scholarly journals Feasibility, effectiveness and safety of the self-management intervention deprexis in routine medical care: Results of an uncontrolled observational study

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 100341
Author(s):  
Jan Philipp Klein ◽  
Bettina Barthel ◽  
Thomas Berger ◽  
Steffen Moritz
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Management Intervention ◽  
Routine Medical Care

scholarly journals 2294 Do patient comorbidities impact the effectiveness of a COPD self-management program?

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (S1) ◽  
pp. 41-41
Author(s):  
Emilia Galli Thurber ◽  
Hanan Aboumatar
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
The United States ◽  
Management Program ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Management Intervention ◽  
Comorbidity Burden

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of both hospitalizations and readmissions in the United States, and about 1 in 5 hospitalized patients with COPD will be readmitted within 30 days. COPD-focused self-management programs are frequently used to help patients better manage their symptoms and prevent hospitalization. However, while the majority of patients with COPD have at least one comorbidity, most trials of COPD self-management programs either excluded patients with significant comorbidities or did not analyze the impact of comorbidities on patient outcomes. Using data from the BREATHE trial of a COPD self-management program, this study aims to determine if patient post-intervention outcomes differ based on the intensity and type of patient comorbidities. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: In total, 240 patients hospitalized for COPD were randomly assigned to either a comprehensive self-management intervention or usual transitional care. Primary outcomes for this trial were the number of COPD-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits at 6 months and changes in COPD-specific quality of life. To determine whether patient comorbidities modify the effect of the self-management intervention on readmission and quality of life outcomes, we will compare patient outcomes across groups stratified by comorbidity burden (Charlson Comorbidity Index) and type (baseline diagnosis of congestive heart failure, diabetes, and depression). In addition, we will use regression analysis with interaction terms to test for interaction between comorbidity burden/type and intervention assignment. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We hypothesize that the effect of the self-management intervention will differ in patients with greater comorbidity burden due to competing medical demands for patients with multimorbidity. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The results of this study will help clinicians better target disease-specific self-management programs to the groups of patients with COPD who are likely to receive the greatest benefit from this type of intervention.

Web-Based Return of Individual Patient-Reported Outcome Results Among Patients With Lymphoma: A Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindy Paulina Johanna Arts ◽  
Simone Oerlemans ◽  
Jacobien M Kieffer ◽  
Judith Prins ◽  
Mels Hoogendoorn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Management Intervention ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

BACKGROUND There has been a cultural shift toward patient engagement in health with a growing demand from patients to access their results. OBJECTIVE The Lymphoma InterVEntion [LIVE] trial was conducted to examine the impact of return of individual patient-reported outcome (PRO) results and a web-based self-management intervention on psychological distress, self-management, and satisfaction with information in a population-based setting. METHODS Return of PRO results included comparison with age- and sex-matched peers and was built into the PROFILES registry. The self-management intervention is an adaptation of an fully-automated evidence-based intervention for breast cancer survivors. Patients with lymphoma who completed the web-based questionnaire were equally randomized to 1) care as usual (CAU), 2) return of PRO results, and 3) return of PRO results plus self-management intervention. Patients completed questionnaires 9 to 18 months after diagnosis (T0; n=227), after 4 months (T1; n=190), and after 12 months (T2; n=170). RESULTS Of all invited patients, 25% (227/892) were randomly assigned to CAU (n=76), return of PRO results (n=74), or return of PRO results and access to Living with lymphoma (n=77). Return of PRO results was viewed by 77% (115/150) of those with access. No significant differences were observed for psychological distress, self-management, satisfaction with information provision, and healthcare use between patients who received their PRO results and those who did not (P>.05). Usage of the self-management intervention was low (3%; 2/76) and an effect could therefore not be determined. CONCLUSIONS Return of individual PRO results seems to meet patients’ wishes, but had no beneficial effects on patient outcome. Also, no negative effects were found when individual PRO results were disclosed, and the return of individual PRO results can be safely implemented in daily clinical practice. CLINICALTRIAL Netherlands Trial Register NTR5953 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-10.1186/s13063-017-1943-2

scholarly journals Pace and determinants of implementation of the self-management of well-being group intervention: a multilevel observational study

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daphne Kuiper ◽  
Nardi Steverink ◽  
Roy E. Stewart ◽  
Sijmen A. Reijneveld ◽  
Robbert Sanderman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Group Intervention ◽  
Well Being ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Determinants Of Implementation

scholarly journals A self-management programme for COPD: a randomised controlled trial

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 1538-1547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katy E. Mitchell ◽  
Vicki Johnson-Warrington ◽  
Lindsay D. Apps ◽  
John Bankart ◽  
Louise Sewell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Exercise Performance ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Management Programme ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Disease Knowledge ◽  
Management Intervention ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Studies of programmes of self-management support for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been inconclusive. The Self-Management Programme of Activity, Coping and Education (SPACE) FOR COPD is a 6-week self-management intervention for COPD, and this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of this intervention in primary care.A single-blind randomised controlled trial recruited people with COPD from primary care and randomised participants to receive usual care or SPACE FOR COPD. Outcome measures were performed at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months. The primary outcome was symptom burden, measured by the self-reported Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ-SR) dyspnoea domain. Secondary outcomes included other domains of the CRQ-SR, shuttle walking tests, disease knowledge, anxiety, depression, self-efficacy, smoking status and healthcare utilisation.184 people with COPD were recruited and randomised. At 6 weeks, there were significant differences between groups in CRQ-SR dyspnoea, fatigue and emotion scores, exercise performance, anxiety, and disease knowledge. At 6 months, there was no between-group difference in change in CRQ-SR dyspnoea. Exercise performance, anxiety and smoking status were significantly different between groups at 6 months, in favour of the intervention.This brief self-management intervention did not improve dyspnoea over and above usual care at 6 months; however, there were gains in anxiety, exercise performance, and disease knowledge.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document