scholarly journals PCSK9: The functional relevance of fenofibrate–statin combination therapy to reduce residual cardiovascular risk

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Charles Fruchart
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (03) ◽  
pp. 867-877
Author(s):  
Kaushik Biswas ◽  
Ajoy Tiwari ◽  
Prachi Jadhav ◽  
Amit Goel ◽  
G V Chanukya

Introduction: Patients with mixed dyslipidemia are presented with high levels of low-density lipid cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides (TG), and reduced high-density lipid cholesterol (HDL-C). Though useful in lowering LDL-C, therapy with rosuvastatin is insufficient in optimizing the overall lipid profile, thus putting the patient at risk of residual cardiovascular risk. A combination of statin with other lipid-modifying agents has been used with more efficient lipid control and cardiovascular risk prevention. Of these, fenofibric acid is the most frequently used, along with rosuvastatin. Methods: Authors conducted a literature search of published literature to assess the use of rosuvastatin and fenofibrate combination in the management of mixed hyperlipidaemia. Results and discussion: The authors selected a total of 46 articles to be included in the review. Due to the small number of articles and heterogeneity on the combination of rosuvastatin and fenofibrate combination in mixed hyperlipidemia, the findings herein are presented using narrative summaries. Based on the thorough assessment of the selected literature, the essential themes that emerged from the review include safety and efficacy of rosuvastatin and fenofibrate combination, place of therapy of rosuvastatin, and fenofibrate combination, and potential cardiovascular risk reduction with rosuvastatin and fenofibrate combination.   Conclusion: Based on the review, the authors suggested that the combination therapy with fenofibric acid was beneficial, well-tolerated with a similar safety profile compared with statin monotherapy. The combination therapy of moderate dose rosuvastatin and fenofibric acid led to a reduction of cardiovascular risk factors via several pathways.


2021 ◽  
Vol 331 ◽  
pp. e150
Author(s):  
F. Barkas ◽  
G. Anastasiou ◽  
G. Liamis ◽  
I. Gartzonikas ◽  
H. Milionis ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Simon-Dominik Herkenrath

<b>Background:</b> Background: Although combination therapy is the gold standard for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), some of these patients are still being treated with monotherapy. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective analysis at four German PH centres to describe the prevalence and characteristics of patients receiving monotherapy. <b>Results:</b> We identified 131 incident PAH patients, with a mean age of 64 ± 13.8 years and a varying prevalence of comorbidities, cardiovascular risk factors and targeted therapy. As in other studies, the extent of prescribed PAH therapy varied with age and coexisting diseases, and younger, so-called «typical» PAH patients were more commonly treated early with combination therapy (48% at 4–8 months). In contrast, patients with multiple comorbidities or cardiovascular risk factors were more often treated with monotherapy (69% at 4–8 months). Survival at 12 months was not significantly associated with the number of PAH drugs used (single, dual, triple therapy) and was not different between «atypical» and «typical» PAH patients (89% vs. 85%). <b>Conclusion:</b> Although «atypical» PAH patients with comorbidities or a more advanced age are less aggressively treated with respect to combination therapy, the outcome of monotherapy in these patients appears to be comparable to that of dual or triple therapy in «typical» PAH patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. 28-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satya Dash ◽  
Lawrence A. Leiter

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document