Systematic-review and meta-analysis on effect of decontamination interventions on prevalence and concentration of Campylobacter spp. during primary processing of broiler chickens

2021 ◽  
pp. 103923
Author(s):  
Josphat N. Gichure ◽  
Patrick Murigu Kamau Njage ◽  
Joseph M. Wambui ◽  
Gary A. Dykes ◽  
Elna M. Buys ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-262
Author(s):  
Jan M. Sargeant ◽  
Michele D. Bergevin ◽  
Katheryn Churchill ◽  
Kaitlyn Dawkins ◽  
Bhumika Deb ◽  
...  

AbstractA systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to address the question, ‘What is the efficacy of litter management strategies to reduce morbidity, mortality, condemnation at slaughter, or total antibiotic use in broilers?’ Eligible studies were clinical trials published in English evaluating the efficacy of litter management in broilers on morbidity, condemnations at slaughter, mortality, or total antibiotic use. Multiple databases and two conference proceedings were searched for relevant literature. After relevance screening and data extraction, there were 50 trials evaluating litter type, 22 trials evaluating litter additives, 10 trials comparing fresh to re-used litter, and six trials evaluating floor type. NMAs were conducted for mortality (61 trials) and for the presence or absence of footpad lesions (15 trials). There were no differences in mortality among the litter types, floor types, or additives. For footpad lesions, peat moss appeared beneficial compared to straw, based on a small number of comparisons. In a pairwise meta-analysis, there was no association between fresh versus used litter on the risk of mortality, although there was considerable heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 66%). There was poor reporting of key design features in many studies, and analyses rarely accounted for non-independence of observations within flocks.


2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 617-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah C. Totton ◽  
Ashley M. Farrar ◽  
Wendy Wilkins ◽  
Oliver Bucher ◽  
Lisa A. Waddell ◽  
...  

Gut Pathogens ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hooriyeh Mohammadpour ◽  
Enayat Berizi ◽  
Saeid Hosseinzadeh ◽  
Majid Majlesi ◽  
Morteza Zare

2009 ◽  
Vol 137 (9) ◽  
pp. 1217-1232 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. YOUNG ◽  
A. RAJIĆ ◽  
B. J. WILHELM ◽  
L. WADDELL ◽  
S. PARKER ◽  
...  

SUMMARYThe prevalences of zoonotic and potentially zoonotic bacteria or bacteria resistant to antimicrobials in organic and conventional poultry, swine and beef production were compared using systematic review and meta-analysis methodology. Thirty-eight articles were included in the review. The prevalence of Campylobacter was higher in organic broiler chickens at slaughter, but no difference in prevalence was observed in retail chicken. Campylobacter isolates from conventional retail chicken were more likely to be ciprofloxacin-resistant (odds ratio 9·62, 95% confidence interval 5·67–16·35). Bacteria isolated from conventional animal production exhibited a higher prevalence of resistance to antimicrobials; however, the recovery of some resistant strains was also identified in organic animal production, where there is an apparent reduced antimicrobial selection pressure. Limited or inconsistent research was identified in studies examining the prevalence of zoonotic and potentially zoonotic bacteria in other food-animal species. There is a need for further research of sufficient quality in this area.


2016 ◽  
Vol 79 (10) ◽  
pp. 1775-1783 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. CHRISTIDIS ◽  
K. D. M. PINTAR ◽  
A. J. BUTLER ◽  
A. NESBITT ◽  
M. K. THOMAS ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Campylobacteriosis is the leading bacterial gastrointestinal disease internationally, contributing significantly to the enteric illness burden. Cases have been associated with the consumption of raw milk, a behavior that has garnered attention recently. Estimates of the prevalence and levels of Campylobacter spp. in raw milk are lacking, which hinders risk assessment attempts. This article is a systematic review and meta-analysis of reported prevalence and levels of zoonotic Campylobacter spp. in the raw milk of cows, goats, and sheep in Canada, the United States, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. The relevant literature was reviewed, and trained reviewers examined the results for inclusion of articles in the meta-analysis. Relevant data (prevalence and/or level of Campylobacter in raw milk, country of origin, animal species, sample source, Campylobacter species identified, etc.) were extracted, and a meta-analysis was performed in Stata v. 12 (Metaprop command). The weighted mean prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in raw milk samples was 1.18%. Subgroup analyses were conducted to examine how prevalence varied by study characteristics, with the highest prevalence values in studies from the United Kingdom (by country, 6.4%), about cows (by animal species, 1.3%), and including samples taken from inline filters (by sample source, 1.75%) and in studies that included species that are not pathogenic to humans (by Campylobacter species, 1.14%). Two articles each included a single Campylobacter level, 0.16 ± 0.3 and approximately 0.047 most probable number per ml. Despite a relatively low prevalence, consumption of raw milk is inherently risky because no treatment has been used to inactivate pathogens. This potential risk further supports maintaining regulations to limit the sales of raw milk.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document