Mebendazole Potentiates Radiation Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

e12073 Background: For T1-2N0M0 breast cancer after surgery and axillary staging, the current NCCN guideline recommends radiation therapy (RT) after lumpectomy but not total mastectomy unless there is a positive or less than 1 mm negative margin. This recommendation is regardless of hormonal status. Triple-negative breast cancer is a generally considered more aggressive compared with hormone positive breast cancer. We sought to investigate whether there is a survival benefit of RT in T1-2N0M0 TNBC. Methods: A Population-based retrospective analysis was performed using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients included in the analysis were divided into three groups according to surgery modality and RT: breast conservation therapy (BCT, i.e., lumpectomy + RT), mastectomy alone, and mastectomy + RT. The survival endpoints were breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS), and survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 22473 female with T1-2N0M0 TNBC diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were included, with 13395 (60%) T1 and 9078 (40%) T2 cases. Surgery, RT and chemotherapy was done in 21674 (96%), 9633 (43%) and 14651 (65%) patients, respectively. Patients who underwent RT were older ( > 50 years, 78% vs 72%, P< 0.001), had fewer T2 (35% vs 44%, P< 0.001) tumor, and had more chemotherapy utilization (72% vs 60%, P< 0.001). 8807 patients had BCT; 8329 had mastectomy alone and 635 had mastectomy + RT. The 5-year BCSS rate was 94.3% for BCT, 93.3% for mastectomy alone ( P= 0.009 vs BCT), and 83.7% for mastectomy + RT ( P< 0.001 vs BCT and P< 0.001 vs mastectomy alone), respectively. The 5-year OS rate was 88.6% for BCT, 83.0 % for mastectomy alone ( P< 0.001 vs BCT), and 79.6% for mastectomy + RT ( P< 0.001 vs BCT and P= 0.190 vs mastectomy alone), respectively. Conclusions: In patients with T1-2N0M0 TNBC, BCT was associated with superior BCSS and OS compared to mastectomy with or without RT. After mastectomy, there was no evidence of survival benefit of RT, with worse BCSS and similar OS.

Download Full-text

SEER-Medicare study of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: Real-world treatment patterns, survival, and expenditures 2010 to 2016.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e12512 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e12512-e12512

Author(s):

Jan Sieluk ◽

Amin Haiderali ◽

Min Huang ◽

Lingfeng Yang ◽

Konstantinos Tryfonidis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Radiation Therapy ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽

Triple Negative ◽

Early Stage ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Breast Cancers ◽

The Us ◽

Poor Outcomes

e12512 Background: In the US, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents about 10–20% of breast cancers. Current information about the clinical and economic burden of early-stage TNBC in elderly patients is lacking. Methods: We used the SEER-Medicare database to identify patients with continuous Medicare Parts A/B enrollment, ≥66 years old, newly diagnosed between 2010 - 2015 (followed until 2016) with stage II-III TNBC, who initiated systemic neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant (including chemotherapy and radiation) therapy. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) from diagnosis were estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM). Healthcare costs were determined during neoadjuvant and adjuvant periods. Results: Of 1569 patients ( > 99% women), 94 (6%) received neoadjuvant therapy, 1162 (74%) received adjuvant therapy, and 313 (20%) received both (neo/adj; Table). Age and race/ethnicity distributions were comparable in the three cohorts. Primary tumor T stage was T1c/T2 for 43%, 83%, and 58% in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and neo/adj, respectively, and T3 for 14%, 10%, and 15%, respectively. The most common systemic regimens in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant periods were a taxane +/- anthracycline; 21% and 67% of patients in adjuvant and neo/adj cohorts received radiation therapy after surgery. Most claims were for outpatient treatment; hospitalizations were uncommon. The total mean expenditures per patient per month were US$10,620 and $24,408 during neoadjuvant and adjuvant periods, respectively. Conclusions: This study provides insights into patient characteristics, as well as clinical and economic outcomes for elderly patients with early-stage TNBC, treated from 2010-2016 in the US, highlighting the high monetary burden of TNBC and poor outcomes associated with stage III patients. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text