Nutrient management and cultivation techniques affect maize production through regulating greenhouse gas intensity and carbon budget under semi-arid climate

2020 ◽  
Vol 276 ◽  
pp. 124197
Author(s):  
Qianmin Jia ◽  
Jia Wang ◽  
Shahzad Ali ◽  
Shenghua Chang ◽  
Cheng Zhang ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (No. 10) ◽  
pp. 463-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeboah Stephen ◽  
Zhang Reanzhi ◽  
Cai Liqun ◽  
Jun Wu

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of biochar, straw and nitrogen (N) fertilizer on soil properties, crop yield and greenhouse gas intensity in rainfed spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and to produce background dataset to improve nutrient management guidelines for semiarid environments. The two carbon sources (straw and biochar) were applied alone or combined with nitrogen fertilizer (urea, 46% N), whilst the soil without carbon amendment was fertilized by urea in the rates 0, 50 and 100 kg N/ha. The experiments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. The greatest yields were found with 100 kg N/ha under biochar, straw and soils without carbon. Biochar treated soils produced the greatest grain yield at 1906 kg/ha, followed by straw at 1643 kg/ha, and soils without carbon at 1553 kg/ha. This was explained by increased easily oxidizable carbon and total soil nitrogen in the biochar treated soil (P &lt; 0.05). Straw treated soils and soils without carbon increased global warming potential by 13% and 14% compared to biochar amended soils. The biochar amended treatment also improved easily oxidizable carbon and total nitrogen (P &lt; 0.05), which supported the above results. BN<sub>100</sub> (15 t/ha biochar + 100 kg N/ha) reduced greenhouse gas intensity by approximately 30% compared to CN<sub>100</sub> (100 kg N/ha applied each year) and SN<sub>50</sub> (4.5 t/ha straw applied each year + 50 kg N/ha). Based on these results, biochar could be used with N-fertilizer as a soil conditioner to improve yield and reduced greenhouse gas intensity.


2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoye Gao ◽  
Aimin Lv ◽  
Shengyin Wang ◽  
Liantai Su ◽  
Peng Zhou ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiejun Zhang ◽  
yueling xi ◽  
Xiengchang Ma

Abstract Background and aims: Effective nutrients management under various farming techniques is critical for improving maize productivity and ensuring the long-term protection of water-saving agriculture under semi-arid regions. However, the impacts have not been well documented in determining the features of soil greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) emissions and the driving factors of nutrients fertilization is important for optimizing crop-land nutrients management under various farming techniques.Methods: The nutrients with farming techniques strategies were investigated under water-saving agriculture of maize during 2019-20 years, using the following nine treatments: BF: ridges covered with biodegradable film; CF: soil crust ridges; TF: conventional flat planting; 0: N:P at 0:0 kg ha-1, 1: N:P at 120:60 kg ha-1, 2: N:P at 280:140 kg ha-1. Results: Our results showed that the nutrients fertilization with various cultivation strategies had a significant influence on the GHG emissions. The BF2 treatment considerably increase soil water storage, soil respiration rate as a result of decreased ET rate and GHG emissions compared with the other treatments. The BF1 treatment significantly mitigated GWP, CH4, N2O, and CO2 emissions, changes in CH4, N2O, and CO2 cumulative emissions. The GHGI differently responded to nutrients with farming techniques strategies. Under the BF2 improved (25.0%) the average net GWP than that of TF2, but reduced GHGI, due to improved (18.5%) biomass productivity. The BF2 and BF1 farming methods results in greater N2O, CO2 emissions, GWP, and changes in cumulative CH4, N2O, and CO2 emissions, as a result, have an adverse effect on the soil than that of CF and TF treatments. Conclusions: However, obtained the higher area-scaled GWP (42.1%), WUEg (96.7%), WUEb (65.4%), and (41.1%) grain yield under the BF2 which may offset the negative environmental effects linked with climate change. Thus, it is recommended to use the BF2 treatment in water-saving agriculture under semi-arid regions for cleaner and more efficient maize production.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document