scholarly journals The future of surgical training in the context of the ‘Shape of Training’ Review: Consensus recommendations by the Association of Surgeons in Training

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. S5-S9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhiannon L. Harries ◽  
Adam P. Williams ◽  
Henry J.M. Ferguson ◽  
Helen M. Mohan ◽  
Andrew J. Beamish ◽  
...  
Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Rogers ◽  
Anthony J. DeSantis ◽  
Haroon Janjua ◽  
Tara M. Barry ◽  
Paul C. Kuo

2007 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-14
Author(s):  
L Williams

The surgical training system in the UK has long been considered to be of a very high standard. However, it is currently under threat from many changes. To assure the quality of the future surgical consultant workforce we have moved away from apprentice-type training towards more ordered education. Although the reduction in hours and years will mean less overall experience there is a genuine belief that improved education and assessment can compensate. It says much for our island mentality that although we belong to the EU we consider European surgical training to be distinct from our own.


Author(s):  
IE Yardley ◽  
CM Rees ◽  
PD Losty

Traditionally, in UK-based surgical training, the majority of trainees spend a period of time out of clinical training undertaking research, usually leading to the award of a postgraduate degree or thesis (MD or PhD). The intention of this was to supplement clinical with academic training that developed skills such as critical appraisal, independent working and systematic thinking to enrich future surgical practice. The opportunity for academic activity is a significant factor in choosing a surgical career for many trainees.


2016 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. S14-S19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vimal J. Gokani ◽  
Adam Peckham-Cooper ◽  
David Bunting ◽  
Andrew J. Beamish ◽  
Adam Williams ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 93 (10) ◽  
pp. 358-360
Author(s):  
Humphrey Scott ◽  
Vicky Ridley-Pearson ◽  
Adrian Horwood

In 2011 a national selection pilot project into core surgical training (CST) at entry level, CT1, took place within England and Wales. Its unique model succeeded with a 100% fill rate and is a strong platform for national selection into CST in the future.


2007 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 94-96
Author(s):  
P Durani ◽  
P Rajan ◽  
A Menon ◽  
RS Pickard

The Modernising Medical Careers changes to higher surgical training are almost upon us. Selection into ST1–3 has begun, but what are the most important selection criteria and how have they changed from the old Calman-system? Applicants are desperate to succeed but when it comes to knowing what specialty programme directors look for in a candidate, they have little to go on. This paper goes some way to answering these questions and perhaps gives applicants some useful insight into the minds of those with the power to say 'yes'.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document