A real world dissemination and implementation of Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy (TBT) for veterans with affective disorders

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 72-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel F. Gros ◽  
Derek D. Szafranski ◽  
Sarah D. Shead
Author(s):  
Elizabeth M Venditti ◽  
Lesley E Steinman ◽  
Megan A Lewis ◽  
Bryan J Weiner ◽  
Jun Ma

Abstract More than one third of adults in the United States (U.S.) live with multiple chronic conditions that affect their physical and mental health, functional outcomes, independence, and mortality. The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed not only an increased risk for infection, morbidity, and mortality among those with chronic conditions but long-standing health inequities by age, race, sex, and other social determinants. Obesity plus depression represent one such prevalent comorbidity for which few effective integrated interventions exist, prompting concern about the potential for secondary physical and mental health pandemics post COVID-19. Translational behavioral medicine research can play an important role in studying integrated collaborative healthcare approaches and advancing scientific understanding on how to engage and more effectively treat diverse populations with physical and mental health comorbidities. The RAINBOW (Research Aimed at Improving Both Mood and Weight) clinical trial experience offers a wealth of insights into the potential of collaborative care interventions to advance behavior therapy research and practice. Primary care patients with co-occurring obesity and depression were assigned to either Integrated Coaching for Mood and Weight (I-CARE), which blended Group Lifestyle Balance (GLB) for weight management and the Program to Encourage Active Rewarding Lives (PEARLS) for depression, or usual care, to examine clinical, cost-effectiveness, and implementation outcomes. This commentary highlights the empirical findings of eight RAINBOW research papers and discusses implications for future studies, including their relevance in the U.S. COVID-19 context. Organized by key principles of translational behavioral medicine research, the commentary aims to examine and embrace the heterogeneity of baseline and intervention response differences among those living with multiple chronic conditions. We conclude that to prevent health and healthcare disparities from widening further, tailored engagement, dissemination, and implementation strategies and flexible delivery formats are essential to improve treatment access and outcomes among underrepresented populations.


2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 68-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Kasari

An uptick in the number of rigorous tests of different interventions conducted in real-world settings with outcomes focused on core deficits bodes well for wide dissemination and implementation by nonspecialists in the community. Pilot and un¬controlled data on prevention and mechanism await further rigorous testing before conclusions can be drawn.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacy Farr ◽  
Carole J Decker ◽  
Anne Sales ◽  
John Spertus

Research Objective: Translating evidence into practice and communities is a complex process that often takes years. The shifting healthcare landscape from volume- to value-based demands learning health systems shift to more rapid uptake of evidence. The field of dissemination and implementation (D&I) science seeks to inform how evidence-based interventions can be successfully adopted, implemented and maintained in health care delivery and community settings. A significant challenge in implementing evidence into practice is finding researchers and the health workforce trained and equipped with the skills to do so in real world settings. This challenge is compounded by the fact that there are limited and highly competitive opportunities for training in D&I. Thus, a curriculum and certificate program, Training in Implementation: Actionable Research Approaches (TIARA) was developed and implemented to provide researchers and providers with skills in D&I. Study Design: Two projects are being implemented regionally across multiple hospitals. Prior to the projects' implementation, TIARA was launched. TIARA consists of four components: 1) completing four training module sessions by a national leader; 2) a pre- and post-knowledge assessment, 3) participation at four community forums on healthcare topics, and 4) compiling a Project Summary assignment. Population Studied: Study participants came from 14 regional hospitals, 4 healthcare payer organizations, 2 state hospital associations, 4 state and local public health departments, and 9 community based organizations, and 3 regional academic institutions. Over 120 individuals participated in the four TIARA training modules. Principal Findings: In late 2019, 16 individuals completed the requirements for, and received, TIARA Certificates. Over 60 percent of participants said their level of D&I expertise increased after taking part in the training. Across all eight competencies in implementation science, participants increased an average of 4 points on a 1-10 point Likert scale. Evaluations of TIARA demonstrated high levels of satisfaction with the program, relevance, and helpfulness of the program for their profession (average of 4.2 on a 1-5 Likert scale). Participants also showed high levels of satisfaction with the content of each of the sessions and frequency of communication (average of 4.6 on 1-5 Likert scale). The TIARA Certificate program contributed to 6 grant submissions, 4 real-world implementation projects, and 4 publications and/or presentations. Conclusions: There is a significant unmet need to expand skills, through both theoretical and practical training, to multiple organizations to reach a broader workforce of researchers, providers, and administrators. TIARA is one promising program to train, support, and encourage these stakeholders.


SAGE Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 215824401667921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy L. Winterbauer ◽  
Betty Bekemeier ◽  
Lisa VanRaemdonck ◽  
Anna G. Hoover

With real-world relevance and translatability as important goals, applied methodological approaches have arisen along the participatory continuum that value context and empower stakeholders to partner actively with academics throughout the research process. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) provides the gold standard for equitable, partnered research in traditional communities. Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) also have developed, coalescing communities of practice and of academics to identify, study, and answer practice-relevant questions. To optimize PBRN potential for expanding scientific knowledge, while bridging divides across knowledge production, dissemination, and implementation, we elucidate how PBRN partnerships can be strengthened by applying CBPR principles to build and maintain research collaboratives that empower practice partners. Examining the applicability of CBPR partnership principles to public health (PH) PBRNs, we conclude that PH-PBRNs can serve as authentic, sustainable CBPR partnerships, ensuring the co-production of new knowledge, while also improving and expanding the implementation and impact of research findings in real-world settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document