scholarly journals Local time variation of gravity wave momentum fluxes and their relationship with the tides derived from LIDAR measurements

2015 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 136-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Agner ◽  
Alan Z. Liu
2011 ◽  
Vol 73 (9) ◽  
pp. 911-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manja Placke ◽  
Peter Hoffmann ◽  
Erich Becker ◽  
Christoph Jacobi ◽  
Werner Singer ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 105-106 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Eswaraiah ◽  
M. Venkat Ratnam ◽  
B.V. Krishna Murthy ◽  
A. Guharay ◽  
S. Vijaya Bhaskara Rao

2014 ◽  
Vol 119 (24) ◽  
pp. 13,583-13,603 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Fritts ◽  
P.-Dominique Pautet ◽  
Katrina Bossert ◽  
Michael J. Taylor ◽  
Bifford P. Williams ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 889-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. F. Andrioli ◽  
D. C. Fritts ◽  
P. P. Batista ◽  
B. R. Clemesha

Abstract. The advantages of using a composite day analysis for all-sky interferometric meteor radars when measuring mean winds and tides are widely known. On the other hand, problems arise if this technique is applied to Hocking's (2005) gravity wave analysis for all-sky meteor radars. In this paper we describe how a simple change in the procedure makes it possible to use a composite day in Hocking's analysis. Also, we explain how a modified composite day can be constructed to test its ability to measure gravity wave momentum fluxes. Test results for specified mean, tidal, and gravity wave fields, including tidal amplitudes and gravity wave momentum fluxes varying strongly with altitude and/or time, suggest that the modified composite day allows characterization of monthly mean profiles of the gravity wave momentum fluxes, with good accuracy at least at the altitudes where the meteor counts are large (from 89 to 92.5 km). In the present work we also show that the variances measured with Hocking's method are often contaminated by the tidal fields and suggest a method of empirical correction derived from a simple simulation model. The results presented here greatly increase our confidence because they show that our technique is able to remove the tide-induced false variances from Hocking's analysis.


Radio Science ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Gopa Dutta ◽  
B. Bapiraju ◽  
P. V. Rao ◽  
A. I. Sheeba ◽  
M. C. Ajay Kumar ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 65 (10) ◽  
pp. 3042-3055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gillian Boccara ◽  
Albert Hertzog ◽  
Robert A. Vincent ◽  
François Vial

A methodology for estimating gravity wave characteristics from quasi-Lagrangian observations provided by long-duration, superpressure balloon flights in the stratosphere is reviewed. Wavelet analysis techniques are used to detect gravity wave packets in observations of pressure, temperature, and horizontal velocity. An emphasis is put on the estimation of gravity wave momentum fluxes and intrinsic phase speeds, which are generally poorly known on global scales in the atmosphere. The methodology is validated using Monte Carlo simulations of time series that mimic the balloon measurements, including the uncertainties associated with each of the meteorological parameters. While the azimuths of the wave propagation direction are accurately retrieved, the momentum fluxes are generally slightly underestimated, especially when wave packets overlap in the time–frequency domain, or for short-period waves. A proxy is derived to estimate by how much momentum fluxes are reduced by the analysis. Retrievals of intrinsic phase speeds are less accurate, especially for low phase speed waves. A companion paper (Part II) implements the methodology to observations gathered during the Vorcore campaign that took place in Antarctica between September 2005 and February 2006.


2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (17) ◽  
pp. 6383-6405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin A. Geller ◽  
M. Joan Alexander ◽  
Peter T. Love ◽  
Julio Bacmeister ◽  
Manfred Ern ◽  
...  

Abstract For the first time, a formal comparison is made between gravity wave momentum fluxes in models and those derived from observations. Although gravity waves occur over a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, the focus of this paper is on scales that are being parameterized in present climate models, sub-1000-km scales. Only observational methods that permit derivation of gravity wave momentum fluxes over large geographical areas are discussed, and these are from satellite temperature measurements, constant-density long-duration balloons, and high-vertical-resolution radiosonde data. The models discussed include two high-resolution models in which gravity waves are explicitly modeled, Kanto and the Community Atmosphere Model, version 5 (CAM5), and three climate models containing gravity wave parameterizations, MAECHAM5, Hadley Centre Global Environmental Model 3 (HadGEM3), and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) model. Measurements generally show similar flux magnitudes as in models, except that the fluxes derived from satellite measurements fall off more rapidly with height. This is likely due to limitations on the observable range of wavelengths, although other factors may contribute. When one accounts for this more rapid fall off, the geographical distribution of the fluxes from observations and models compare reasonably well, except for certain features that depend on the specification of the nonorographic gravity wave source functions in the climate models. For instance, both the observed fluxes and those in the high-resolution models are very small at summer high latitudes, but this is not the case for some of the climate models. This comparison between gravity wave fluxes from climate models, high-resolution models, and fluxes derived from observations indicates that such efforts offer a promising path toward improving specifications of gravity wave sources in climate models.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document