scholarly journals Affect of GnRH agonist trigger followed by low dose hCG on reproductive outcome in at risk OHSS patients: a comparison between fresh and frozen transfer

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (3) ◽  
pp. e199
Author(s):  
K.D. Nayar ◽  
A. Mohan ◽  
S. Chulet ◽  
R. Ahuja ◽  
G. Kant ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Muthukumar ◽  
TK Aleyamma ◽  
Sumi Thomas

ABSTRACT Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, which is a key component of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment, can be excessive in certain cases and can lead to massive cystic enlargement of the ovaries and biochemical changes, leading to ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Traditionally, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) has been used as ovulation trigger in ART cycles but its sustained luteotrophic effect is associated with an increased risk of OHSS in high-risk patients. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist trigger can be used as an alternative to hCG in GnRH antagonist downregulated cycles. However, the use of GnRH agonist was associated with a lower pregnancy rate due to deficient luteal phase, and hence, use of low-dose hCG to rescue the deficient luteal phase has been used. Various studies showed that using lowdose hCG did not increase the risk of OHSS even in high-risk patients. Here, we present a case report of severe early-onset OHSS following GnRH agonist trigger with low-dose hCG. How to cite this article Thomas S, Kamath MS, Muthukumar K, Aleyamma TK. Severe Early-onset Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome following Use of GnRH Agonist Trigger along with Low-dose hCG. Int J Infertil Fetal Med 2016;7(2):68-72.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 228
Author(s):  
Andrea Roberto Carosso ◽  
Stefano Canosa ◽  
Gianluca Gennarelli ◽  
Marta Sestero ◽  
Bernadette Evangelisti ◽  
...  

The segmentation of the in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle, consisting of the freezing of all embryos and the postponement of embryo transfer (ET), has become popular in recent years, with the main purpose of preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in patients with high response to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). Indeed cycle segmentation (CS), especially when coupled to a GnRH-agonist trigger, was shown to reduce the incidence of OHSS in high-risk patients. However, CS increases the economic costs and the work amount for IVF laboratories. An alternative strategy is to perform a fresh ET in association with intensive luteal phase pharmacological support, able to overcome the negative effects of the GnRH-agonist trigger on the luteal phase and on endometrial receptivity. In order to compare these two strategies, we performed a retrospective, real-life cohort study including 240 non-polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCO) women with expected high responsiveness to COS (AMH >2.5 ng/mL), who received either fresh ET plus 100 IU daily human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) as luteal support (FRESH group, n = 133), or cycle segmentation with freezing of all embryos and postponed ET (CS group, n = 107). The primary outcomes were: implantation rate (IR), live birth rate (LBR) after the first ET, and incidence of OHSS. Overall, significantly higher IR and LBR were observed in the CS group than in the FRESH group (42.9% vs. 27.8%, p < 0.05 and 32.7% vs. 19.5%, p < 0.05, respectively); the superiority of CS strategy was particularly evident when 16–19 oocytes were retrieved (LBR 42.2% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.01). Mild OHSS appeared with the same incidence in the two groups, whereas moderate and severe OHSS forms were observed only in the FRESH group (1.5% and 0.8%, respectively). In conclusion, in non-PCO women, high responders submitted to COS with the GnRH-antagonist protocol and GnRH-agonist trigger, CS strategy was associated with higher IR and LBR than the strategy including fresh ET followed by luteal phase support with a low daily hCG dose. CS appears to be advisable, especially when >15 oocytes are retrieved.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document