scholarly journals Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder and Chronic Irritability in Youth at Familial Risk for Bipolar Disorder

Author(s):  
Garrett M. Sparks ◽  
David A. Axelson ◽  
Haifeng Yu ◽  
Wonho Ha ◽  
Javier Ballester ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (12) ◽  
pp. 1220-1226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tania Perich ◽  
Andrew Frankland ◽  
Gloria Roberts ◽  
Florence Levy ◽  
Rhoshel Lenroot ◽  
...  

Objective: Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder is a newly proposed childhood disorder included in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition to describe children ⩽18 years of age with chronic irritability/temper outbursts. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, severe mood dysregulation and chronic irritability in an Australian study of young people at increased familial risk of developing bipolar disorder (‘HR’ group) and controls (‘CON’ group). Methods: A total of 242 12- to 30-year-old HR or CON subjects were administered the severe mood dysregulation module. Of these, 42 were aged ⩽18 years at the time of assessment, with 29 subjects in the HR group and 13 in the CON group. Results: No subjects ⩽18 years – in either group – fulfilled current or lifetime criteria for disruptive mood dysregulation disorder or severe mood dysregulation, the precursor to disruptive mood dysregulation disorder. Similarly, no subjects in either group endorsed the severe mood dysregulation/disruptive mood dysregulation disorder criteria for irritable mood or marked excessive reactivity. One HR participant endorsed three severe mood dysregulation criteria (distractibility, physical restlessness and intrusiveness), while none of the comparison subjects endorsed any criteria. Exploratory studies of the broader 12- to 30-year-old sample similarly found no subjects with severe mood dysregulation/disruptive mood dysregulation disorder in either the HR or CON group and no increased rates of chronic irritability, although significantly more HR subjects reported at least one severe mood dysregulation/disruptive mood dysregulation disorder criterion (likelihood ratio = 6.17; p = 0.013); most of the reported criteria were severe mood dysregulation ‘chronic hyper-arousal’ symptoms. Conclusion: This study comprises one of the few non-US reports on the prevalence of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder and severe mood dysregulation and is the first non-US study of the prevalence of these conditions in a high-risk bipolar disorder sample. The failure to replicate the finding of higher rates of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder and chronic irritability in high-risk offspring suggests that these are not robust precursors of bipolar disorder.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel H.B. Mitchell ◽  
Vanessa Timmins ◽  
Jordan Collins ◽  
Antonette Scavone ◽  
Adam Iskric ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 154-157
Author(s):  
Waleed A. Alghamdi

Background: In 2013, Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder (DMDD) was introduced in the DSM-5 in part to curb the rapid rise in the rates of bipolar diagnosis among children and adolescents during the decade before the DSM-5 publication. DMDD proved to be a controversial diagnosis for many reasons. Objective: This brief review aims to provide an overview of the DMDD diagnosis and its origins and summarize available data on the impact of the introduction of the DMDD diagnosis on the rates of bipolar disorder among children and adolescents. Methods: Multiple scientific databases were searched using the related terms “DMDD”, “Disruptive Mood Dysregulation”, and “pediatric bipolar disorder” in combination with the terms “diagnosis” and “impact”. The retrieved articles were reviewed carefully. Results: The DMDD diagnosis rates have steadily increased since its introduction. Furthermore, available data show a decrease in the rates of bipolar disorder diagnosis among children and adolescents over the past few years. Conclusion: The very limited available data since 2013 show a decline in the diagnosis of bipolar disorder among children and adolescents. More time and further research are needed to more accurately determine the impact of the DMDD diagnosis on the rates of bipolar disorder in this population.


2017 ◽  
Vol 210 (6) ◽  
pp. 408-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas Propper ◽  
Jill Cumby ◽  
Victoria C. Patterson ◽  
Vladislav Drobinin ◽  
Jacqueline M. Glover ◽  
...  

BackgroundIt has been suggested that offspring of parents with bipolar disorder are at increased risk for disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD), but the specificity of this association has not been established.AimsWe examined the specificity of DMDD to family history by comparing offspring of parents with (a) bipolar disorder, (b) major depressive disorder and (c) a control group with no mood disorders.MethodWe established lifetime diagnosis of DMDD using the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Aged Children for DSM-5 in 180 youth aged 6–18 years, including 58 offspring of parents with bipolar disorder, 82 offspring of parents with major depressive disorder and 40 control offspring.ResultsDiagnostic criteria for DMDD were met in none of the offspring of parents with bipolar disorder, 6 of the offspring of parents with major depressive disorder and none of the control offspring. DMDD diagnosis was significantly associated with family history of major depressive disorder.ConclusionsOur results suggest that DMDD is not specifically associated with a family history of bipolar disorder and may be associated with parental depression.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary A. Fristad ◽  
Hannah Wolfson ◽  
Guillermo Perez Algorta ◽  
Eric A. Youngstrom ◽  
L. Eugene Arnold ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document