Postoperative Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Spine Metastases: A Critical Review to Guide Practice

2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (5) ◽  
pp. 1414-1428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin J. Redmond ◽  
Simon S. Lo ◽  
Charles Fisher ◽  
Arjun Sahgal
2020 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin J. Redmond ◽  
Daniel Sciubba ◽  
Majid Khan ◽  
Chengcheng Gui ◽  
Sheng-fu Larry Lo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Y. Moraes ◽  
Xuguang Chen ◽  
Michael Yan ◽  
Daniel E. Spratt ◽  
Kristen Redmond ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 537-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marsha L. Haley ◽  
Peter C. Gerszten ◽  
Dwight E. Heron ◽  
Yue-Fang Chang ◽  
Dave S. Atteberry ◽  
...  

Object The objective of this study was to compare the palliative efficacy and cost effectiveness of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as primary treatment for bone metastatic disease of the spinal column. Methods Forty-four patients were matched based on age, primary tumor site, year of treatment, and location of metastasis. Outcomes of interest were pain relief, cost-effectiveness, toxicities, and need for further intervention. Pain relief was rated as excellent, good, fair, or poor, using a radiosurgical pain scale to combine visual analog scale and verbal descriptor ordinal scale scores. Medicare fee schedules were used to compute the charges for both the technical and professional components of care. Patients in the EBRT group were treated using a linear accelerator while patients in the SBRT group were treated with the CyberKnife robotic radiosurgery system. Patients received regular follow-up evaluations by a radiation oncologist and neurosurgeon. Results Forty-four patients (22 pairs) were analyzed. At a follow-up of 1 month, there was no statistically significant difference in pain between the 2 groups (p = 0.11). Patients who underwent SBRT had the highest total gross charge; depending on technique, EBRT treatments ranged from 29% to 71% of the SBRT charge. Patients treated using EBRT had more acute toxicities, and more of these patients underwent further intervention at the treated spinal level. There were no late complications attributed to either treatment modality. Conclusions External beam radiation therapy remains an efficacious and cost-effective method of palliation of spine metastases. In this study, patients treated with EBRT had more acute toxicities and were more likely to require additional interventions at the treated sites. Stereotactic body radiation therapy, although more costly, resulted in comparable rates of pain relief and late treatment-related toxicity, and continues to show promise as an emerging modality for selected patients with spine metastases.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 153303382090444
Author(s):  
Antonio Pontoriero ◽  
Giuseppe Iatì ◽  
Alberto Cacciola ◽  
Alfredo Conti ◽  
Anna Brogna ◽  
...  

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with spine metastases maximizes local tumor control and preserves neurologic function. A novel approach could be the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost delivering modality. The aim of the present study is to report our experience in the treatment of spine metastases using a frameless radiosurgery system delivering stereotactic body radiation therapy–simultaneous integrated boost technique. The primary endpoints were the pain control and the time to local progression; the secondary ones were the overall survival and toxicity. A total of 20 patients with spine metastases and 22 metastatic sites were treated in our center with stereotactic body radiation therapy–simultaneous integrated boost between December 2007 and July 2018. Stereotactic body radiation therapy–simultaneous integrated boost treatments were delivered doses of 8 to 10 Gy in 1 fraction to isodose line of 50%. The median follow-up was 35 months (range: 12-110). The median time to local progression for all patients was not reached and the actuarial 1-, 2-, and 3-years local free progression rate was 86.36%. In 17 of 20 patients, a complete pain remission was observed and 3 of 20 patients had a partial pain remission (complete pain remission + partial pain remission: 100%). The median overall survival was 38 months (range 12-83). None of the patients experienced neither radiation adverse events (grade 1-4) nor reported pain flair reaction. None of the patients included in our series experienced vertebral compression fracture. Spine radiosurgery with stereotactic body radiation therapy–simultaneous integrated boost is safe. The use of this modality in spine metastases patients provides an excellent local control.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document