scholarly journals Consumer willingness to pay for beef grown using climate friendly production practices

Food Policy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 93-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaogu Li ◽  
Kimberly L. Jensen ◽  
Christopher D. Clark ◽  
Dayton M. Lambert
2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 799-819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Owusu Coffie ◽  
Michael P. Burton ◽  
Fiona L. Gibson ◽  
Atakelty Hailu

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
McKENZIE MAPLES ◽  
MATTHEW G. INTERIS ◽  
KIMBERLY L. MORGAN ◽  
ARDIAN HARRI

AbstractThis study examines southeastern consumers’ willingness to pay for marginal changes in production practices that lessen the impact on the environment but that fall short of a complete conversion to organic production. We find that consumers are willing to pay more for tomatoes grown using less water, that contain less pesticide residue, that are not grown with petroleum-based fertilizers, and that travel shorter distances to the final point of sale. These estimates provide a starting point for producers who cannot convert to organic production but for whom it might be profitable to make (more feasible) marginal production changes.


HortScience ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayk Khachatryan ◽  
Ben Campbell ◽  
Charles Hall ◽  
Bridget Behe ◽  
Chengyan Yue ◽  
...  

This study adds to the consumer choice literature by linking consumers’ environmental concern (EC) orientations (egoistic, altruistic and biospheric) to willingness to pay (WTP) premiums for proenvironmental attributes. Results from a mixed-ordered probit model showed that individuals were willing to pay a premium for energy-saving production practices ($0.131), non-plastic containers such as compostable ($0.227), plantable ($0.122), and recyclable ($0.155), and locally grown plants ($0.222). Individuals scoring high on the EC scale expressed higher WTP across all attributes—$0.148 for energy-saving practices, $0.288 for locally grown plants, and $0.255, $0.143, and $0.175 for compostable, plantable, and recyclable containers, respectively. Using the results, we discuss the practical implications for nursery and garden stores (i.e., communicating product attributes related information to consumers).


1991 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 227-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond E. Massey ◽  
Joseph E. Williams

AbstractThe after-tax net present value for 27 swine breeding systems composed of Duroc, Hampshire, and Yorkshire breeds were simulated and ordered using stochastic dominance analysis. The concept of the value of information was expanded to develop the concept of the willingness to pay to adopt a new technology. For producers not currently using the dominant system, estimates of the allowable present value cost of adoption are reported and used to explain diverse production practices.


2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerrit Antonides ◽  
Sophia R. Wunderink

Summary: Different shapes of individual subjective discount functions were compared using real measures of willingness to accept future monetary outcomes in an experiment. The two-parameter hyperbolic discount function described the data better than three alternative one-parameter discount functions. However, the hyperbolic discount functions did not explain the common difference effect better than the classical discount function. Discount functions were also estimated from survey data of Dutch households who reported their willingness to postpone positive and negative amounts. Future positive amounts were discounted more than future negative amounts and smaller amounts were discounted more than larger amounts. Furthermore, younger people discounted more than older people. Finally, discount functions were used in explaining consumers' willingness to pay for an energy-saving durable good. In this case, the two-parameter discount model could not be estimated and the one-parameter models did not differ significantly in explaining the data.


Fruits ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 341-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olusegun Olufemi Olubode ◽  
Olubukola Motunrayo Odeyemi ◽  
Isaac Oreoluwa Olatokunbo Aiyelaagbe

EDIS ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey M. Meru ◽  
Yuqing Fu ◽  
Dayana Leyva ◽  
Paul Sarnoski ◽  
Yavuz Yagiz

This article aims to summise production and nutrition aspects of pumpkin seed. Specifically, it focuses on health benefits of the seeds, production practices and provides data on the oil, protein and fatty acid composition of 35 pumpkin accessions.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document