Hydrogen wettability of clays: Implications for underground hydrogen storage

2021 ◽  
Vol 46 (69) ◽  
pp. 34356-34361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Al-Yaseri ◽  
Domenik Wolff-Boenisch ◽  
Cut Aja Fauziah ◽  
Stefan Iglauer
2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (36) ◽  
pp. 22987-23003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain Le Duigou ◽  
Anne-Gaëlle Bader ◽  
Jean-Christophe Lanoix ◽  
Lionel Nadau

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orsolya Gelencsér ◽  
Zsuzsanna Szabó-Krausz ◽  
László Mika ◽  
Daniel Breitner ◽  
Tibor Németh ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
Esteban R. Ugarte ◽  
Saeed Salehi

Abstract Renewable energy production is limited by the fluctuations limiting their application. Underground Hydrogen Storage (UHS) is one possible alternative to reduce the gap between supply and demand by storing the energy converted to hydrogen as a carrier and store it during surplus to produce it during high demand periods. The hydrogen is stored in the subsurface in geological formations containing the gas and is injected/produced via wells. There is a lack of experience associated with this technology and only a small number of projects worldwide. There are several mechanisms that can compromise the integrity of the well and generate leakage of the stored gas. This paper aims to introduce the challenges associated with well integrity of UHS. Mechanisms that can compromise well integrity and generate leaks include microbial corrosion, hydrogen blistering hydrogen induced cracking and hydrogen embrittlement, cement degradation, elastomer failure, and caprock sealing failure. Propose well completion criteria, recommendation, and materials selection for newly constructed wells or existing wells. A comparison with more developed storage technologies aims to provide a better understanding of the limitations of hydrogen storage by comparing it to carbon dioxide (Carbon Capture and Storage) and methane (Underground Gas Storage). Finally, evaluation and monitoring techniques are required to see the influence of hydrogen on well integrity. Future research and development will reduce the uncertainties and limitations associated with UHS increasing its feasibility and implementation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 3365-3378
Author(s):  
Zachary Taie ◽  
Gertrude Villaverde ◽  
Jennifer Speaks Morris ◽  
Zoe Lavrich ◽  
Anna Chittum ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 461-499
Author(s):  
Nasiru Salahu Muhammed ◽  
Bashirul Haq ◽  
Dhafer Al Shehri ◽  
Amir Al-Ahmed ◽  
Mohammed Mizanur Rahman ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 2282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Hemme ◽  
Wolfgang van Berk

Underground hydrogen storage is a potential way to balance seasonal fluctuations in energy production from renewable energies. The risks of hydrogen storage in depleted gas fields include the conversion of hydrogen to CH4(g) and H2S(g) due to microbial activity, gas–water–rock interactions in the reservoir and cap rock, which are connected with porosity changes, and the loss of aqueous hydrogen by diffusion through the cap rock brine. These risks lead to loss of hydrogen and thus to a loss of energy. A hydrogeochemical modeling approach is developed to analyze these risks and to understand the basic hydrogeochemical mechanisms of hydrogen storage over storage times at the reservoir scale. The one-dimensional diffusive mass transport model is based on equilibrium reactions for gas–water–rock interactions and kinetic reactions for sulfate reduction and methanogenesis. The modeling code is PHREEQC (pH-REdox-EQuilibrium written in the C programming language). The parameters that influence the hydrogen loss are identified. Crucial parameters are the amount of available electron acceptors, the storage time, and the kinetic rate constants. Hydrogen storage causes a slight decrease in porosity of the reservoir rock. Loss of aqueous hydrogen by diffusion is minimal. A wide range of conditions for optimized hydrogen storage in depleted gas fields is identified.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document