Saturn’s planetary period oscillations: Interhemispheric coupling and enforcement of the ‘plasma cam’ by vertically propagating atmospheric waves

Icarus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 365 ◽  
pp. 114501
Author(s):  
C.G.A. Smith
Tellus ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 499-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. P. Kurbatkin
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 711-737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew F. Garvert ◽  
Bradley Smull ◽  
Cliff Mass

Abstract This study combines high-resolution mesoscale model simulations and comprehensive airborne Doppler radar observations to identify kinematic structures influencing the production and mesoscale distribution of precipitation and microphysical processes during a period of heavy prefrontal orographic rainfall over the Cascade Mountains of Oregon on 13–14 December 2001 during the second phase of the Improvement of Microphysical Parameterization through Observational Verification Experiment (IMPROVE-2) field program. Airborne-based radar detection of precipitation from well upstream of the Cascades to the lee allows a depiction of terrain-induced wave motions in unprecedented detail. Two distinct scales of mesoscale wave–like air motions are identified: 1) a vertically propagating mountain wave anchored to the Cascade crest associated with strong midlevel zonal (i.e., cross barrier) flow, and 2) smaller-scale (<20-km horizontal wavelength) undulations over the windward foothills triggered by interaction of the low-level along-barrier flow with multiple ridge–valley corrugations oriented perpendicular to the Cascade crest. These undulations modulate cloud liquid water (CLW) and snow mixing ratios in the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University–National Center for Atmospheric Research (PSU–NCAR) Mesoscale Model (MM5), with modeled structures comparing favorably to radar-documented zones of enhanced reflectivity and CLW measured by the NOAA P3 aircraft. Errors in the model representation of a low-level shear layer and the vertically propagating mountain waves are analyzed through a variety of sensitivity tests, which indicated that the mountain wave’s amplitude and placement are extremely sensitive to the planetary boundary layer (PBL) parameterization being employed. The effects of 1) using unsmoothed versus smoothed terrain and 2) the removal of upstream coastal terrain on the flow and precipitation over the Cascades are evaluated through a series of sensitivity experiments. Inclusion of unsmoothed terrain resulted in net surface precipitation increases of ∼4%–14% over the windward slopes relative to the smoothed-terrain simulation. Small-scale waves (<20-km horizontal wavelength) over the windward slopes significantly impact the horizontal pattern of precipitation and hence quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) accuracy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (04) ◽  
pp. 1850011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Katebi ◽  
Behrouz Gatmiri ◽  
Pooneh Maghoul

This paper investigates topographic effects of rocky valleys with irregular topographic conditions subjected to vertically propagating SV waves of Ricker type using a boundary element code. Valleys with two intersecting slopes, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], are modelled in order to study their combined effects on ground motion. Presented in the form of pseudo-acceleration response spectra, results of this work can be extended to similar topographies. The main findings are: (i) [Formula: see text] (the first slope angle) and [Formula: see text] (L is the half width of the valley and [Formula: see text] is its corresponding height) have amplifying effects, and [Formula: see text] (the second slope angle) has de-amplifying effects on the site response. (ii) [Formula: see text] has a straight effect on intensifying the effects of both [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. (iii) The combined effects of slope angles have been found to be important in modifying the response so more than a single slope should be considered for seismic analysis. (iv) Engineers should use the maximum amplification of 2.4 in case of valleys with the first and second slope angles below [Formula: see text].


2004 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 363-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.B Jones ◽  
D.M. Wright ◽  
J. Milner ◽  
T.K. Yeoman ◽  
T. Reid ◽  
...  

In previous communications we have outlined two experimental methods of examining the effects of the atmospheric ionized layer in short-distance wireless transmission. In the first type of experiment the existence of night-time interference phenomena between two sets of waves was demonstrated by changing the wave-length of the transmitter continuously through a small range and observing the resultant maxima and minima of signal intensity. It was suggested that such interference took place between ground waves and waves deviated through large angles by the upper atmosphere. In the second type of experiment the angle of incidence of such atmospheric waves at the earth’s surface was measured by comparing the magnitude of the electric and magnetic forces in the stationary wave system produced at the ground. The results of these experiments were interpreted as yielding a direct experimental proof of the existence of the Kennelly-Heaviside layer, and also as demonstrating that the “fading” of broadcasting signals at moderate distances from the transmitter was due mainly to interference phenomena between two sets of waves arriving at a receiver with an appreciable path difference. But there still remained the problem of the cause of the natural succession of interference effects which constitutes fading at moderate distances, and which takes place continuously throughout the night-time. These variations indicate either that the phase relation between the ground and atmospheric waves is continually changing at night, or that intensity or polarization changes of the atmospheric waves are taking place. In considering possible causes of phase variations, let us examine the relation between the path difference and the wave-length for a typical case of short-distance transmission. Let D represent the path-difference between the ground and atmospheric rays. Then the atmospheric ray arrives n wavelengths behind the ground ray at the receiver, where n = D/ λ , and λ is the wave-length. It has been mentioned above that a possible cause of the natural signal variations which occur at night is a continuous change of phase which would be produced by a change in n . Such a change might be brought about by changes in D, or in λ , or in both simultaneously, and it is necessary to decide between these possibilities. Changes in D might be brought about by a variation in the height of the layer, so that a Döppler effect at "reflection” is produced. In such a case the signal variation might be regarded as the beating between the ground-ray frequency and the reflected-ray frequency. On the other hand, if there is a slow variation of transmitter frequency, the frequency of the atmospheric ray would be different from that of the ground ray, because of the difference in times of emission from the transmitter, and, again, the natural changes might be regarded as beats. The suggestion has already been made by Breit that fading is due to the modulation of the carrier wave, and thus to change of wave-length. In the latter connection we have to consider the variation of both carrier wave and side-band frequencies. The results of our earlier experiments suggested that the change of side-band frequency necessary for the wireless transmission of music is sufficient to produce selective frequency fading, and thus a certain amount of distortion. But with the normal type of modulation the signal intensity is chiefly dependent on the intensity of the carrier wave, and the question whether a slow “swing” of the carrier wave is responsible for such fading (which is observed whether the carrier wave is modulated or unmodulated) seems still unanswered. The question, of course, is equally of interest in both continuous wave telegraphy and wireless telephony.


2020 ◽  
pp. 197-217
Author(s):  
Vlado Spiridonov ◽  
Mladjen Curic
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Petra Koucká Knížová ◽  
Jan Laštovička ◽  
Daniel Kouba ◽  
Zbyšek Mošna ◽  
Katerina Podolská ◽  
...  

The ionosphere represents part of the upper atmosphere. Its variability is observed on a wide-scale temporal range from minutes, or even shorter, up to scales of the solar cycle and secular variations of solar energy input. Ionosphere behavior is predominantly determined by solar and geomagnetic forcing. However, the lower-lying atmospheric regions can contribute significantly to the resulting energy budget. The energy transfer between distant atmospheric parts happens due to atmospheric waves that propagate from their source region up to ionospheric heights. Experimental observations show the importance of the involvement of the lower atmosphere in ionospheric variability studies in order to accurately capture small-scale features of the upper atmosphere. In the Part I Coupling, we provide a brief overview of the influence of the lower atmosphere on the ionosphere and summarize the current knowledge. In the Part II Coupling Evidences Within Ionospheric Plasma—Experiments in Midlatitudes, we demonstrate experimental evidence from mid-latitudes, particularly those based on observations by instruments operated by the Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences. The focus will mainly be on coupling by atmospheric waves.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document