Consumption of Dietary Guidelines for Americans types and amounts of vegetables increases mean Subjective Happiness Scale scores: A randomized controlled trial

Author(s):  
Angela De Leon ◽  
Lisa Jahns ◽  
James N. Roemmich ◽  
Sara E. Duke ◽  
Shanon L. Casperson
2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 516-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
JaYoung Kim ◽  
Dae Yul Kim ◽  
Min Ho Chun ◽  
Seong Woo Kim ◽  
Ha Ra Jeon ◽  
...  

Objective: To investigate the effects of Morning Walk®–assisted gait training for patients with stroke. Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial. Setting: Three hospital rehabilitation departments (two tertiary and one secondary). Patients: We enrolled 58 patients with hemiparesis following a first-time stroke within the preceding year and with Functional Ambulation Category scores ⩾2. Intervention: The patients were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: 30 minutes of training with Morning Walk®, a lower limb rehabilitation robot, plus 1 hour of conventional physiotherapy (Morning Walk® group; n = 28); or 1.5 hour of conventional physiotherapy (control group; n = 30). All received treatment five times per week for three weeks. Main outcome measurements: The primary outcomes were walking ability, assessed using the Functional Ambulation Category scale, and lower limb function, assessed using the Motricity Index-Lower. Secondary outcomes included the 10 Meter Walk Test, Modified Barthel Index, Rivermead Mobility Index, and Berg Balance Scale scores. Results: A total of 10 patients were lost to follow-up, leaving a cohort of 48 for the final analyses. After training, all outcome measures significantly improved in both groups. In Motricity Index-Lower of the affected limb, the Morning Walk® group (∆mean ± SD; 19.68 ± 14.06) showed greater improvement ( p = .034) than the control group (∆mean ± SD; 11.70 ± 10.65). And Berg Balance Scale scores improved more ( p = .047) in the Morning Walk® group (∆mean ± SD; 14.36 ± 9.01) than the control group (∆mean ± SD; 9.65 ± 8.14). Conclusion: Compared with conventional physiotherapy alone, our results suggest that voluntary strength and balance of stroke patients with hemiparesis might be improved with Morning Walk®–assisted gait training combined with conventional physiotherapy.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frans Folkvord ◽  
Gosse Haga ◽  
Alexandra Theben

BACKGROUND Currently, children’s dietary intake patterns do not meet prescribed dietary guidelines. Consequently, childhood obesity is one of the most serious health concerns. Therefore, innovative methods need to be developed and tested in order to effectively improve the dietary intake of children. Teaching children how to cope with the overwhelming number of unhealthy food cues could be conducted effectively by serious health games. OBJECTIVE The main aim of this study was to examine the effect of a serious health computer game on young children’s eating behavior and attitudes toward healthy and unhealthy foods. METHODS A cluster-randomized controlled trial with a between-group design was conducted (n=157; 8-12 years), wherein children played a game that promoted a healthy lifestyle or attended regular classes and did not play a game (control). The game was designed in collaboration with researchers and pilot-tested among a group of children repeatedly before conducting the experiment. After 1 week of playing, attitudes toward food snacks and actual intake (children could eat <i>ad libitum</i> from fruits or energy-dense snacks) was assessed. RESULTS The results showed that playing a serious health game did not have an effect on attitude toward fruits or energy-dense snacks or on the intake of fruits or less energy-dense snacks. Additional Bayesian analyses supported these findings. CONCLUSIONS Serious health games are increasingly considered to be a potential effective intervention when it comes to behavior change. The results of the current study stress the importance of tailoring serious health games in order to be effective, because no effect was found on attitude or eating behavior. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05025995; https://tinyurl.com/mdd7wrjd


2009 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 409-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen-Yi Song ◽  
Yeong-Fwu Lin ◽  
Tung-Ching Wei ◽  
Da-Hon Lin ◽  
Tzu-Yu Yen ◽  
...  

BackgroundA common treatment for patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is strength (force-generating capacity) training of the vastus medialis oblique muscle (VMO). Hip adduction in conjunction with knee extension is commonly used in clinical practice; however, evidence supporting the efficacy of this exercise is lacking.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to determine the surplus effect of hip adduction on the VMO.DesignThis study was a randomized controlled trial.SettingThe study was conducted in a kinesiology laboratory.ParticipantsEighty-nine patients with PFPS participated.InterventionParticipants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: hip adduction combined with leg-press exercise (LPHA group), leg-press exercise only (LP group), or no exercise (control group). Training consisted of 3 weekly sessions for 8 weeks.MeasurementsRatings of worst pain as measured with a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS-W), Lysholm scale scores, and measurements of VMO morphology (including cross-sectional area [CSA] and volume) were obtained before and after the intervention.ResultsSignificant improvements in VAS-W ratings, Lysholm scale scores, and VMO CSA and volume were observed after the intervention in both exercise groups, but not in the control group. Significantly greater improvements for VAS-W ratings, Lysholm scale scores, and VMO volume were apparent in the LP group compared with the control group. There were no differences between the LP and LPHA groups for any measures.LimitationsOnly the VMO was examined by ultrasonography. The resistance level for hip adduction and the length of intervention period may have been inadequate to induce a training effect.ConclusionsSimilar changes in pain reduction, functional improvement, and VMO hypertrophy were observed in both exercise groups. Incorporating hip adduction with leg-press exercise had no impact on outcome in patients with PFPS.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Chan Kim ◽  
Jihee Kim ◽  
Hayeon Kwak ◽  
So Woon Ahn

Abstract Background: Nasal bone fracture is the most common type of facial fracture, and the high incidence of severe emergence agitation occurring after closed reduction of the nasal bone fracture can be challenging to manage. The purpose of this trial was to evaluate whether pre-operative administration of dexmedetomidine is effective in reducing the incidence and severity of emergence agitation in adults undergoing closed reduction of nasal bone fractures. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 90 patients who were scheduled to undergo closed reduction of a nasal bone fracture were prospectively included and were randomly assigned to either the control group (n = 45; 0.9% saline infusion) or the dexmedetomidine group (n = 45; 1 μ/kg over 10 min, pre-operatively). The primary endpoint was Aono's four-point scale scores after anesthesia. The recovery time and numeric rating scale score were assessed as secondary endpoints. Results: Aono's four-point scale scores were lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the control group (median: 1 [1-1] vs. 1 [1-2], 95% confidence interval of difference: 0.01 to 0.02, P = 0.02). The number, severity, and duration of agitation episodes were significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the control group. Furthermore, the number of patients exhibiting intraoperative movement was lower in the dexmedetomidine group. Conclusions: Pre-operative administration of dexmedetomidine demonstrated several significant benefits, such as a lower incidence of emergence agitation, reduced agitation severity, and a shorter duration of agitation. Additionally, we observed more stable maintenance of intraoperative anesthesia with less movement during the surgery.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 1266-1266
Author(s):  
Angela De Leon ◽  
Lisa Jahns ◽  
James Roemmich ◽  
Shanon Casperson

Abstract Objectives The health benefits of diets rich in fruits and vegetables (FV) are well established and form the basis of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA). Furthermore, FV consumption may also exert a positive effect on psychological well-being. This study aimed to assess changes in global subjective happiness when consuming DGA recommended types and amounts of vegetables. It was hypothesized that increased vegetable consumption would increase happiness. Methods This study investigated secondary outcomes of a randomized, parallel, non-blinded controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio to a provided vegetable intervention or attention control group. Men and women aged 18–65 yr, body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m,2 with low habitual vegetable consumption (&lt;1 serving/day) were recruited for this community-based study. The vegetable intervention consisted of an 8-week feeding phase during which participants were provided with vegetables in DGA recommended types and amounts. The attention control group was not provided vegetables but completed the same testing schedule as the vegetable intervention group. The Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS) was used to assess individual perceived happiness before and after the intervention. SHS scores were analyzed using a mixed model analysis of variance both with and without baseline SHS scores as a covariate. Results A significant interaction between treatment and visit (P = 0.005) revealed greater happiness at week 8 than at baseline in the vegetable intervention group but no change in the attention control group. When adjusted for baseline scores, a significant effect of treatment (P = 0.005) was found with greater happiness scores in the vegetable intervention group compared to the attention control group post intervention (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusions Greater subjective happiness was observed after increasing vegetable consumption to meet DGA recommendations. Funding Sources USDA-ARS #5450–51,530-057–00D.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Chan Kim ◽  
Jihee Kim ◽  
Hayeon Kwak ◽  
So Woon Ahn

Abstract Background: Nasal bone fracture is the most common type of facial fracture, and the high incidence of severe emergence agitation occurring after closed reduction of the nasal bone fracture can be challenging to manage. The purpose of this trial was to evaluate whether pre-operative administration of dexmedetomidine is effective in reducing the incidence and severity of emergence agitation in adults undergoing closed reduction of nasal bone fractures. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 90 patients who were scheduled to undergo closed reduction of a nasal bone fracture were prospectively included and were randomly assigned to either the control group (n = 45; 0.9% saline infusion) or the dexmedetomidine group (n = 45; 1 μ/kg over 10 min, pre-operatively). The primary endpoint was Aono's four-point scale scores after anesthesia. The recovery time and numeric rating scale score were assessed as secondary endpoints. Results: Aono's four-point scale scores were lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the control group (median: 1 [1-1] vs. 1 [1-2], 95% confidence interval of difference: 0.01 to 0.02, P = 0.02). The number, severity, and duration of agitation episodes were significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the control group. Furthermore, the number of patients exhibiting intraoperative movement was lower in the dexmedetomidine group. Conclusions: Pre-operative administration of dexmedetomidine demonstrated several significant benefits, such as a lower incidence of emergence agitation, reduced agitation severity, and a shorter duration of agitation. Additionally, we observed more stable maintenance of intraoperative anesthesia with less movement during the surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document