scholarly journals Sample discrimination through profiling with rate all that apply (RATA) using consumers is similar between home use test (HUT) and central location test (CLT)

2021 ◽  
pp. 104377
Author(s):  
Jun Niimi ◽  
Elizabeth S. Collier ◽  
Lisa-Maria Oberrauter ◽  
Victoria Sörensen ◽  
Cecilia Norman ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 1130-1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid A Willems ◽  
Danielle HA van Hout ◽  
Nicolien Zijlstra ◽  
Elizabeth H Zandstra

AbstractObjectiveThe present study investigated the impact of salt labelling and repeated in-home consumption on liking of reduced-salt soups.DesignParticipants received a chicken noodle soup to be consumed twice weekly at home for 5 weeks. Three soups were included: (i) regular-salt soup as available on the market; (ii) 22 %-reduced-salt soup; and (iii) 32 %-reduced-salt soup. The soups were tasted blind or with the label: ‘same great taste, less salt and more herbs’. In total, there were six experimental groups. All groups received the same soup over the whole period. Desire and liking were measured at each time of consumption.SettingIn-home and central location test.SubjectsFrench consumers (n 646).ResultsThere was no significant difference in liking between the three soups when consumed at home, whereas the reduced-salt soups were less liked than the regular-salt soup in the central location test. Labelling did not boost liking scores, which is probably explained by the fact that all soups were similarly liked when eaten at home.ConclusionsThe surprising results of the present study in France suggest that a salt reduction of up to 32 % in a chicken noodle soup did not affect long-term liking score as assessed by consumers at home. In addition, initial liking measured at the central location was not predictive of liking after repeated in-home consumption. How far we can go in reducing salt in other products without compromising product quality, and how this impacts consumers’ choice behaviour and in turn table salt use at home, are still unanswered questions.


2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 704-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Boutrolle ◽  
Delphine Arranz ◽  
Michel Rogeaux ◽  
Julien Delarue

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 490-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Boutrolle ◽  
Julien Delarue ◽  
Delphine Arranz ◽  
Michel Rogeaux ◽  
Egon Peter Köster

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1384
Author(s):  
Joachim J. Schouteten ◽  
Xavier Gellynck ◽  
Hendrik Slabbinck

Consumers are paying more and more attention to ethical and social criteria during grocery shopping. As a result, Fair Trade products which are certified to address global supply chain issues (e.g., forced labor, working conditions, fair pay), are gaining popularity. However, it is unclear to which extent Fair Trade labels might influence how consumers perceive such labelled food products. The aim of this research was to examine the potential effect of Fair Trade labels on several measurements (overall liking, sensory profiling, emotions, willingness-to-pay and kCal estimations). Furthermore, tests were carried out at a sensory lab and at home to examine if the evaluation context might impact the label effect. In total, 179 consumers participated in this study of which 90 carried out the test in the sensory test facilities (central location test—CLT) and 89 at home (home-use-test—HUT). Participants evaluated three pairs of food products (nuts, juice and chocolate) of which one was labelled as conventional and the other one as Fair Trade. However, participants were each time evaluating the same Fair Trade product. Results showed that the Fair Trade label increased the overall liking. For the juice and chocolate, a higher willingness-to-pay was found when the product was labelled as ‘Fair Trade’ while no effect of the label was established for the nuts. The Fair Trade label did not affect the kcal estimation of the samples. The Fair Trade label had a rather limited influence on the sensory and emotional profiling of the food products. Furthermore, the results of the CLT and HUT were highly similar indicating that the evaluation context has little impact on the labelling effect.


EDIS ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick M. Fishel ◽  
Tatiana Sanchez

The Worker Protection Standard (WPS) is a Federal regulation designed to protect agricultural workers (people involved in the production of agricultural plants) and pesticide handlers (people mixing, loading, or applying pesticides or doing other tasks involving direct contact with pesticides). It has been in full implementation since 1995. This document provides general guidance to help you comply with the requirements of the Federal Worker Protection Standard (WPS) for agricultural pesticides, 40 CFR part 170, as amended in 2015. This document addresses specific information that agricultural establishments must display at a central location for their employees.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document