Effect of crack opening velocity and adhesive layer thickness on the fracture behaviour of hyperelastic adhesive joints subjected to mode I loading

2018 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 9-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Schmandt ◽  
Stephan Marzi
2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 399-406
Author(s):  
Makoto Imanaka ◽  
Keisuke Ikeda ◽  
Yoshinobu Nakamura ◽  
Masaki Kimoto

2012 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
pp. 433-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takayuki Kusaka ◽  
Keiko Watanabe ◽  
Masaki Hojo ◽  
Toshiyasu Fukuoka ◽  
Masayasu Ishibashi

2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 978-984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Joon Oh ◽  
I. C. Howard ◽  
J. R. Yates

Cryogenics ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 751-753
Author(s):  
K. Humer ◽  
E.K. Tschegg ◽  
R. Platschka ◽  
H.W. Weber

Author(s):  
C C H Guyott ◽  
P Cawley ◽  
R D Adams

The operation of the Fokker bond tester has been investigated. The instrument monitors one of the natural frequencies of the system comprising a piezoelectric crystal coupled to the joint under test. The resonant frequencies of two different sizes of transducer coupled to both plain plates and adhesive joints have been investigated both theoretically and experimentally, the measured values being in line with the predictions. It has been concluded that the method is satisfactory for the location of disbonds in a multi-layer construction but that it cannot distinguish between adhesive modulus and adhesive layer thickness. Both of these parameters affect the adhesive stiffness and hence the measured resonant frequencies. However, they have different effects on the cohesive strength of the adhesive so unless independent measurements of, for example, thickness are made, erroneous strength predictions may be obtained. Also, the measured frequencies are independent of adhesive stiffness over a wide range of typical stiffnesses, so changes in adhesive properties will not be measured in these cases.


Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1499
Author(s):  
Marek Rośkowicz ◽  
Jan Godzimirski ◽  
Andrzej Komorek ◽  
Michał Jasztal

One of the most relevant geometrical factors defining an adhesive joint is the thickness of the adhesive layer. The influence of the adhesive layer thickness on the joint strength has not been precisely understood so far. This article presents simplified analytical formulas for adhesive joint strength and adhesive joint coefficient for different joint loading, assuming, inter alia: linear-elastic strain of adhesive layer, elastic strain of adherends and only one kind of stress in adhesive. On the basis of the presented adhesive joint coefficient, the butt joint was selected for the tests of the influence of adhesive thickness on the adhesive failure stress. The tests showed clearly that with an increase in the thickness of the tested adhesive layers (up to about 0.17 mm), the value of their failure stress decreased quasi linearly. Furthermore, some adhesive joints (inter alia subjected to shearing) may display the optimum value of the thickness of the adhesive layer in terms of the strength of the joint. Thus, the aim of this work was to explain the phenomenon of optimal adhesive layer thickness in some types of adhesive joints. The verifying test was conducted with use of single simple lap joints. Finally, with the use of the FE method, the authors were able to obtain stresses in the adhesive layers of lap joints for loads that destroyed that joints in the experiment, and the FEM-calculated failure stresses for lap joints were compared with the adhesive failure stresses determined experimentally using the butt specimens. Numerical calculations were conducted with the use of the continuum mechanics approach (stress-based), and the non-linear behavior of the adhesive and plastic strain of the adherends was taken into account.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document