Exploring the use of Mobile applications by cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A scoping review

2020 ◽  
Vol 144 ◽  
pp. 104293
Author(s):  
Bruno Magalhães ◽  
Carla Fernandes ◽  
Juan Miguel Martinez-Galiano ◽  
Célia Santos
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-34
Author(s):  
Lucrezia Savioni ◽  
Stefano Triberti ◽  
Ilaria Durosini ◽  
Valeria Sebri ◽  
Gabriella Pravettoni

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110414
Author(s):  
Jennifer Clesham ◽  
Helen Reynolds ◽  
Peter J Carr

Introduction: The extent of vascular/venous access device (VAD) research output from the Island of Ireland is unknown. The identification of the papers available is important to create a future research agenda. Objectives: The main objective of this study is to answer three questions: What is the number and descriptive quality of reported Vascular Access Device literature from the Island of Ireland? Is the reporting of Catheter Related Infection rates for cancer patients common in Irish Hospital Groups, National Cancer Reports and Publication Outputs? What are the implications for future research in this area? Methods: We used a scoping review and searched selected databases, grey literature and hospital regulatory bodies websites following the Joanna Briggs Institute Guidelines 2017. A data charting form was developed based on a template from the Joanna Briggs Institute and this was used to extract data from the included reports. Results: A total of 660 reports were screened. Sixty-one full text articles were reviewed from which 20 reports were included for data extraction. Of the reports included the following designs were used: nine retrospective study designs, four guidelines, two prospective study designs, two literature reviews and one of the following; survey, case study and cross sectional analysis designs. We did not identify any randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, meta-synthesis and scoping reviews. Five studies included catheter related infection rates. Gaps in the research include the collection of data sets and the need to establish a VAD registry; develop core outcomes for VADs; assessment and evaluation of VAD care bundles among cancer patients; and, the inclusion of public and patient involvement in future VAD research. Conclusion: The reporting of VAD outcomes in published literature regarding cancer patients receiving treatment in Ireland is inconsistent and varied with no interventional studies addressing vascular access complications in cancer care.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Muñoz-Saavedra ◽  
Lourdes Miró-Amarante ◽  
Manuel Domínguez-Morales

Augmented reality and virtual reality technologies are increasing in popularity. Augmented reality has thrived to date mainly on mobile applications, with games like Pokémon Go or the new Google Maps utility as some of its ambassadors. On the other hand, virtual reality has been popularized mainly thanks to the videogame industry and cheaper devices. However, what was initially a failure in the industrial field is resurfacing in recent years thanks to the technological improvements in devices and processing hardware. In this work, an in-depth study of the different fields in which augmented and virtual reality have been used has been carried out. This study focuses on conducting a thorough scoping review focused on these new technologies, where the evolution of each of them during the last years in the most important categories and in the countries most involved in these technologies will be analyzed. Finally, we will analyze the future trend of these technologies and the areas in which it is necessary to investigate to further integrate these technologies into society.


Health Policy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 124 (9) ◽  
pp. 1008-1016
Author(s):  
Fatou Bagayogo ◽  
Mélanie Le Berre ◽  
Christian Ruchon ◽  
Jean-Louis Denis ◽  
Lise Lamothe ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evelien R. Spelten ◽  
Olaf Geerse ◽  
Julia Vuuren ◽  
Jennifer Timmis ◽  
Bev Blanch ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
Anum Irfan Khan ◽  
Erin Arthurs ◽  
Sharon Gradin ◽  
Marnie MacKinnon ◽  
Vishal Kukreti

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 15 ◽  
pp. 2763-2781
Author(s):  
Xuejing Li ◽  
Meiqi Meng ◽  
Junqiang Zhao ◽  
Xiaoyan Zhang ◽  
Dan Yang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiomara Skrabal Ross ◽  
Kate M Gunn ◽  
Pandora Patterson ◽  
Ian Olver

BACKGROUND Adherence to oral chemotherapy is crucial to maximize treatment outcomes and avoid health complications in cancer patients. Mobile phones are widely available worldwide, and evidence that this technology can be successfully employed to increase medication adherence for the treatment of other chronic diseases (eg, diabetes) is well established. However, the extent to which there is evidence that mobile phone–based interventions improve adherence to oral chemotherapy is unknown. OBJECTIVE This scoping review aims to explore what is known about mobile phone–delivered interventions designed to enhance adherence to oral chemotherapy, to examine the reported findings on the utility of these interventions in increasing oral chemotherapy adherence, and to identify opportunities for development of future interventions. METHODS This study followed Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review methodological framework. RESULTS The review search yielded 5 studies reporting on 4 interventions with adults (aged >18 years) diagnosed with diverse cancer types. All interventions were considered acceptable, useful, and feasible. The following themes were evident: text messages and mobile apps were the main methods of delivering these interventions, the 2 most commonly employed oral chemotherapy adherence–enhancing strategies were management and reporting of drug-related symptoms and reminders to take medication, the importance of stakeholders’ engagement in intervention design, and the overall positive perceptions of delivery features. Areas for future research identified by this review include the need for further studies to evaluate the impact of mobile phone–delivered interventions on adherence to oral chemotherapy as well as the relevance for future studies to incorporate design frameworks and economic evaluations and to explore the moderator effect of high anxiety, poor baseline adherence, and longer time taking prescribed drug on adherence to oral chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Despite the increasing body of evidence on the use of mobile phones to deliver medication adherence–enhancing interventions in chronic diseases, literature on the oral chemotherapy context is lacking. This review showed that existing interventions are highly acceptable and useful to cancer patients. The engagement of stakeholders as well as the use of a design framework are important elements in the development of mobile phone–delivered interventions that can be translated into oncology settings.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Grainger ◽  
Hemakumar Devan ◽  
Bahram Sangelaji ◽  
Jean Hay-Smith

BACKGROUND An emerging literature describes systematic reviews of the app stores to identify mobile applications (apps) to support diagnosis, assessment or management of health conditions. There are currently no guidelines for the conduct and reporting of methods of these studies. The first step in developing guidelines is to evaluate current reporting of methods of systematic reviews of health apps. OBJECTIVE The aims of this scoping review were: 1. To identify what parts of the ‘usual’ methods of systematic review are used and adapted in app-focused systematic reviews; 2. To describe how methods of critical appraisal are adapted and done; and 3. To assess what clinical recommendations are made and the ‘strength’ of those recommendations. METHODS A systematic search of seven databases was undertaken to identify app-focused systematic reviews meeting the inclusion criteria: (1) the article was “systematic” defined by “systematic review” in the title OR an a priori systematic search procedure described in the article methods OR the app search process described based on PRISMA standard flow diagram; (2) the article described a systematic search for apps in at least one app store; (3) the article focused on a named health condition; and (4) the focus of the article was apps for people with any diagnosed acute or chronic health condition or for clinicians in direct clinical care. Articles were excluded if not in English, focused on general or psychological health or nutrition. A data extraction template was created based on standard data elements in PRISMA guidelines. The extracted data from the included articles were summarised by frequencies. RESULTS From 2798 records, 26 of the 177 potentially eligible full text articles were included. In the 26 included app-focused systematic reviews, many of the typical procedures of a systematic review as operationalized for app-focused reviews were not reported at all, or not clearly reported. Absences, lack of clarity or completeness of reporting occured in: a priori review protocol registration or following a reporting guideline; the processes of screening apps in the app stores; the data extracted from app store description or the device the app was downloaded to for data extraction; and appraisal tools for assessing the app quality, usability or clinical content. Further, there was no explicit reporting of clinical efficacy of apps or recommendations for use in the majority of reviews. CONCLUSIONS The reporting of methods used in app-focused systematic reviews is variable and could be substantially improved. Development and publication of consensus reporting guidelines would increase transparency and quality of published studies. A repository for registration of reviews would ensure reviews are easy to find and not duplicated. These steps would also enable clinicians and people with health conditions to more easily find high quality apps.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document