Interobserver Agreement Of On-site Ct Derived Ffr In Patients Undergoing Ct Angiography For Suspected Cad By Experience Level

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. S24
Author(s):  
S. Smolka ◽  
A. Fava ◽  
M. Marwan ◽  
S. Achenbach ◽  
M. Desai
Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinyi Leng ◽  
Robert Hurford ◽  
Xueyan Feng ◽  
Ka Lung Chan ◽  
Linxin Li ◽  
...  

Background: Despite numerous reports indicating ethnic difference in intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) between Caucasians and Asians, there has been no direct comparison in disease burden and clinical correlates of ICAS in stroke patients in the two populations with the same criteria to define ICAS. Methods: Acute minor stroke or transient ischemic attack patients who received cerebral MR/CT angiography exam in two cohorts were analyzed: Oxford Vascular Study (OXVASC, 2011-2018) with predominantly Caucasians, and the Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) stroke registry (2011-2015) with predominantly Chinese. ICAS was defined as ≥50% stenosis in any major intracranial artery in MR/CT angiography. Interobserver agreement between 2 investigators for presence of ICAS was assessed in 50 cases with Cohen’s kappa. We compared the burden and risk factors of ICAS in the two cohorts. Results: Overall, 1,287 patients from OXVASC (mean age 69 years) and 640 from the CUHK cohort (mean age 66 years) were analyzed. Interobserver agreement for presence of ICAS was good (kappa=0.82). Prevalence of ICAS was significantly higher in Chinese than in Caucasians: 43.6% in the CUHK cohort versus 20.0% in OXVASC (crude OR 3.10; age-adjusted OR 3.81, 95% CI 3.06-4.75; p<0.001). Mean ages of patients with ICAS in the two cohorts were 75 and 68 years, respectively. The difference between Caucasians and Chinese in ICAS prevalence was smaller in those aged ≥70 years (28.1% versus 51.9%) than those <70 years (9.8% versus 38.0%) (Figure). ICAS shared similar risk factors in the two cohorts, including older age, and history of hypertension and diabetes. Conclusions: Chinese are more susceptible to ICAS, with an earlier onset age than Caucasians, but the ICAS burden in Caucasians was higher than previously estimated, especially in older patients.


2006 ◽  
Vol 105 (5) ◽  
pp. 682-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene C. van der Schaaf ◽  
Birgitta K. Velthuis ◽  
Marieke J. H. Wermer ◽  
Nanne J. Frenkel ◽  
Charles B. L. M. Majoie ◽  
...  

Object Multislice computed tomography (CT) angiography may be useful for screening patients with intracranial aneurysms that are treated with clip occlusion. However, cobalt clips produce much more artifact on CT scans than titanium clips, which may hamper the evaluation of the image obtained at the clip site. Methods The authors screened 415 patients with previously ruptured aneurysms that had been treated using cobalt clips. Screening was performed using multislice CT angiography. The feasibility of this modality for screening these patients (based on the complication risk, CT angiography quality, and artifact avoidance) and interobserver agreement were evaluated. Patients in whom the presence of an aneurysm was suspected based on results of CT angiography studies underwent digital subtraction (DS) angiography. False-negative and false-positive findings were recorded, and the positive predictive value (PPV) was calculated. Eight patients (1.9%) had allergies to the contrast material. The quality of the CT angiography image was suboptimal in 14%. In 52%, clip artifacts hampered evaluation of the clip site. In 65 patients who underwent DS angiography, there were nine false-positive and eight false-negative reports related to aneurysms that were either small, located at the clip site, or were infundibula. The PPV on a per-patient basis was 86% (95% confidence interval [CI] 75–94%); for aneurysms at the clip site it was 83% (95% CI 61–95%); and for aneurysms at different locations it was 91% (95% CI 81–97%). The interobserver agreement was good (κ = 0.69; 95% CI 0.60–0.78). Conclusions Except for the evaluation of images from the clip site, CT angiography has good feasibility with good PPV and interobserver agreement. Drawbacks are that very small aneurysms can be missed and that visualization is poor at the clip site in patients in whom cobalt clips have been placed for occlusion. This second problem can be expected to resolve with the increasing use of titanium clips.


Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 234-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Finlayson ◽  
Verity John ◽  
Robert Yeung ◽  
Dar Dowlatshahi ◽  
Peter Howard ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 403-410
Author(s):  
J. B. Seo ◽  
J.-G. Im ◽  
J. M. Goo ◽  
M. J. Chung ◽  
W. K. Moon ◽  
...  

Purpose: To compare contrast-enhanced CT angiography (CTA) and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) for the detection of subsegmental-sized pulmonary emboli in a pig model. Material and Methods: In 5 anesthetized pigs, 3-mm diameter embolic materials made of Konjac, a semisolid food, were introduced through the internal jugular vein into pulmonary arteries. After embolization, CTA and MRA images were obtained. Respiration was suspended during CTA and MRA image acquisition. Two readers reviewed the CTA and MRA images to detect emboli. The pigs were sacrificed, and sliced specimens of inflated lung served as the gold standard. Results: Thirty-six emboli were detected within peripheral arteries. The sensitivity (and 95% confidence intervals) of CTA for the two readers were 57% (39–74%) and 66% (48–81%), and 88% (69–98%) and 92% (74–94%) for MRA. The specificity of CTA was 95% (91–97%) and 98% (96–99%), and that of MRA was 85% (74–93%) and 90% (80–96%). Interobserver agreement was higher for MRA (kappa 0.898) than CTA (kappa 0.574). Conclusion: For the detection of subsegmental pulmonary emboli, MRA was superior to CTA, with a higher sensitivity and interobserver agreement by demonstrating perfusion deficits.


2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 554-554
Author(s):  
Lori B. Schlunt ◽  
Jonathan D. Harper ◽  
Dale R. Broome ◽  
Greg Watkins ◽  
Pedro W. Baron ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
WILLIAM E. GOLDEN ◽  
ROBERT H. HOPKINS
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document