performed besides early follicular phase discloses informations on ovaries, the uterus and the endometrium. It is more comfortable and convenient for women and physicians by limiting targeted appointment during menstruation and reiterated examination. Trial registration number Not applicable


Author(s):  
Julia Schiffner ◽  
Judith Roos ◽  
David Broomhead ◽  
Joseph van Helden ◽  
Erhard Godehardt ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground:The study aim was to validate Beckman Coulter’s fully automated Access Immunoassay System (BC Access assay) for anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and compare it with Beckman Coulter’s Modified Manual Generation II assay (BC Mod Gen II), with regard to cycle AMH fluctuations and antral follicle counts.Methods:During one complete menstrual cycle, transvaginal ultrasound was performed on regularly menstruating women (n=39; 18–40years) every 2 days until the dominant ovarian follicle reached 16mm, then daily until observed ovulation; blood samples were collected throughout the cycle. Number and size of antral follicles was determined and AMH levels measured using both assays.Results:AMH levels measured by the BC Access assay vary over ovulatory menstrual cycles, with a statistically significant pre-ovulatory decrease from –5 to +2 days around objective ovulation. Mean luteal AMH levels were significantly lower (–7.99%) than mean follicular levels but increased again towards the end of the luteal phase. Antral follicle count can be estimated from AMH (ng/mL, BC Access assay) concentrations on any follicular phase day. BC Access assay-obtained AMH values are considerably lower compared with the BC Mod Gen II assay (–19% on average); conversion equation: AMH BC Access (ng/mL)=0.85 [AMH BC Mod Gen II (ng/mL)]Conclusions:AMH levels vary throughout the cycle, independently of assay utilised. A formula can be used to convert BC Access assay-obtained AMH levels to BC Mod Gen II values. The number of antral follicles can be consistently estimated from pre-ovulatory AMH levels using either assay.


2019 ◽  
Vol 79 (07) ◽  
pp. 731-737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umit Gorkem ◽  
Cihan Togrul

Abstract Introduction There are numerous conflicting studies which have addressed the question whether the measurement of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentrations should be done at a certain time during the menstrual cycle. We aimed to investigate AMH fluctuations during the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle and to determine whether AMH variations, if present, might influence the clinical utility of ovarian reserve markers. Materials and Methods A total of 257 infertile women eligible for inclusion were categorized into three groups based on their total antral follicle count: 1. hypo-response group (< 7 follicles, n = 66), 2. normo-response group (7 – 19 follicles, n = 98), and 3. hyper-response group (> 19 follicles, n = 93). Results Mean follicular AMH levels were elevated compared to levels in the luteal phase in all response groups (p < 0.001). There were significant and strong positive correlations between follicular and luteal AMH levels in all response groups (Spearmanʼs r = 0.822, r = 0.836, and r = 0.899, respectively; p < 0.001 for all groups). Fisherʼs Z-test comparisons of these correlations in all response groups demonstrated that there was no statistically significant difference (Z = 0.277, Z = − 1.001, and Z = − 1.425, respectively; p < 0.001). Conclusion We found that serum AMH levels in the follicular phase were higher than those in the luteal phase in all three response groups. In current practice, fluctuations in serum AMH concentrations are not large enough to alter the timing of AMH measurements during the menstrual cycle. The issue is important for the assessment of ovarian reserve in infertile women with AMH levels near to the cut-off value.


2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (7) ◽  
pp. 1644-1647
Author(s):  
Irina Pacu ◽  
Cringu Ionescu ◽  
Simona Vladareanu ◽  
Mihai Banacu ◽  
Adrian Neacsu ◽  
...  

The ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is one of the major complications which occurs as a result of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in the assisted human reproduction. There are several factors including age, body mass index (BMI), plasma estradiol level, the anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) level and the antral follicle count (AFC), which can be used to identify the cases with high risk for this complication. The purpose of the study is to establish the predictive value of AMH for the development of OHSS before COS as well as its association with the plasma estradiol level during stimulation. The study group included 155 COS cycles using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocols, and analyzed the predictive value of the mentioned parameters for OHSS. The serum AMH level is superior to age and BMI for identification of patients with high risk for OHSS before starting the ovulation stimulation, and the cut-off level is 3.78ng/mlLwith 91.1% sensibility and 85.2% specificity.


2012 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. S26
Author(s):  
R.P. Gada ◽  
P. Leonard ◽  
A. Grzenda ◽  
A. Asante ◽  
Z.M. Tabbaa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document