Memory effect of CO2-hydrate formation in porous media

Fuel ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 299 ◽  
pp. 120922
Author(s):  
Zhiang Wen ◽  
Yanbin Yao ◽  
Wanjing Luo ◽  
Xin Lei
2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 8548-8559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Zhang ◽  
Sudan Xu ◽  
Xin Li ◽  
Yin Zhang ◽  
Ruohan Yang ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 1205-1214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaurav Bhattacharjee ◽  
Asheesh Kumar ◽  
Tushar Sakpal ◽  
Rajnish Kumar

2015 ◽  
Vol 55 (29) ◽  
pp. 7981-7991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheng Rong Chong ◽  
Mingjun Yang ◽  
Boo Cheong Khoo ◽  
Praveen Linga

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy J. Adams ◽  
I. Yucel Akkutlu ◽  
George J. Moridis

2019 ◽  
Vol 158 ◽  
pp. 5323-5328
Author(s):  
Tao Lv ◽  
Xiaosen Li ◽  
Zhaoyang Chen ◽  
Kefeng Yan ◽  
Yu Zhang

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marshall A Pickarts ◽  
Jose Delgado-Linares ◽  
Erika Brown ◽  
Vinod Veedu ◽  
Carolyn A. Koh

Abstract Numerous solids including gas hydrates, waxes, and asphaltenes have the potential to form in the production lines of gas and oil fields. This creates a highly non-ideal scenario as the accumulation of said species leads to flow assurance issues, especially with long-term processes like deposition. Since an ever-increasing amount of material is deposited in place at the pipe surface, production stoppage or active mitigation efforts become inevitable. The latter production issues result in increased safety risks and operational expenditures. Therefore, a cost-effective, passive deposition mitigation technology, such as a pipeline coating or surface treatment is especially appealing. The ability to address multiple pipeline flow assurance issues simultaneously without actively disrupting production would represent a dramatic step forward in this area. This study is part of a long-term ongoing effort that evaluates the performance and application of an omniphobic surface treatment for solids deposition prevention in industrially relevant systems. In particular, this specific work concentrates on the efficacy and robustness of the treatment under fully flowing conditions. The apparatuses utilized for this include two flowloops: a lab-scale, high-pressure flowloop for gas hydrate and surface treatment durability studies, and a bench-scale, atmospheric pressure loop for crude oil and asphaltene experiments. Film growth in high-pressure flowloop tests corroborated previous reports of delayed gas hydrate nucleation observed in rocking cells. Without the aid of the memory effect, treated oil-dominated experiments never experienced hydrate formation, spending upwards of a week in the hydrate stability zone (at the subcooled/fluid test conditions). Subsequent tests which utilized the memory effect then revealed that the hydrate formation rate reduced in the presence of the surface treatment compared to a bare stainless-steel surface. This testing was part of a larger set of trials conducted in the flowloop, which lasted about one year. The surface treatment durability under flowing conditions was evaluated during this time. Even after experiencing ∼4000 operating hours and 2 full pressure cycles, no evidence of delamination or damage was detected. Finally, as part of an extension to previous work, corroded surface asphaltene deposition experiments were performed in a bench-top flowloop. Treated experiments displayed an order of magnitude reduction in both total oil (all fractions of crude oil) and asphaltene fraction deposited.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 720-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard A. Baldwin ◽  
Jim Stevens ◽  
James J. Howard ◽  
Arne Graue ◽  
Bjorn Kvamme ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 93 (8) ◽  
pp. 808-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhishek Nambiar ◽  
Ponnivalavan Babu ◽  
Praveen Linga

A new biodegradable porous medium has been employed in this work for the hydrate-based gas separation (HBGS) process to capture carbon dioxide in a fixed bed column from a precombustion stream. Propane (2.5 mol%) was added as a promoter to reduce the operating pressure of the HBGS process. Experiments were conducted at 6 MPa and 274.2 K at different water saturation levels (50% and 100%) in a cellulose foam bed. It was found that a normalized rate of hydrate formation was more than double for 50% as compared to 100% water-saturated level. In addition, kinetic modelling of hydrate formation in porous media has been carried out using Avrami model by utilizing the experimental gas uptake data from current and published works. The Avrami model was found to fit the hydrate growth kinetics very well, up to 40 min of hydrate growth for different porous media like silica sand, polyurethane foam, and cellulose foam, and for different guest gas and gas mixtures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document