P2-247: EEG THETA OSCILLATIONS AS A POTENTIAL BIOMARKER FOR EXECUTIVE DYSFUNCTION IN NEURODEGENERATIVE DISORDERS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS

2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (7S_Part_14) ◽  
pp. P768-P768
Author(s):  
Lenka J. Wichmann ◽  
Juan Francisco Flores-Vazquez ◽  
Mengxi Huang ◽  
Ana Luisa Sosa-Ortíz ◽  
André Aleman ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
William M. Jackson ◽  
Nicholas Davis ◽  
Johanna Calderon ◽  
Jennifer J. Lee ◽  
Nicole Feirsen ◽  
...  

Abstract Context: People with CHD are at increased risk for executive functioning deficits. Meta-analyses of these measures in CHD patients compared to healthy controls have not been reported. Objective: To examine differences in executive functions in individuals with CHD compared to healthy controls. Data sources: We performed a systematic review of publications from 1 January, 1986 to 15 June, 2020 indexed in PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Study selection: Inclusion criteria were (1) studies containing at least one executive function measure; (2) participants were over the age of three. Data extraction: Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two authors. We used a shifting unit-of-analysis approach and pooled data using a random effects model. Results: The search yielded 61,217 results. Twenty-eight studies met criteria. A total of 7789 people with CHD were compared with 8187 healthy controls. We found the following standardised mean differences: −0.628 (−0.726, −0.531) for cognitive flexibility and set shifting, −0.469 (−0.606, −0.333) for inhibition, −0.369 (−0.466, −0.273) for working memory, −0.334 (−0.546, −0.121) for planning/problem solving, −0.361 (−0.576, −0.147) for summary measures, and −0.444 (−0.614, −0.274) for reporter-based measures (p < 0.001). Limitations: Our analysis consisted of cross-sectional and observational studies. We could not quantify the effect of collinearity. Conclusions: Individuals with CHD appear to have at least moderate deficits in executive functions. Given the growing population of people with CHD, more attention should be devoted to identifying executive dysfunction in this vulnerable group.


2019 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 518-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yurong Wang ◽  
Guijuan Zhang ◽  
Xiaoqian Hao ◽  
Yi Ma ◽  
Min Ma ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 639-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huang Huang ◽  
Yan Shi ◽  
Jietao Huang ◽  
Xiaohui Wang ◽  
Rui Zhang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuchu Shao ◽  
Fengming Yang ◽  
Zhiqiang Qin ◽  
Xinming Jing ◽  
Yongqian Shu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Recently, a growing number of studies have reported the coorelation between miR-155 and the diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancer, but results of these researches were still controversial due to insufficient sample size. Thus, we carried out the systematic review and meta-analysis to figure out whether miR-155 could be a screening tool in the detection and prognosis of lung cancer. Methods: A meta-analysis of 13 articles with 19 studies was performed by retrieving the PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. We screened all correlated literaters until December 1st, 2018. For the diagnosis analysis of miR-155 in lung cancer, sensitivity(SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were pooled to evaluate the accuracy of miRNA-155 in the diagnosis of lung cancer. For the prognosis analysis of miR-155 in lung cancer, the pooled HRs and 95% CIs of miR-155 for overall survival/disease free survival/progression-free survival (OS/DFS/PFS) were calculated. In addition, Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to distinguish the potential sources of heterogeneity between studies. Results: For the diagnostic analysis of miR-155 in lung cancer, the pooled SEN and SPE were 0.82 (95% CI: 0.72-0.88) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71-0.84), respectively. Besides, the pooled PLR was 3.75 (95% CI: 2.76-5.10), NLR was 0.23 (95% CI: 0.15-0.37), DOR was 15.99 (95% CI: 8.11-31.52) and AUC was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84-0.90), indicating a significant value of miR-155 in the lung cancer detection. For the prognostic analysis of miR-155 in lung cancer, up-regulated miRNA-155 expression was not significantly associated with a poor OS (pooled HR = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.66-2.40) or DFS/PFS (pooled HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.82-1.97). Conclusions: The present meta-analysis demonstrated that miR-155 could be a potential biomarker for the detection of lung cancer but not an effective biomarker for predicting the outcomes of lung cancer. Furthermore, more well-designed researches with larger cohorts were warranted to confirm the value of miR-155 for the diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancer.


2019 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. 238.e25-238.e34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chrysoula Marogianni ◽  
Dimitrios Rikos ◽  
Antonios Provatas ◽  
Katerina Dadouli ◽  
Panagiotis Ntellas ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e88745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Yang ◽  
Zongyue Zeng ◽  
Yixuan Hou ◽  
Taixian Yuan ◽  
Chao Gao ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 409-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang Tong ◽  
Dongguang Wang ◽  
Sitong Liu ◽  
Yao Ma ◽  
Zhenzhen Li ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document