Insects colonising carcasses in open and forest habitats of Central Europe: Search for indicators of corpse relocation

2013 ◽  
Vol 231 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 234-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Szymon Matuszewski ◽  
Michał Szafałowicz ◽  
Mateusz Jarmusz
2008 ◽  
Vol 180 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 61-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Szymon Matuszewski ◽  
Daria Bajerlein ◽  
Szymon Konwerski ◽  
Krzysztof Szpila

1994 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 550-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Bobek ◽  
K. Perzanowski ◽  
D. Merta ◽  
S. Kossak

Central European countries share many similarities in the composition of forest habitats and wildlife species. However, the former political division of Europe produced substantial differences in wildlife management systems and land ownership. Forests are generally regarded as a source of lumber with the requirements of wildlife neglected most of the time. There is an urgent need to introduce measures enhancing forest habitats for wildlife. Most important seems to be maintaining and possibly increasing biodiversity by altering present logging systems. In future, production of timber should become only one of several functions of forests including conservation of wildlife, recreation, and other values.


2015 ◽  
Vol 166 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Tschopp ◽  
Rolf Holderegger ◽  
Kurt Bollmann

Effects of Douglas fir on forest biodiversity Under climate change, forestry in Switzerland promotes the increased cultivation of exotic Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), as Douglas fir is more drought-resistant than native spruce. However, nature conservation organisations fear that enhanced planting of Douglas fir will negatively affect biodiversity and that Douglas fir has invasive potential. Based on the existing scientific and grey literature, we compile the present knowledge on the effects on forest habitats and biodiversity and the invasiveness of Douglas fir in Central Europe. The cultivation of Douglas fir does not seem to have any additional negative effects on soils as compared to native conifers, and its effects on biodiversity are diverse and often inconsistent. Overall, there is often a shift in species composition and in the dominance ratio for most studied groups of organisms (e.g. fungi, plants, arthropods, birds) in Douglas fir stands. Although natural regeneration of Douglas fir does occur in many regions of Central Europe, its extent, site-specificity and frequency and, therefore, the invasiveness of Douglas fir are not yet clear. We identified the following knowledge gaps: 1) Douglas fir should be studied along mixture gradients with other tree species, especially beech, in order to determine threshold values at which negative effects of biodiversity begin to appear. 2) The effects of Douglas fir on Red List, priority or characteristic forest species have not yet been thoroughly evaluated. 3) Frequency of natural regeneration and dispersal potential of Douglas fir in Central Europe should be assessed. Filling these knowledge gaps will allow a more reliable and integral assessment of the biodiversity effects of Douglas fir and its invasive potential.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document