Neuraxial anesthesia in a patient with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis in pregnancy: management for cesarean delivery and oophorectomy

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 104-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Demma ◽  
S. Norris ◽  
J. Dolak
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Neuraxial Anesthesia ◽  
Aspartate Receptor ◽  
In Pregnancy

scholarly journals Anesthetic management in cesarean delivery of women with placenta previa: a retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dazhi Fan ◽  
Jiaming Rao ◽  
Dongxin Lin ◽  
Huishan Zhang ◽  
Zixing Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Placenta Previa ◽  
Neuraxial Anesthesia ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Maternal And Neonatal Outcomes

Abstract Background The incidence of placenta preiva is rising. Cesarean delivery is identified as the only safe and appropriate mode of delivery for pregnancies with placenta previa. Anesthesia is important during the cesarean delivery. The aim of this study is to assess maternal and neonatal outcomes of patients with placenta previa managed with neuraxial anesthesia as compared to those who underwent general anesthesia during cesarean delivery. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed of all patients with placenta preiva at our large academic institution from January 1, 2014 to June 30, 2019. Patients were managed neuraxial anesthesia and general anesthesia during cesarean delivery. Results We identified 1234 patients with placenta previa who underwent cesarean delivery at our institution. Neuraxial anesthesia was performed in 737 (59.7%), and general anesthesia was completed in 497 (40.3%) patients. The mean estimated blood loss at neuraxial anesthesia of 558.96 ± 42.77 ml were significantly lower than the estimated blood loss at general anesthesia of 1952.51 ± 180 ml (p < 0.001). One hundred and forty-six of 737 (19.8%) patients required blood transfusion at neuraxial anesthesia, whereas 381 out of 497 (76.7%) patients required blood transfusion at general anesthesia. The rate neonatal asphyxia and admission to NICU at neuraxial anesthesia was significantly lower than general anesthesia (2.7% vs. 19.5 and 18.2% vs. 44.1%, respectively). After adjusting confounding factors, blood loss was less, Apgar score at 1- and 5-min were higher, and the rate of blood transfusion, neonatal asphyxia, and admission to NICU were lower in the neuraxial group. Conclusions Our data demonstrated that neuraxial anesthesia is associated with better maternal and neonatal outcomes during cesarean delivery in women with placenta previa.

CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND FETO-MATERNAL OUTCOMES IN PREGNANT WOMEN WITH COVID -19 INFECTIONS

2021 ◽  
pp. 30-32
Author(s):  
Gulshan Bano ◽  
Anubha Prashad ◽  
Rakhee Soni ◽  
Mohammed Mishal
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Maternal Outcomes ◽  
Hypertensive Disorder ◽  
Co Morbidity ◽  
Hypertensive Disorder Of Pregnancy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
In Pregnancy

Background and objectives:-COVID-19 is ongoing pandemic, caused by novel Corona Virus. There is very scarce information is available about clinical features and feto-maternal outcomes of COVID-19 in pregnancy. Therefore, this study was aimed to determine clinical characteristics and feto-maternal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19. Methods- In this retrospective study, we included all pregnant women admitted with COVID-19 over three months. Clinical features, laboratory ndings and feto-maternal outcomes were assessed.Results:-The mean age of the patients was 24 years. Hypertensive disorder of pregnancy was most common associated co-morbidity. Majority of patients (81%) were asymptomatic. Lymphocytopenia was seen in 58% of the patients and 47% had elevated levels of CRP. All patients who presented in rst trimester had spontaneous abortion. There is relatively higher rate of preterm birth (21%) and cesarean delivery(43%). All the neonates were tested negative for COVID-19. Conclusion;- There is relatively higher rate of cesarean delivery. Overall feto-maternal outcome was good and there was no evidence of vertical transmission.

scholarly journals Refractory hypotension under neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery

2019 ◽  
Vol 132 (12) ◽  
pp. 1509-1511
Author(s):  
Shu-Ying Li ◽  
Xiao-Jing Chen ◽  
Xue-Mei Lin
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Neuraxial Anesthesia ◽  
Refractory Hypotension

Adverse Events and Factors Associated with Potentially Avoidable Use of General Anesthesia in Cesarean Deliveries

2019 ◽  
Vol 130 (6) ◽  
pp. 912-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Guglielminotti ◽  
Ruth Landau ◽  
Guohua Li
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Adjusted Odds Ratio ◽  
Neuraxial Anesthesia ◽  
General Anesthetics ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Anesthesia Complications

Abstract Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New Background Compared with neuraxial anesthesia, general anesthesia for cesarean delivery is associated with increased risk of maternal adverse events. Reducing avoidable general anesthetics for cesarean delivery may improve safety of obstetric anesthesia care. This study examined adverse events, trends, and factors associated with potentially avoidable general anesthetics for cesarean delivery. Methods This retrospective study analyzed cesarean delivery cases without a recorded indication for general anesthesia or contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia in New York State hospitals, 2003 to 2014. Adverse events included anesthesia complications (systemic, neuraxial-related, and drug-related), surgical site infection, venous thromboembolism, and the composite of death or cardiac arrest. Anesthesia complications were defined as severe if associated with death, organ failure, or prolonged hospital stay. Results During the study period, 466,014 cesarean deliveries without a recorded indication for general anesthesia or contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia were analyzed; 26,431 were completed with general anesthesia (5.7%). The proportion of avoidable general anesthetics decreased from 5.6% in 2003 to 2004 to 4.8% in 2013 to 2014 (14% reduction; P &lt; 0.001). Avoidable general anesthetics were associated with significantly increased risk of anesthesia complications (adjusted odds ratio, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.4 to 1.9), severe complications (adjusted odds ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.6 to 5.2), surgical site infection (adjusted odds ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.5 to 2.1), and venous thromboembolism (adjusted odds ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.0), but not of death or cardiac arrest. Labor neuraxial analgesia rate was one of the most actionable hospital-level factors associated with avoidable general anesthetics. Relative to hospitals with a rate greater than or equal to 75%, the adjusted odds ratio of avoidable general anesthetics increased to 1.3 (95% CI, 1.2 to 1.4), 1.6 (95% CI, 1.5 to 1.7), and 3.2 (95% CI, 3.0 to 3.5) as the rate decreased to 50 to 74.9%, 25 to 49.9%, and less than 25%, respectively. Conclusions Compared with neuraxial anesthesia, avoidable general anesthetics are associated with increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes.

Pragmatic approach to neuraxial anesthesia in obstetric patients with disorders of the vertebral column, spinal cord and neuromuscular system

2020 ◽  
pp. rapm-2020-101792
Author(s):  
Elisa Walsh ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Hannah Madden ◽  
James Lehrich ◽  
Lisa Leffert
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Vertebral Column ◽  
Retrospective Studies ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Neuraxial Anesthesia ◽  
Neuromuscular System ◽  
Patient Harm ◽  
Mechanical Interference ◽  
Obstetrical Patient

Neuraxial anesthesia provides optimal labor analgesia and cesarean delivery anesthesia. Obstetric patients with disorders of the vertebral column, spinal cord and neuromuscular system present unique challenges to the anesthesiologist. Potential concerns include mechanical interference, patient injury and the need for imaging. Unfortunately, the existing literature regarding neuraxial anesthesia in these patients is largely limited to case series and rare retrospective studies. The lack of practice guidance may lead to unwarranted fear of patient harm and subsequent avoidance of neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery or neuraxial analgesia for labor, with additional risks of exposure to general anesthesia. In this narrative review, we use available evidence to recommend a framework when considering neuraxial anesthesia for an obstetrical patient with neuraxial pathology.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document