Bacterial surface, biofilm and virulence properties of Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from smoked salmon and fish food contact surfaces

2021 ◽  
pp. 101021
Author(s):  
Mert Sudagidan ◽  
Veli Cengiz Ozalp ◽  
Orhan Öztürk ◽  
Mediha Nur Zafer Yurt ◽  
Orhan Yavuz ◽  
...  
Food Control ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. 240-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Ripolles-Avila ◽  
A.S. Hascoët ◽  
A.E. Guerrero-Navarro ◽  
J.J. Rodríguez-Jerez

2013 ◽  
Vol 76 (7) ◽  
pp. 1279-1282 ◽  
Author(s):  
WALID Q. ALALI ◽  
DONALD W. SCHAFFNER

The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes as an outcome and Listeria spp. as an explanatory variable by food products, food contact surfaces, and nonfood contact surfaces in seafood processing plants by using peer-reviewed published data. Nine sets of prevalence data of L. monocytogenes and Listeria spp. were collected from published studies and used for the analyses. Based on our analysis, the relationship between L. monocytogenes prevalence and Listeria spp. prevalence in food products (incoming raw materials and finish products) was significant (P = 0.04) with (low) R2 = 0.36. Furthermore, Listeria spp. were not a good indicator for L. monocytogenes when testing food contact surfaces (R2= 0.10). Listeria spp. were a good indicator for L. monocytogenes only on nonfood contact surfaces (R2= 0.90). On the other hand, the presence of Listeria spp. on food contact surfaces (R2= 0.002) and nonfood contact surfaces (R2= 0.03) was not a good indicator for L. monocytogenes presence in food products. In general, prevalence of Listeria spp. does not seem to be a good indicator for L. monocytogenes prevalence in seafood processing plants.


2012 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 1077-1082 ◽  
Author(s):  
DIEGO GÓMEZ ◽  
AGUSTÍN ARIÑO ◽  
JUAN J. CARRAMIÑANA ◽  
CARMINA ROTA ◽  
JAVIER YANGÜELA

A number of techniques exist for microbiological sampling of food processing environments in food industries. In the present study the efficacies of nine sampling procedures for the recovery of Listeria monocytogenes from food contact surfaces, including a new sampling device consisting of a miniroller, were evaluated and compared. A stainless steel table was inoculated with L. monocytogenes strain 935 (serovar 4b, human origin) and L. monocytogenes strain 437/07 (serovar 1/2b, food origin), at 105 CFU/100 cm2. L. monocytogenes strain 935 was best recovered with the minirollers (recovery of up to 6.27%), while poor recoveries (<0.30%) were obtained with the towel (one-ply composite tissue), alginate swab, metallic swab, and Petrifilm methods. In the case of L. monocytogenes strain 437/07 the replicate organism detection and counting (RODAC) ALOA contact plates yielded the best recoveries (4.15%), followed by the minirollers (up to 1.52%). Overall, recovery percentages with the minirollers were higher with stomacher homogenization than with Vibromatic agitation. The recovery percentages obtained for the Listeria strain of human origin were higher than those obtained with the food strain for all sampling procedures except Petrifilm and RODAC ALOA. With the miniroller device coated with wool fiber, the recovery of L. monocytogenes can be improved from 2 to 17 times over recoveries obtained with the sponge and cotton swab. This is the first report of a miniroller device for microbiological sampling in the available literature. The novel sampling procedure is convenient to apply on surfaces, is cost-effective, and results in better recovery of L. monocytogenes than do the conventional methods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document