Environmental sampling, focused on environmental sites with a high probability of contamination, was conducted in eight artisan cheese processing facilities. Samples (n = 236) from 86 food contact surfaces and 150 non–food contact surfaces were examined for the presence of Listeria spp. by comparing the efficacy of three different primary enrichment media used in five detection and isolation methods. University of Vermont broth was the most sensitive primary enrichment medium for the detection of Listeria spp., including Listeria monocytogenes. These results, however, did not differ significantly from those obtained with Listeria repair broth or Oxoid 24 Listeria enrichment broth. When full methods were considered, the use of dual enrichment methods identified the most Listeria spp.–positive samples, whereas the BAX System PCR Assay for the Genus Listeria 24E provided the most rapid results (~30 h). Cultural results from the direct plating of secondary enrichment broths were generally in agreement with PCR results when compared within methods. Despite minor differences in efficacy, all five methods were in agreement with one another. Overall, 24 (10.7%) of the 236 environmental samples were positive for Listeria spp., all of which were collected from non–food contact surfaces. Nine of these sites were also positive in previous sampling events, suggesting that these sites serve as Listeria niches and that certain ribotypes are particularly persistent, inhabiting environments and specific sites for over 2 years. Overall, our results suggest that the extent of Listeria spp. contamination, notably L. monocytogenes, in small-scale artisan cheese processing environments is low.
Genetic Listeria monocytogenes Types in the Pork Processing Plant Environment: From Occasional Introduction to Plausible Persistence in Harborage Sites