Retrospective analysis and verification of efficacy after surgical implantation of an SPG-microstimulator in patients with chronic cluster headache (CCH) – long-term results of 82 patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 152-153
Author(s):  
A.T. Assaf ◽  
J. Harms ◽  
P. Stude ◽  
H.J. Hambitzer ◽  
M. Gosau ◽  
...  
Neurosurgery ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 1252-1257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Donnet ◽  
Manabu Tamura ◽  
Dominique Valade ◽  
Jean Régis

Abstract OBJECTIVE We have previously reported short-term results of a prospective open trial designed to evaluate trigeminal nerve radiosurgical treatment in intractable chronic cluster headache (CCH). Medium- and long-term results have not yet been reported. METHODS Ten patients presenting with a severe and drug-resistant CCH were enrolled (nine men, one woman). The radiosurgical treatment was performed according to the technique usually used for trigeminal neuralgia in our department. A single 4-mm shot was positioned at the level of the cisternal portion of the trigeminal nerve. The median distance between the center of the shot and the emergence of the nerve was 9.35 mm (range, 7.5–13.3 mm). The median of this maximum dose to the brainstem was 8.0 Gy (range, 4.0–11.1 Gy). Mean age was 49.8 years (range, 32–77 yr). Mean duration of the CCH was 9 years (range, 2–33 yr). The mean follow-up period was 36.3 months (range, 24–48 mo). RESULTS Two patients had complete relief of CCH. One patient had a good result with evolution in an episodic form. Seven patients had no improvement. Nine patients developed a new trigeminal nerve disturbance: three developed paresthesia with no hypoesthesia and six developed hypoesthesia, including two patients with deafferentation pain. Only one patient had neither paresthesia nor hypoesthesia. CONCLUSION We confirmed, with medium- and long-term evaluation, the high rate of toxicity and failure of the technique. The high toxicity, despite a methodology identical to the one used in trigeminal neuralgia, leads us to suspect an underlying specificity of the nerve in CCH. We do not recommend radiosurgery for treatment of intractable CCH.


2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 215-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Seijo-Fernandez ◽  
Antonio Saiz ◽  
Elena Santamarta ◽  
Lydia Nader ◽  
Marco Antonio Alvarez-Vega ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Dana ◽  
Zagorka Péjin ◽  
Céline Cadilhac ◽  
Philippe Wicart ◽  
Christophe Glorion ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Arne May ◽  
Peter J Goadsby ◽  
◽  

The trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias are a group of primary headache disorders characterised by unilateral trigeminal distribution of pain that occurs in association with ipsilateral cranial autonomic features. The most prominent one is cluster headache, a dreadful disease with excrutiating pain attacks. These attacks last no longer than two hours but may occur several times per day. It is mandatory to find an efficient therapy for these patients, but some are unresponsive to all treatments. In these intractable cases invasive procedures are introduced, but the available evidence (while conflicting) illustrates that trigeminal denervation may not be effective in preventing the headache attacks or autonomic symptoms of chronic cluster headache. Modern neurostimulating approaches, such as stimulation of the greater occipital nerve and hypothalamic deep brain stimulation, supersede neurodestructive procedures. Both stimulation methods are exquisite and potentially lifesaving treatment options in otherwise intractable patients, but they need to be better characterised and further long-term data are needed.


Cephalalgia ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 719-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Lampl ◽  
Bernhard Haider ◽  
Christine Schweiger

Cephalalgia ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 1156-1169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Ambrosini ◽  
Jean Schoenen

Background In many patients suffering from primary headaches, the available pharmacological and behavioural treatments are not satisfactory. This is a review of (minimally) invasive interventions targeting pericranial nerves that could be effective in refractory patients. Methods The interventions we will cover have in common pericranial nerves as targets, but are distinct according to their rationale, modality and invasiveness. They range from nerve blocks/infiltrations to the percutaneous implantation of neurostimulators and surgical decompression procedures. We have critically analysed the published data (PubMed) on their effectiveness and tolerability. Results and conclusions There is clear evidence for a preventative effect of suboccipital injections of local anaesthetics and/or steroids in cluster headache, while evidence for such an effect is weak in migraine. Percutaneous occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) provides significant long-term relief in more than half of drug-resistant chronic cluster headache patients, but no sham-controlled trial has tested this. The evidence that ONS has lasting beneficial effects in chronic migraine is at best equivocal. Suboccipital infiltrations are quasi-devoid of side effects, while ONS is endowed with numerous, though reversible, adverse events. Claims that surgical decompression of multiple pericranial nerves is effective in migraine are not substantiated by large, rigorous, randomized and sham-controlled trials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document