Stakeholder analysis in health innovation planning processes: A systematic scoping review

Health Policy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 124 (10) ◽  
pp. 1083-1099
Author(s):  
L. Franco-Trigo ◽  
F. Fernandez-Llimos ◽  
F. Martínez-Martínez ◽  
S.I. Benrimoj ◽  
D. Sabater-Hernández
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Stakeholder Analysis ◽  
Health Innovation ◽  
Planning Processes ◽  
Innovation Planning

scholarly journals Optimizing the InterRAI Assessment Tool in Care Planning Processes for Long-Term Residents: A Scoping Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 105477382110203
Author(s):  
Steve Iduye ◽  
Tracie Risling ◽  
Shelley McKibbon ◽  
Damilola Iduye
Keyword(s):  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Planning Processes ◽  
Assessment Scales ◽  
Interrai Assessment

The aim of this review was to chart and report on existing literature that discusses how the interRAI assessment tool drives care-planning processes for residents in long-term-care settings. This scoping review was informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for scoping reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guideline. Relevant studies were obtained from databases search of CINAHL (EBSCO), MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (EBSCO), Academic Search Premier (EBSCO), Embase (Elsevier), ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Database (ProQuest), Sociological Abstracts (ProQuest), and Social Services Abstracts (ProQuest). Of the 17 included studies, five (29.4%) addressed interRAI’s minimum dataset component as a clinical data-collection tool; five (29.4%) addressed interRAI’s assessment scales and its clinical-assessment protocols as viable health-assessment tools; four (23.5%) considered interRAI’s assessment scales in terms of whether this tool is capable of predicting residents’ health risks; one (5.9%) addressed the effects of interRAI’s care plans on residents’ health outcomes; and the remaining two studies (11.8%) used interRAI’s quality-indicator function for both the performance of and improvements in the quality of care. The scoping review finds that there is no substantial evidence that supports the implementation of interRAI care plans for consistent health outcomes.

scholarly journals Innovation planning

2019 ◽  
pp. 49-54
Author(s):  
Emine Nazif
Keyword(s):  
Future Development ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
Innovation Strategy ◽  
Competitive Advantages ◽  
Business Objectives ◽  
Theoretical Assumptions ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Planning Processes ◽  
Innovation Planning

The report examines theoretical assumptions regarding the nature and importance of innovation. Regardless of the diversity we see in terms of defining different types of innovation, we can come to the conclusion that all definitions have one common feature and it relates to focusing on the presence of something new and different. Innovation planning processes are discussed by indicating that they are aimed at defining specific actions so that the objectives set out in the company's innovation strategy can be achieved. The most important functions of planning are to coordinate the efforts of the participants in the innovation process and to link business objectives and opportunities for future development. Emphasis is placed on the importance of innovation for each organization and the necessary investment of efforts for appropriate innovation planning that provides competitive advantages.

Engaged scholarship for health innovation

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tinashe E.M. Mutsvangwa ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Engaged Scholarship ◽  
Health Innovation

Defining and assessing walkability: a concept for an integrated approach using surveys, biosensors and geospatial analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Dörrzapf ◽  
Anna Kovács-Győri ◽  
Bernd Resch ◽  
Peter Zeile
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Planning ◽  
Recent Literature ◽  
Integrated Approach ◽  
Measurement Methods ◽  
Transport Mode ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Spatial Environment ◽  
Planning Processes ◽  
Valuable Complement ◽  
Definition Of

AbstractWalking as a transport mode is still often underrepresented in the overall transport system. Consequently, pedestrian mobility is usually not recorded statistically in the same manner as it is performed for motorised traffic which leads to an underestimation of its importance and positive effects on people and cities. However, the integration of walkability assessments is potentially a valuable complement in urban planning processes through considering important quantitative and qualitative aspects of walking in cities. Recent literature shows a variety of approaches involving discrepancies in the definition of walkability, the factors which contribute to it, and methods of assessing them. This paper provides a new understanding of the concept of walkability in the European context. Our approach relies on the extension of methodological competence in transportation, spatial planning and geography by linking new measurement methods for evaluating walkability. We propose an integrated approach to assessing walkability in a comprehensive methodology that combines existing qualitative and GIS-based methods with biosensor technologies and thus captures the perceptions and emotions of pedestrians. This results in an increased plausibility and relevance of the results of walkability analysis by considering the spatial environment and its effect on people.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document