scholarly journals ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INCREASES EUPLOIDY RATE AND CLINICAL PREGNANCY RATE IN SINGLE THAWED EUPLOID EMBRYO TRANSFER AND DECREASES THE RATE OF MOSAIC Results

2021 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. e392-e393
Author(s):  
Rian N. Salasin ◽  
Robin Skory ◽  
Nathanael C. Koelper ◽  
Dara Berger
2015 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. e10
Author(s):  
O.O. Barash ◽  
K.A. Ivani ◽  
S.P. Willman ◽  
C. MacKenzie ◽  
S.C. Lefko ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Neumann ◽  
G Griesinger

Abstract Study question Does the administration of an oxytocin-receptor antagonist around time of embryo transfer in IVF impact the likelihood to achieve a clinical pregnancy? Summary answer Administration of oxytocin-receptor antagonists around embryo transfer increases the likelihood of clinical pregnancy achievement. What is known already Uterine contractions occurring around time of embryo transfer have been described as one possible mechanism of failure of implantation of an embryo in the context of in-vitro fertilization (IVF). Hence the utilization of oxytocin-receptor antagonists was evaluated in randomized clinical trials (RCT) as a therapeutic approach. The compound Atosiban was studied by most RCTs (summarized in Huang et al. 2017). Recently further studies have become available which also investigated the novel agents Barusiban and Nolasiban. This systematic review collates the evidence of all drugs functioning as oxytocin-receptor antagonists which have been investigated in RCTs on IVF treatment so far. Study design, size, duration Multiple literature databases were searched for randomized controlled studies comparing the outcome of IVF cycles with administration of an oxytocin-receptor antagonist in the time period before, during or after embryo transfer versus placebo or nil in IVF patients. Meta-analyses were performed using standard procedures in the software program RevMan v.5.4. All analyses were done per randomized patient, wherever feasible. Participants/materials, setting, methods Eleven RCTs were identified and included in the meta-analysis. Seven utilized the agent Atosiban, one Barusiban and three Nolasiban. These drugs were administered either intravenously, subcutaneously or orally. The patient populations were heterogenous (fresh cycle, frozen-thawed cycle, endometriosis, implantation failure or general IVF-population) between trials. Only four studies reported live birth rates whereas all RCTs reported clinical pregnancy rate. Main results and the role of chance Administration of an oxytocin-receptor antagonist around embryo transfer increases the likelihood of live birth (relative risk: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.99-1.22, p = 0.06, I2=31%, four RCTs, n = 2,510). Accordingly, the ongoing pregnancy rate is increased (relative risk: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.03-1.26, p = 0.01, I2=18%, four RCTs, n = 2,510) as well as the clinical pregnancy rate (relative risk: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.13-1.51, p = 0.0002, I2=61%, eleven RCTs, n = 3,611) by administration of an oxytocin-receptor antagonist. The risk to suffer a miscarriage, however, is not influenced by an oxytocin-receptor antagonist administration (relative risk: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.72-1.12, p = 0.35, I2=0%, seven RCTs, n = 2,936). The risk of multiple pregnancy is not different between groups (relative risk: 1.05 95% CI: 0.81-1.36, p = 0.73, I2=5%, seven RCTs, n = 3,014) as is the risk for an ectopic pregnancy (relative risk: 0.88 95% CI: 0.43-1.8, p = 0.73, I2=0%, four RCTs, n = 2,714). Limitations, reasons for caution Methodological rigor is heterogenous between trials and some of the evidence is of poor quality. Evaluation of included studies is still ongoing and queries are pending. Additionally, there is heterogeneity between patient populations and definition of outcomes; only four RCTs report ongoing pregnancies and live births. Wider implications of the findings The administration of oxytocin-receptor antagonists around embryo transfer increases the pregnancy rate and may be a promising approach to enhance the likelihood to achieve a live birth per embryo transfer. Trial registration number n.a.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P C Jindal ◽  
M Singh

Abstract Study question Does GCSF by intrauterine route leads to better result in the treatment of thin endometrium as compared to GCSF by the subcutaneous route, in IVF-ICSI Cycles? Summary answer Yes, GCSF by intrauterine route leads to better result in the treatment of thin endometrium as compared to subcutaneous-GCSF, in ART Cycles? What is known already GCSF, is a member of the colony stimulating factor family of cytokines and growth factors. GCSF receptors are expressed in high concentration on dominant follicle, particularly at preovulatory stage.The endometrium also shows an increased expression of these receptors. GCSF concentration rises in the follicular fluid at the same time. Serum levels of GCSF are found to be in direct correlation with levels of GCSF in follicular fluid. Serum levels increase progressively from the day the embryo-transfer to the day of implantation. GCSF has been found to be beneficial in patients with thin endometrium and recurrent implantation failure. Study design, size, duration This was a RCT conducted between 2018–2019. 30 patients with thin endometrium were enrolled in each group. In either group, GCSF was given if endometrium was less than 7mm on day 14, maximum of two doses were administered. Patients undergoing frozen embryo transfer were recruited in the study, after meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary outcome measured was increase in endometrium thickness and the secondary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate and abortion-rate. Participants/materials, setting, methods 60 patients with thin endometrium were randomly divided into two groups. Group A: Inj. GCSF (300 mcg/1 ml) subcutaneously on Day 14 onwards alternate days for two doses. Group B: Inj. GCSF (300 mcg/1 ml) instilled slowly into the uterine cavity using an intrauterine insemination (IUI) catheter under USG guidance. Endometrial thickness was assessed after 48 h. If endometrial thickness was found to be < 7 mm, a second infusion of GCSF was carried out. Main results and the role of chance In the subcutaneous group (group-A) the mean endometrial thickness before GCSF injection was 5.8 ± 0.6 mm and, after injection it increased to 6.9 ± 0.4 mm. Similarly, in the intrauterine group (group-B) the mean endometrial thickness before GCSF was 5.9 ± 0.7 which increased to a mean of 7.9 ± 0.5 after GCSF instillation. The difference between endometrial thickness before and after intrauterine infusion of GCSF was more than that in the subcutaneous group. In group-A, 08 patients conceived out of 30 patients ( clinical pregnancy rate 26.6%) and in group B 11 conceived out of 30 patients in whom GCSF was instilled intrauterine (pregnancy rate 36.6%). Thus, there was a difference in the clinical pregnancy rate in the two groups, the intrauterine group yielding a higher clinical pregnancy rate, but it was not statistically significant. Because of the thin endometrium, we found an abortion rate of 25% (2/8) in the subcutaneous-GCSF group, and an abortion rate of 18% (2/11) in the intrauterine GCSF group. Limitations, reasons for caution There are few potential limitations because of the small sample size. Confounders such as obesity, smoking and alcohol intake, presence of adenomyosis and endometriosis, were not taken into consideration. Though prevalence of obesity is usually low in Indian women. Habits of smoking and alcohol are exceedingly uncommon in Indian women. Wider implications of the findings: Use of GCSF plays an important role in management of patients of thin endometrium undergoing embryo transfer. It is an easily available and economical preparation in developing countries and the intrauterine instillation of GCSF can be easily practiced in an ART unit with good results in resistant thin endometrium patients. Trial registration number Not applicable


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 1553-1557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jigal Haas ◽  
Jim Meriano ◽  
Carl Laskin ◽  
Yaakov Bentov ◽  
Eran Barzilay ◽  
...  

Lupus ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 096120332110558
Author(s):  
Rui Gao ◽  
Wei Deng ◽  
Cheng Meng ◽  
Kemin Cheng ◽  
Xun Zeng ◽  
...  

Background The influence of anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) on induced ovulation was controversial, and the effect of prednisone plus hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) treatment on frozen embryo transfer outcomes of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for ANA-positive women was unclear. Methods Fifty ANA-positive women and one-hundred ANA-negative women matched for age and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) were included from a Reproductive Medical Central of a University Hospital. Sixty-one oocytes pick-up (OPU) cycles in ANA+ group and one-hundred OPU cycles in ANA− group were compared; 30 frozen embryo transfer cycles without treatment and 66 with prednisone plus HCQ treatment among ANA-positive women were compared. Results There was no statistical difference in number of retrieved oocytes (13.66 ± 7.71 vs 13.72 ± 7.23, p = .445), available embryos (5.23 ± 3.37 vs 5.47 ± 3.26, p = .347), high-quality embryos (3.64 ± 3.25 vs 3.70 ± 3.52, p = .832), and proportion of high-quality embryos (26.5% vs. 26.7%, p = .940). Biochemical pregnancy rate (33.3% vs. 68.2%, p < .05), clinical pregnancy rate (20.0% vs. 50.1%, p < .05), and implantation rate (5.6% vs. 31.8%, p < .05) were lower, and pregnancy loss rate (83.3% vs. 23.1%, p < .05) was higher in patients with treatment than no treatment. Conclusion The influence of ANA on number of retrieved oocytes, available embryos, high-quality embryos, and proration of high-quality embryos was not found. The treatment of prednisone plus HCQ may improve implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, and clinical pregnancy rate, and reduce pregnancy loss rate in frozen embryo transfer outcomes for ANA-positive women.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Treasa Joseph ◽  
Mariano Mascarenhas ◽  
Reka Karuppusami ◽  
Muthukumar Karthikeyan ◽  
Aleyamma T Kunjummen ◽  
...  

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Does oral antioxidant pretreatment for the male partner improve clinical pregnancy rate in couples undergoing ART for male factor subfertility? SUMMARY ANSWER There was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate following oral antioxidant pretreatment for male partner in couples undergoing ART for male factor subfertility compared to no pretreatment. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Damage to sperm mediated by reactive oxygen species (ROS) contributes significantly to male factor infertility. The ROS-related injury reduces fertilization potential and adversely affects the sperm DNA integrity. Antioxidants act as free radical scavengers to protect spermatozoa against ROS induced damage. During ART, use of sperms which have been exposed to ROS-mediated damage may affect the treatment outcome. Pretreatment with antioxidants may reduce the ROS-mediated sperm DNA damage. Currently, antioxidants are commonly prescribed to men who require ART for male factor subfertility but there is ambiguity regarding their role. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This was an open label, randomized controlled trial conducted at a tertiary level infertility clinic between February 2013 and October 2019. The trial included 200 subfertile couples who were undergoing ART treatment for male factor subfertility. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Couples were randomized into treatment arm (n = 100) and control arm (n = 100). In the treatment arm, the male partner received oral antioxidants (Vitamin C, Vitamin E and Zinc) for 3 months just prior to the ART cycle. In the control arm, no antioxidant was given to the male partner. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate, while live birth rate (LBR), miscarriage rate and changes in semen parameters were the secondary outcomes. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Out of 200 women randomized, 135 underwent embryo transfer as per protocol. Following intention to treat analysis, no significant difference was noted in clinical pregnancy (36/100, 36% vs 26/100, 26%; odds ratio (OR) 1.60, 95% CI 0.87 to 2.93) and LBR (25/100, 25% vs 22/100, 22%; OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.61 to 2.27) between antioxidant and no pretreatment arms. The clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was significantly higher following antioxidant pretreatment (35/64, 54.7% vs 26/71, 36.6%; OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.05 to 4.16) compared to no pretreatment. There was no significant difference in LBR per embryo transfer (25/64, 39.1%, vs 22/71, 31.0%; OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.70 to 2.91) after antioxidant pretreatment versus no pretreatment. The semen parameters of sperm concentration (median, interquartile range, IQR) (18.2, 8.6 to 37.5 vs 20.5, 8.0 to 52.5, million/ml; P = 0.97), motility (median, IQR) (34, 20 to 45 vs 31, 18 to 45%; P = 0.38) and morphology (mean ± SD) (2.0 ± 1.4 vs 2.2 ± 1.5%; P = 0.69) did not show any significant improvement after intake of antioxidant compared to no treatment, respectively. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The objective assessment of sperm DNA damage was not carried out before and after the antioxidant pretreatment. Since the clinicians were aware of the group allotment, performance bias cannot be ruled out. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The current study did not show any significant difference in clinical pregnancy and LBR following antioxidant pretreatment for the male partner in couples undergoing ART for male subfertility. The findings need further validation in a larger placebo-controlled randomized trial. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This trial has been funded by Fluid Research grant of Christian Medical College, Vellore (internal funding). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER CTRI/2013/02/003431 TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE 26 February 2013 DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT 11 February 2013


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document