Development of Device Therapy for Ventricular Arrhythmias

2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loraine K. Holley
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuoyo O Mene-Afejuku ◽  
Abayomi O Bamgboje ◽  
Modele O Ogunniyi ◽  
Ola Akinboboye ◽  
Uzoma N Ibebuogu

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a global public health problem which affects over 23 million people worldwide. The prevalence of HF is higher among seniors in the USA and other developed countries. Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) account for 50% of deaths among patients with HF. We aim to elucidate on the factors associated with VAs among seniors with HF, as well as therapies that may improve outcomes. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library databases, Science Direct, and Google Scholar were searched using specific key words. The reference lists of relevant articles were searched for additional studies related to HF and VAs among seniors as well as associated outcomes. Results: The prevalence of VAs increases with worsening HF. 24-hour Holter electrocardiogram may be useful in risk stratifying patients for device therapy if they do not meet the criterion of low ventricular ejection fraction. Implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) are superior to anti-arrhythmic drugs in reducing mortality in patients with HF. Guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) together with device therapy to reduce symptoms may be required. In general, the proportion of seniors on GDMT is low. A combination of ICDs and cardiac resynchronization therapy may improve outcomes in select patients. Conclusion: Seniors with HF and VAs have a high mortality even with the use device therapy and GDMT. The holistic effect of device therapy on outcomes among seniors with HF is equivocal. More studies focused on seniors with advanced HF as well as therapeutic options is therefore required.


2005 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 1428-1434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ohad Ziv ◽  
Jose Dizon ◽  
Amit Thosani ◽  
Yoshifumi Naka ◽  
Anthony R. Magnano ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-143
Author(s):  
Ikutaro Nakajima ◽  
Takashi Noda ◽  
Kohei Ishibashi ◽  
Yuko Yamada ◽  
Koji Miyamoto ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 26-28
Author(s):  
M. Vinall ◽  
D. S. Cannom ◽  
C. D. Swerdlow ◽  
R. J. Lampert ◽  
K. A. Ellenbogen

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Liam Driver

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy is a rare but potentially lethal condition that predominantly affects the right ventricle although a left or biventricular form is now recognised. The condition can present in a variety of ways from palpitations to aborted sudden cardiac death. It is characterised by the replacement of healthy myocardium with fatty infiltrates and is progressive in nature. There is no single test for this condition and diagnosis can be difficult – relying on a diagnostic criteria to aid diagnosis. This score system uses criteria based on ECG findings, evidence of arrhythmia, structural changes detected on echocardiogram and MRI, histopathology and family history. Treatment is initially medicine based, to suppress ventricular arrhythmias; however, patients may require device therapy, ablation or cardiac transplantation. There are recognised psychological implications for patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular tachycardia and they may require support to come to terms with the changes that a diagnosis can bring.


Author(s):  
Evan Harmon ◽  
Brittney Heard ◽  
Sarah Ratcliffe ◽  
Mark Smolkin ◽  
J Michael Mangrum ◽  
...  

Background: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a major driver of mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD). The degree to which ventricular arrhythmias (VA) play a role in SCD in ESRD patients is unclear. Objective: Use cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) to clarify VA burden in ESRD patients overall and in relation to interdialytic cycle. Methods: We identified 44 patients at a single academic center with CIEDs, 22 on HD, along with 22 age- and sex-matched controls. Device interrogations from 11/13/14 – 4/8/19 were reviewed. Results: Overall, there were no differences in HD patients and controls in adjusted overall event rate (HD 9.81 x 10-5 ± 1.5 x 10-3 events/patient-hours vs control 3.71 x 10-5 ± 9.1 x 10-4 events/patient-hours, p = 0.902), or proportion of patients experiencing VA event (HD 45.4% vs control 63.6%, p = 0.226). There was no difference in ventricular pacing burden. Controls were more likely to require device therapy for VT/VF episodes (total ATP episodes 2/38 in HD vs 10/22 in controls, p < 0.01, total ICD shocks 10/38 in HD vs 17/22 in controls, p < 0.01). HD patients were most likely to experience VA within 12-hours of HD completion (p < 0.01), and the vast majority of events were NSVT. Conclusion: VA and ventricular pacing burden was similar by CIED analysis between groups. In HD patients, VA were likely to occur within the first 12 hours post-dialysis, were primarily NSVT, and were unlikely to require device therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document