The association between reduced folate carrier-1 gene 80G/A polymorphism and methotrexate efficacy or methotrexate related-toxicity in rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 8-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
XiaoBing Li ◽  
MingCai Hu ◽  
WanPing Li ◽  
Li Gu ◽  
MeiJuan Chen ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802110020
Author(s):  
Shaik Mohammad Naushad ◽  
Salman A. Alrokayan ◽  
Fahad N. Almajhdi ◽  
Tajamul Hussain

Background: Methotrexate (MTX) is an antirheumatic drug, transported by reduced folate carrier-1 (RFC1). The most common RFC1 gene variant, c.80 A>G (rs1051266) is ambiguously linked to adverse effects of MTX therapy in some rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Objective: The purpose of meta-analysis was to summarize all major published studies on c.80 A>G SNP to clarify this ambiguity in MTX therapy. Methods: A total of 18 studies representing 3592 RA patients comprising 699 men and 2893 women were included. Both fixed and random effect models were applied to study the data. Results: The RFC1 80A-allele showed null association with MTX-mediated toxicity in both fixed (odds ratio [OR] = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.80-1.03) and random effects (OR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.71-1.11) models. Because heterogeneity was observed in this association ( P = 0.0006), data were segregated based on use of folate therapy. In 7 studies (n = 1191) where folate was used along with MTX, RFC1 AA patients showed reduced risk for MTX-mediated toxicity (OR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.50-0.89; P = 0.0006). The RFC1 80A-allele was found to increase the efficacy of MTX therapy by 1.53-fold (95% CI: 1.24-1.88), whereas the 80AA-genotype increased the efficacy by 1.85-fold (95% CI: 1.41-2.42). No publication bias was observed in these associations. Conclusion and Relevance: RFC1 c.80 A>G is an important pharmacogenetic determinant of MTX therapy in RA. The RFC1 80A-allele robustly increased therapeutic efficacy and safety when folate was used along with MTX. Findings are relevant to decision-making in the clinical use of MTX as a treatment for RA patients harboring the RFC1 gene variant.


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 249-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tessa Sanderson ◽  
Jo Angouri

The active involvement of patients in decision-making and the focus on patient expertise in managing chronic illness constitutes a priority in many healthcare systems including the NHS in the UK. With easier access to health information, patients are almost expected to be (or present self) as an ‘expert patient’ (Ziebland 2004). This paper draws on the meta-analysis of interview data collected for identifying treatment outcomes important to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Taking a discourse approach to identity, the discussion focuses on the resources used in the negotiation and co-construction of expert identities, including domain-specific knowledge, access to institutional resources, and ability to self-manage. The analysis shows that expertise is both projected (institutionally sanctioned) and claimed by the patient (self-defined). We close the paper by highlighting the limitations of our pilot study and suggest avenues for further research.


2021 ◽  
Vol 160 (6) ◽  
pp. S-357
Author(s):  
Jalpa Patel ◽  
Dina Fakhouri ◽  
Mohamed Noureldin ◽  
Iris Kovar-Gough ◽  
Francis A. Farraye ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Varitsara Mangkorntongsakul ◽  
Kevin Phan ◽  
Saxon D. Smith

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Liu ◽  
Xiang Meng ◽  
Yanfang Ma ◽  
Huizhen Li ◽  
Yuqi Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Total glucosides of paeony (TGP), an active compound extracted from the roots of Paeonia lactiflora Pallas, has been increasingly used as the adjunctive therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Though TGP could mitigate the unanticipated adverse effects during the conventional treatment of RA, high-quality evidence-based meta-analysis data on this subject are still insufficient. The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical safety of TGP adjuvant therapy in the RA treatment. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, China Network Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), SinoMed and WanFang Data were retrieved for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort study about TGP adjuvant therapy in patients with RA up to 28 January 2021. Literatures with eligibility criteria and information were screened and extracted by two researchers independently. The RevMan5.3 software was used for data analysis with effect estimates as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results A total of 39 studies involving 3680 RA participants were included. There were 8 comparisons: TGP plus methotrexate (MTX) therapy versus MTX therapy, TGP plus leflunomide (LEF) therapy versus LEF therapy, TGP plus MTX and LEF therapy versus MTX plus LEF therapy, TGP plus tripterygium glycosides (TG) therapy versus TG therapy, TGP plus meloxicam (MLX) therapy versus MLX therapy and TGP plus sulfasalazine (SSZ) therapy versus SSZ therapy, TGP plus iguratimod (IGU) therapy versus IGU therapy, TGP plus prednisone acetate tablets (PAT) therapy versus PAT therapy. The meta-analysis results showed that the occurrence of hepatic adverse effect (RR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.23–0.41, P < 0.00001) and leukopenia (RR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.26–0.66, P = 0.0002) in TGP adjuvant therapy was significant decreased compared with non-TGP therapy. However, only TGP plus LEF therapy (RR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.08–0.60, P = 0.003) and TGP plus MTX and LEF therapy (RR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.22–0.42, P < 0.00001) had statistical difference in the subgroups of hepatic adverse effect. In leukopenia, TGP plus MTX and LEF therapy (RR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.25–0.87, P = 0.02) had statistical difference. Conclusions This meta-analysis indicated that TGP adjuvant therapy might alleviate the incidence of hepatic adverse effect and leukopenia for the RA treatment compared to non-TGP therapy. The clinical safety of TGP adjuvant therapy warrant further investigation in experimental studies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos Bissias ◽  
Angelos Kaspiris ◽  
Athanasios Kalogeropoulos ◽  
Konstantinos Papoutsis ◽  
Nikolaos Natsioulas ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives The increasing number of hip arthroplasties (HA), due to the growing elderly population, is associated with the risk of femoral periprosthetic fractures (FPFs). The purpose of this study was to identify potential risk factors for the development of FPFs after HA. Methods A systematic review was conducted in five data bases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Cinahl, ICTRP) according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines up to May 2019, using the key words “risk factor,” “periprosthetic fracture,” and “hip replacement or arthroplasty.” Meta-analysis of the clinical outcomes of HA and subgroup analysis based on the factors that were implicated in FPFs was performed. Results Sixteen studies were included (sample size: 599,551 HA patients, 4253 FPFs, incidence 0.71%). Risk factors statistically associated with increased incidence of FPFs were female gender (+ 40%), previous revision arthroplasty surgery (× 3 times), and the presence of rheumatoid arthritis (× 2.1 times), while osteoarthritis (− 57%), cement application (− 59%), and insertion of Biomet (− 68%) or Thompson’s prosthesis (− 75%) were correlated with low prevalence of FPFs. Obesity, cardiac diseases, advanced age, bad general health (ASA grade ≥ 3), and use of Exeter or Lubinus prosthesis were not linked to the appearance of FPFs. Conclusion This meta-analysis suggested that female gender, rheumatoid arthritis, and revision arthroplasty are major risk factors for the development of FPFs after a HA. In those patients, frequent follow-ups should be planned. Further prospective studies are necessary to clarify all the risk factors contributing to the appearance of FPFs after HA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document