What drives the carbon emission in the Chinese cities?—A case of pilot low carbon city of Beijing

2018 ◽  
Vol 174 ◽  
pp. 343-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liyin Shen ◽  
Ya Wu ◽  
Yingli Lou ◽  
Deheng Zeng ◽  
Chenyang Shuai ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 675-677 ◽  
pp. 1750-1755
Author(s):  
Dong Wang ◽  
Hao Guo

Currently, as the economic development level of Shenzhen International Low-carbon City is relatively low and the industries are low-end, it belongs to the areas with high energy consumption, high pollution and low output. The construction path of the Low-carbon City mainly covers four aspects, namely low-carbon industries, green buildings, low-carbon transportation and low-carbon technology. The Low-carbon City can explore the path for realizing total carbon emission control through establishing regional carbon emission forecasting and monitoring system and carbon source and carbon sink accounting system.


Author(s):  
Zhanglan Wu ◽  
Jie Tang ◽  
Dong Wang

As the world’s second largest economy, China ranks amount the world’s top nations when it comes to carbon emission, and therefore its attitude towards climate change is closely followed by all parties concerned. There have been few researches on the role of environmental governance in low-carbon city transformation process, especially the Chinese one. This paper analyses the role of government environmental regulation played in the low-carbon city transformation process by taking Shenzhen as the research object. One of the world's youngest super cities, it also happens to be the lowest carbon emission intensity city in China. Striving to explore green low-carbon development path for the whole country, Shenzhen provides practical experience for countries to cope with global climate change. However, its efforts to reduce the total carbon emissions failed, but it emphasized the carbon emission intensity, which is consistent with the international commitments made by the central government. China’s policy towards handling climate change relies on hierarchical governance arrangement. The strength of the NGOs in the country is weak and incomparable with the government’s, which has mastered most of the resources and is just a reality in China.


Author(s):  
CHEN Nan ◽  
ZHUANG Guiyang ◽  
ZHU Shouxian ◽  
WANG Dong ◽  
LI Jue

This paper evaluates the low-carbon development of 176 Chinese cities in 2018 using the Low-carbon City Evaluation Indicator System developed by Research Institute for Eco-civilization, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. The evaluation shows an overall improvement of low-carbon development of cities in China, with 10 cities scoring 90 points and above, and 106 cities scoring 80–89 points. From the perspective of city category, the low-carbon development scores present an order as follows: service-oriented [Formula: see text]-prioritized [Formula: see text] cities. Geologically speaking, eastern cites perform best, western cities come second and central cities come last. Of the three batches of low-carbon city pilots, the scores follow the pattern of Batch [Formula: see text] 3. Most cities are characterized by high carbon consumption and reduced efforts in low-carbon management and capital investment. Finally, this paper proposes to attach more importance to low-carbon development and strengthen capacity building for low-carbon governance; intensify efforts for constructing low-carbon pilots in order to help achieve the goal of carbon emission peak during the “14th Five-Year Plan” period; and to improve the Low-carbon City Evaluation Indicator System.


2021 ◽  
Vol 241 ◽  
pp. 02003
Author(s):  
Jun Wang ◽  
Hua Zhao

With the further aggravation of global warming and the increasingly serious problems of ecological environment, the construction of low-carbon cities has become an inevitable choice for the global response to climate change and the sustainable development of economy and society. In order to understand the basic situation of China’s low-carbon cities more specifically, this paper selects countries with different urbanization rates to carry out benchmarking analysis with China, hoping to draw on the experience of other countries from the national level through multi-dimensional comparison, and guide the direction of China’s future urban development. Firstly, this paper selects the basic indicators such as the total amount of carbon dioxide emissions, per capita carbon emissions and carbon emissions per unit GDP of each country; Secondly, it compares the proportion of coal in energy and other indicators, and analyzes the energy structure of each country in depth; Thirdly, it compares the trend of carbon emissions in each country among 1990-2017. Finally, in order to reflect the carbon emission in the development of urbanization, this paper uses the “urbanization carbon emission index”, which is the ratio of per capita carbon emission and urbanization rate, to show the relationship between the degree of urbanization and carbon emission. Through benchmarking analysis, we can more clearly understand the overall trend of low-carbon city construction in different countries, recognize the gap between China and other countries, and better guide the development of low-carbon cities in China in the future.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (S2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiangyi Li ◽  
Mian Yang ◽  
Fei Xu ◽  
Fuxia Yang ◽  
Xiaojian Xiang

AbstractThe formulation and implementation of Low-Carbon City Policy (LCCP) is an essential initiative for China to build its low-carbon society. Based on the panel data of 282 prefecture-level cities in China from 2003 to 2016, this study evaluates the effects of LCCP implementation on pilot cities’ carbon emission performance using difference-in-differences method, and then the mechanism has also been examined with a mediating effect model. The results show that: first, the LCCP implementation has increased the carbon emission performance of the pilot cities significantly, indicating that it is an effective way to promote the low-carbon transformation of Chinese cities. Second, the positive effects in CO2 performance resulting from LCCP demonstrate significant heterogeneity: in general, the cities in east China, with higher economic development level and in a larger size, achieve more significant CO2 emission reduction than their respective counterparts. The results on the mechanism test imply that the LCCP helps improve pilot cities’ carbon emission performance in three ways, including reducing energy consumption, updating the industrial structure, and promoting technological progress. Finally, some useful policy recommendations are put forward to promote China’s low-carbon city construction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document