HCG Trigger After Failed GnRH Agonist Trigger Resulted in Two Consecutive Live Births: A Case Report

Background: Failed gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist trigger with no oocyte retrieved during aspiration of several follicles is a rare but recurrent situation that can be rescued by the termination of the aspiration procedure, retriggering by human chorion gonadotropin (hCG), and repeated oocyte pickup 36 h later. Failed GnRH agonist trigger is frustrating and unsatisfactory, and fertility doctors must be aware of possible hCG retriggering and retained opportunity for successful cycle outcome.Objective: In this case report, we present a woman who experienced failed GnRH agonist trigger and rescue hCG retrigger followed by two consecutive live births after frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfers.Methods: A case report.Results: Two healthy children were born in 2018 and 2020, respectively as a result of controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF, failed GnRH agonist trigger followed by hCG re-trigger, and successful retrieval of 25 oocytes.Conclusion: Retriggering with hCG after failed GnRH agonist trigger can result in consecutive live births, and such knowledge can prevent cycle cancellation and patient discouragement. Knowledge on retriggering with hCG and consecutive live births after failed GnRH agonist trigger can prevent cycle cancellation and patient discouragement.

Clinical Pregnancy and Incidence of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome in High Ovarian Responders Receiving Different Doses of hCG Supplementation in a GnRH-Agonist Trigger Protocol

Objective. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a side effect of the exogenous human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) hormones used to trigger oocyte maturation. High ovarian responders represent a population with a higher risk of OHSS and are characterized by an exaggerated response to gonadotropin administration. In this study, we compared clinical pregnancy and incidence of OHSS in high ovarian responders receiving different doses of hCG supplementation in a GnRH-agonist trigger protocol. Methods. A total of 205 high ovarian responders who were to undergo in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles were recruited and randomly assigned to receive different doses of hCG supplementation in a GnRH-agonist trigger protocol: GnRH-a (n = 42), GnRH-a + 1000 IU hCG (n = 49), GnRH-a + 2000 IU hCG (n = 54), and GnRH-a + 3000 IU hCG (n = 60) groups. Results. The GnRH-a + 1000 IU hCG, GnRH-a + 2000 IU hCG, and GnRH-a + 3000 IU hCG groups had more oocytes retrieved, embryos, high-quality embryos, and a higher rate of high-quality embryos than the GnRH-a group ( p < 0.05 ). The GnRH-a + 1000 IU hCG group demonstrated more oocytes retrieved, embryos, high-quality embryos, and a higher rate of high-quality embryos than the GnRH-a + 2000 IU hCG and GnRH-a + 3000 IU hCG groups ( p < 0.05 ). No moderate and severe OHSS cases occurred in the GnRH-a and GnRH-a + 1000 IU hCG groups. The incidence rate of moderate and severe OHSS was remarkably lower in the GnRH-a group and GnRH-a + 1000 IU hCG groups than in the GnRH-a + 2000 IU hCG and GnRH-a + 3000 IU hCG groups ( p < 0.05 ). The GnRH-a + 1000 IU hCG, GnRH-a + 2000 IU hCG, and GnRH-a + 3000 IU hCG groups had a higher clinical pregnancy rate than the GnRH-a group, showing no significant difference ( p > 0.05 ). The GnRH-a + 1000 IU hCG, GnRH-a + 2000 IU hCG, and GnRH-a + 3000 IU hCG groups had a lower abortion rate than the GnRH-a group ( p < 0.05 ). Conclusion. Based on the data obtained from this prospective study, we recommend 1000 IU hCG supplementation in a GnRH-agonist trigger protocol for high ovarian responders during IVF/ICSI cycles considering a higher rate of high-quality embryos, a lower incidence rate of moderate and severe OHSS, and a lower abortion rate.

GnRH-Agonist Ovulation Trigger in Patients Undergoing Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation for IVF with Stop GnRH-Agonist Combined with Multidose GnRH-Antagonist Protocol

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study aimed to characterize those patients undergoing the stop gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist combined with multidose GnRH-antagonist protocol, with suboptimal response to GnRH-agonist trigger in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. <b><i>Design:</i></b> This is a cohort study. <b><i>Setting:</i></b> The study was conducted in a university hospital. <b><i>Patients:</i></b> All consecutive women admitted to our IVF unit from February 2020 through November 2020 who reached the ovum pick-up stage were reviewed. <b><i>Interventions:</i></b> Triggering final oocyte maturation by GnRH-ag alone (GnRH-ag trigger group), or combined with hCG (dual trigger group), in patients undergoing the stop GnRH-agonist combined with multidose GnRH-antagonist protocol was performed. <b><i>Main Outcome Measure:</i></b> The main outcome measure was LH level 12 h after the trigger. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Five out of the 32 patients (15.6%) demonstrated suboptimal response as reflected by LH levels &#x3c;15 IU/L 12 h after GnRH-agonist trigger. Moreover, while no differences were observed in oocyte recovery rate, maturity, or embryo quality between the different study groups (GnRH-ag trigger and dual trigger groups), those achieving a suboptimal response to the GnRH-agonist trigger (post-trigger LH &#x3c;15 mIU/mL) demonstrated significantly higher number of follicles and peak estradiol levels at the day of trigger, compared to those with optimal response (post-trigger LH &#x3e;15 mIU/mL). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The stop GnRH-agonist combined with GnRH-antagonist protocol enables the substitution of hCG with GnRH-ag for final oocyte maturation. However, caution should be taken in high responders, where the dual trigger with small doses of hCG (1,000–1,500 IU) should be considered, aiming to avoid suboptimal response (post-trigger LH levels &#x3c;15 IU/L).

P–667 Dydrogesterone supplementation in cycles triggered with lone GnRH agonist for final oocyte maturation resulted in an acceptable pregnancy rate

Study question Can luteal oral Dydrogesterone (Duphaston) supplementation in an antagonist cycle after a lone GnRH agonist trigger rescue the luteal phase, allowing the possibility to peruse with fresh embryo transfer? Summary answer Functionality of the luteal phase in an antagonist cycle after a lone GnRH agonist trigger can be restored by adding Duphaston to conventional luteal support. What is known already Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is dramatically reduced when using antagonist cycle with lone GnRH agonist trigger before ovum pick up. This trigger induces short luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) peaks, associated with reduced progesterone and estrogen levels during the luteal phase. They cause an inadequate luteal phase and a significantly reduced implantation rate leading to a freeze all practice in those cycles. Study design, size, duration A retrospective cohort study. The study group (n = 123) included women that underwent in vitro fertilization cycles from January 2017 to May 2020. Patients received a GnRH-antagonist with a lone GnRH-agonist trigger due to imminent OSHH. The control group (n = 374) included patients under 35 years old that, during the same time period, underwent a standard antagonist protocol with a dual trigger of a GnRH-agonist and hCG. Participants/materials, setting, methods Study patients were given Dydrogesterone (Duphaston) in addition to micronized progesterone vaginal pills (Utrogestan) for luteal support (Duphaston group). Controls were treated conventionally with Utrogestan for luteal phase support (hCG group). The outcomes measured were pregnancy rate and OHSS events. Main results and the role of chance Our study was the first to evaluate the addition of Duphaston to standard luteal phase support in an antagonist cycle triggered by a lone GnRH agonist before a fresh embryo transfer. The mean number of oocytes retrieved and estradiol plasma levels were significantly higher in the Duphaston group than in the hCG group (16.9 ±7.7 vs. 10.8 ± 5.3 and 11658 ± 5280 pmol/L vs. 6048 ± 3059 pmol/L, respectively). The fertilization rate was comparable between the two groups. The mean number of embryos transferred and the clinical pregnancy rate were also comparable between groups (1.5 ± 0.6 vs 1.5 ± 0.5 and 46.3% vs 40.9%, respectively). No OHSS event was reported in either group. Limitations, reasons for caution This retrospective study may carry an inherent selection and information bias, derived from medical record coding. An additional limitation was the choice of physician for the lone GnRH trigger, which may have introduced a selection bias and another potential caveat was the relatively small sample size of our study groups. Wider implications of the findings: The addition of Duphaston to conventional luteal support could effectively salvage the luteal phase without increasing the risk for OHSS. This enables, to peruse in those cycle, with fresh embryo transfer, avoiding the need to freeze all the embryos and postponed embryo transfer. Leading to lower psychological burden and costs. Trial registration number 0632–20-HMO

P–761 Can modified luteal support in fresh cycle after agonist trigger “rescue” the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) in high responders

Study question Can modified luteal support in fresh cycle “rescue” the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) in high responders who receive agonist trigger? Summary answer Live birth rate in high responders who had agonist trigger in fresh cycle was significantly reduced despite modified luteal support. What is known already Previous studies, including small randomised controlled trials, claimed that good live birth rate could be achieved at fresh transfer in “high responders” who had GnRHa trigger with modified luteal phase support. However, majority of these studies exclude the true high responders (patients with 20 and above oocytes) and average number of collected eggs reported in many of these studies in the range of 9 to 12. The data on outcome of fresh transfer in true high responders is very limited. Study design, size, duration A prospective observational study was conducted in 407 patients, aged 23–42 years who were expected to be at risk of high response (AFC&gt;18, AMH&gt;20 pmol/l) undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation between 2014–2019 triggered either with HCG or GnRH agonist. Live birth rate (LBR) in a fresh and subsequent 3 frozen transfers were compared in groups with different triggers and freeze all. Participants/materials, setting, methods Patients were stimulated in short antagonist protocol. The trigger was chosen based on the background characteristics, peak oestradiol and clinician discretion. Triggering was achieved either with 0.5 mg buserelin (GnRHa) 0.5mgin 230 patients (A) or with 250 mcg of hCG(H) in 177 patients. Modified luteal support included vaginal progesterone, oral oestrogen and 1500 iu of hCG on the day of egg retrieval. The later was omitted with more than 20 oocytes. Main results and the role of chance The mean age, AFC, number of previous cycles, number of embryos transferred were 33.3, 22.4, 0.26 and 1.2 respectively and did not have significant difference between different triggers. Whereas AMH (53 pmol/l (A) vs 43.1 pmol/l (H), P = 0.003), peak oestradiol (15140.74 (A) vs 9738.59 (H), P = 5.59X10–14), and number of oocytes collected (21 vs.17, P = 5.63X10–7) were significantly higher in GnRHa group. Seventeen patients in buserelin group had elective freeze all. Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS) rate was 3.9% in buserelin group (more then half of these cases had a bolus of hCG at egg collection; most were mild/moderate). On the other hand, hCG group had 2.5% of OHSS (all severe). Live birth rate in fresh cycle was 31% in hCG and 21% in GnRHa groups. If freeze all was undertaken in fresh cycle after GnRHa trigger, then LBR in the first frozen cycle of this group was 53% (P = 0.003, fresh vs frozen GnRHa group). CLBR was not different between GnRHa and hCG groups (51%). However, this was significantly lower than CLBR in GnRHa trigger freeze all group 76% (P = 0.03) Limitations, reasons for caution The limitation of this study is its non-randomised nature. However, since it is one of the biggest studies for high responders it has a power to minimise bias by adjusting for multiple variables. Wider implications of the findings: Proceeding with fresh transfer in high responders after GnRHa trigger with modified luteal support not only maintains the risk of OHSS (equivalent to hCG group) but also significantly impairs the LBR not compensated even after 3 subsequent frozen embryo transfers. Therefore, freeze-all approach should be preferred in this group. Trial registration number NA

Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with GnRH agonist trigger during the COVID pandemic: lessons learned from an unusual case

Background: Injectable gonadotropins stimulate multi-follicular recruitment and allows retrieval of multiple oocytes for assisted reproduction. The widespread utilization of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) to induce oocyte maturation for oocyte retrieval has nearly eliminated the risk of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and only a few cases have been reported in the literature. The rarity of severe OHSS may lead to the mistaken conclusion that gonadotropin stimulation can be safely administered with limited monitoring, even in high-risk patients. We present an unusual case of a woman with limited monitoring due to the COVID pandemic who developed severe OHSS before GnRH agonist trigger and oocyte. Case Presentation: A 29-year-old nulliparous woman with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) initiated ovarian stimulation for oocyte retrieval. She had a robust initial response, and developed worsening abdominal pain, bloating, nausea, vomiting, and decreased appetite before retrieval. GnRH agonist was given to “trigger ovulation and retrieval scheduled due to the low reported incidence of severe OHSS. Symptoms progressed, and on the morning of retrieval, ultrasound demonstrated bilaterally enlarged ovaries >10cm and 48 oocytes were retrieved for a planned cryo-all cycle. She was hospitalized on the day of retrieval for severe OHSS and had two large-volume paracenteses. She was stable and discharged home by day 5, and symptoms markedly improved with the onset of menses. She has an ongoing pregnancy from her first frozen embryo transfer. Conclusion: We add a rare case of severe OHSS with a GnRHa trigger and cryo-all protocol with the onset of symptoms before GnRH agonist administration. Although rare, severe OHSS may still occur with a GnRHa trigger, and caution is needed when an initial robust response is identified. Here we also provide an opportunity to review the important patient risk factors for the development of OHSS and measures to reduce the risk in excessive responders.