Echo-doppler and invasive evaluation of valvulo-arterial impedance in patients with severe aortic stenosis: impact of pressure recovery

2015 ◽  
Vol 179 ◽  
pp. 49-51
Author(s):  
Corinna Bergamini ◽  
Giorgio Golia ◽  
Aldo D. Milano ◽  
Matteo Pernigo ◽  
Francesca Vassanelli ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (U) ◽  
pp. U61-U68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Crochan J. O’Sullivan ◽  
Fabien Praz ◽  
Stefan Stortecky ◽  
Stephan Windecker ◽  
Peter Wenaweser

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edda Bahlmann ◽  
Dana Cramariuc ◽  
Eva Gerdts ◽  
Christa Gohlke-Baerwolf ◽  
Chritoph Nienaber ◽  
...  

Background: Downstream pressure recovery (PR) in the aorta affects transvalvular pressure gradient measurement and calculation of aortic valve area by continuity equation in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Methods: To assess the clinical importance of PR on evaluation of severity of AS, echocardiographic data in 1562 patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis (mean age 67 ± 10, 39% women, 51% hypertensive) recruited in the Simvastatin Ezitimibe in Aortic Stenosis (SEAS) study was used. The inner diameter of the ascending aorta was measured at annulus and at sinutubular junction. The aortic valve area (AVAI) was calculated from annular diameter and velocity time integrals from sub- and transaortic flow by Doppler. PR and PR corrected AVAI assessed as energy loss index (ELI) were calculated by previously published equations. Severe aortic stenosis was defined as AVAI <0.60cm 2 /m 2 and ELI <0.55cm 2 /m 2 , respectively. Patients were grouped into tertiles of peak transaortic Doppler velocity (<2.79, 2.79 –3.32, ≥3.33 m/sec, respectively). Results: In the total study population, PR ranged from 1.22–16.75 mmHg (mean 5.9±2.3), AVAI from 0.20 –1.85 cm 2 /m 2 (mean 0.67±0.22) and ELI from 0.22–5.94 cm 2 /m 2 (mean 0.89±0.45). PR increased significantly with severity of AS (Table 1 ). Both AVAI and ELI decreased with increasing peak transaortic velocity, and the overestimation of AS severity by using unadjusted AVA was largest in the lowest tertile (Table 1 ). Conclusion: Severity of AS is often overestimated in milder degrees of asymptomatic AS if correction for pressure recovery is not performed. Adjustment of AVA for the effect of energy loss should be performed routinely, and this may be especially important for accuracy of severity assessment in patients with relatively low transvalvular velocities. Table 1


2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 1006-1016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara E. Stähli ◽  
Amr Abouelnour ◽  
Thi Dan Linh Nguyen ◽  
Alessandra Vecchiati ◽  
Willibald Maier ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 030006052095470
Author(s):  
Florian Sagmeister ◽  
Sebastian Herrmann ◽  
Tobias Gassenmaier ◽  
Peter Bernhardt ◽  
Volker Rasche ◽  
...  

Objective To assess the influence of pressure recovery (PR)-corrected haemodynamic parameters on outcome in patients with aortic stenosis. Methods Aortic stenosis severity parameters were corrected for PR (increase in static pressure due to decreasing dynamic pressure), assessed using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), in patients with aortic stenosis. PR, indexed PR (iPR) and energy loss index (ELI) were determined. Factors that predicted all-cause mortality, and 9-month or 10-year New York Heart Association classification ≥2 were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results A total of 25 patients, aged 68 ± 10 years, were included. PR was 17 ± 6 mmHg using CMR, and CMR correlated with TTE measurements. PR correction using CMR data reduced the AS-severity classification in 12–20% of patients, and correction using TTE data reduced the AS-severity classification in 16% of patients. Age (Wald 4.774) was a statistically significant predictor of all-cause mortality; effective orifice area (Wald 3.753) and ELI (Wald 3.772) almost reached significance. Conclusions PR determination may result in significant reclassification of aortic stenosis severity and may hold value in predicting all-cause mortality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document