Hydroprocessing of Maya vacuum residue using a NiMo catalyst supported on Cr-doped alumina

Fuel ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 263 ◽  
pp. 116717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holda Puron ◽  
Jose Luis Pinilla ◽  
Andrey A. Saraev ◽  
Vasily V. Kaichev ◽  
Marcos Millan
Keyword(s):  
Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (18) ◽  
pp. 4967
Author(s):  
Kirtika Kohli ◽  
Ravindra Prajapati ◽  
Samir K. Maity ◽  
Brajendra Kumar Sharma

The effect of different supports such as silica (SBA-15), activated carbon (AC), and mesoporous alumina (Al2O3) on catalytic activities of hydrotreating nickel molybdenum (NiMo) catalysts was demonstrated for upgrading vacuum residue. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption analysis showed that SBA-15 and the AC-supported NiMo catalyst possessed a very high surface area compared to the alumina-supported catalyst. However, NiMo/Al2O3 catalyst possesses a higher pore diameter and pore volume with an appropriate surface area. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis showed that active metals were dispersed in the catalytic supports. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis revealed the presence of type II active MoS2 sites in the NiMo/Al2O3 catalyst, which showed weak metal-support interactions having a high intrinsic activity. Catalyst activities such as hydrodesulfurization (HDS), hydrodemetallization (HDM) and asphaltene conversion (HDAs), and hydrocracking conversions of a vacuum residue were evaluated. The highest hydrotreating and hydrocracking conversions were observed with the NiMo catalyst supported on mesoporous alumina. The results also supported that the catalyst that has a large pore diameter, high pore volume, and better active metals dispersion is highly desirable for the upgrading of a vacuum residue.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isalmi Aziz ◽  
Tri Retnaningsih ◽  
Dhika Gustama ◽  
Nanda Saridewi ◽  
Lisa Adhani ◽  
...  

ACS Omega ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (51) ◽  
pp. 33290-33304
Author(s):  
Dicho Stratiev ◽  
Svetoslav Nenov ◽  
Ivelina Shishkova ◽  
Borislav Georgiev ◽  
Georgi Argirov ◽  
...  

Fuel ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 299 ◽  
pp. 120903
Author(s):  
Yuanjun Che ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Jinhua Huo ◽  
Yuanyu Tian

Fuel ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 74 (11) ◽  
pp. 1704-1708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Bengoa ◽  
Josep Font ◽  
Angel Moros ◽  
Azael Fabregat ◽  
Francesc Giralt

Processes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 500
Author(s):  
Vladimir Kapustin ◽  
Elena Chernysheva ◽  
Roman Khakimov

In recent years, there has been a trend in the global oil industry to improve the proportion of heavy high-sulfur crude oils in the total volume of extracted and processed resources, reserves of which are estimated at over 800 billion metric tons. Therefore, the main line of oil refining is processing of heavy crudes and residua to allow maximum use of the hydrocarbon potential and yield of high-margin products. Hydrogenation processes of heavy raw materials are most attractive in terms of product quality. This article analyzes tar hydrocracking processes that are either in operation or at the stage of full-scale testing. These include Veba Combi-Cracker (VCC), Uniflex, suspended-bed catalyst hydrocracking (ENI), and vacuum residue hydroconversion (TIPS RAS). These technologies use heterogeneous catalysts and are designed to obtain the largest possible amount of liquid products. This article discusses the features of each technology, highlights their advantages and disadvantages, shows the main approaches to process management, and speculates about the development of these technologies. Tar refining is a major process in heavy oil upgrading, and the development of efficient tar-processing methods will influence refinery configurations and management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document