Background. Ultrasonically activated dissectors (UADs) and radiofrequency-based devices have been considered excellent surgical devices because of their reliability and flexibility. Meanwhile, microwave-based devices have demonstrated potential with their unique heating mechanism. This study aims to compare the sealing function of a newly invented forceps-like microwave sealer (MS) with that of currently available UADs. Materials and Methods. MS and 2 examples of UADs (Harmonic Focus+ [HF+] and Sonicision [SNC]) were employed to perform mesenterectomies (in vivo) and sealing sizable vessels (ex vivo). Vessel diameter, seal time, burst pressure (BP), sealing completion, and instrument sticking were recorded. The samples underwent histological investigation for thermal damage evaluation. Results. During mesenterectomies, MS required 3 seconds and 30 W to secure a complete seal. The BP achieved by the MS seal was higher than that of HF+ and SNC on arteries (851 ± 203.7 vs 682.4 ± 287.3, P < .05; vs 833.1 ± 251.2 mmHg, P = .4523, respectively) but was not statistically different on veins (324.9 ± 203.5 vs 460.1 ± 320.3 vs 508.3 ± 350.7 mmHg, P = .215). In all trials, MS caused less sticking but exhibited similar heat-induced alterations to UADs. MS’s thermal spread was not statistically more extended than that of UADs on either arteries or veins. Conclusions. MS was capable of not only sealing tiny vessels but also achieving high-pressure endurance on sizable vessels. Its forceful grasping and synchronous heating process helped create solid stumps with an acceptable thermal spread.
Assessment of laser-induced thermal damage in fresh skin with ex vivo confocal microscopy