General strain theory, the criminal justice system and beyond: Introduction to the special issue

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 174-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Agnew ◽  
Matt DeLisi
2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 170-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Leeper Piquero ◽  
Miriam D. Sealock

A key criminological observation is the overrepresentation of minorities—especially African Americans—in the criminal justice system. Whether this difference is due to differential enforcement by the criminal justice system, differential participation by individuals, or some combination of these two perspectives is a source of much debate and controversy. Unfortunately, few theories have been developed and/or extended to understand race differences in crime. This article applies Agnew’s General Strain Theory (GST) as one potentially useful framework. Results indicate that GST variables operated as expected across the different models and that significant differences did emerge across racial groups. Theoretical implications and future research directions are highlighted.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (6-7) ◽  
pp. 527-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Preeti Chauhan ◽  
Jeremy Travis

To date, the enforcement of lower level offenses and the criminal justice system’s response to these enforcement actions has received little scholarly attention. To address this gap in scientific research, the Misdemeanor Justice Project (MJP) commissioned nine scholarly papers focused on criminal justice responses to lower level offenses. Each of the papers in this volume is guided by one of four overarching themes, including officer discretion; the impact of lower level enforcement on individuals, communities, and institutions; pretrial detention and diversion; and court processing and legal representation. As a collection, these papers serve as a launching pad for the development of a body of research in a critical and opaque area of our criminal justice system as well as highlight areas for future research.


2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 211-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward A. Polloway ◽  
James R. Patton ◽  
Tammy Smith ◽  
Julia Beyer ◽  
Jenevive W. Bailey

2016 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 90-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M. Snyder ◽  
Robin Hartinger-Saunders ◽  
Timothy Brezina ◽  
Elizabeth Beck ◽  
Eric R. Wright ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9
Author(s):  
Matthew W. Epperson ◽  
Amy Blank Wilson ◽  
Gina Fedock

This paper describes the concept of “Smart Decarceration” and introduces the special issue of Criminal Justice and Behavior entitled “Research to Advance Smart Decarceration Policies, Programs, and Interventions.” The concept of Smart Decarceration originated nearly a decade ago as the United States reached a tipping point in mass incarceration, and it focuses on three interrelated outcomes: substantially reducing the use of incarceration and other forms of punishment; reversing racial disparities and other inequities in the criminal justice system; and promoting safety and well-being, particularly for communities that have been most impacted by mass incarceration. Ultimately, Smart Decarceration efforts should prioritize reducing the overall footprint of the criminal justice system, while building capacity outside of the system to support safety, health, and well-being. Research plays a critical role in advancing Smart Decarceration, as new forms of knowledge and evidence must be developed to replace ineffective and unjust policies and practices associated with mass incarceration. The paper discusses approaches to research that move beyond typical criminal justice outcomes and focus on the multifaceted goals of Smart Decarceration. The six articles in this special issue are introduced, highlighting their foci across ecological levels and the breadth of the criminal justice continuum, centering populations most impacted by incarceration, and identifying practice and policy innovations.


2012 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theron Keith Jackson

Determining the accuracy and predictors of self-reported drug use is important for researchers who examine drug-related issues and for criminal justice professionals so that they are better able to provide proper treatment referrals for those in the criminal justice system. However, self-reports, especially those of drug users, are not always accurate. The present study examines general strain theory and its utility in explaining intentional inaccuracies of self-reported drug use. This study uses data from the 2003 Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring survey and the 2000 U.S. Census to examine self-reported drug use accuracy rates and predictors across four different drug types. Binomial conditional logistic regression models with fixed effects and robust standard errors are used. Findings show that experiencing strain may reduce the likelihood of accurately reporting drug use in a jail setting. The present study expands on recent literature on general strain theory to include purposeful deception as a possible deviant coping mechanism used in response to the strain an individual feels. Conclusions suggest that researchers might incorporate strain-related questions in surveys of potentially sensitive topics so as to better gauge the accuracy of self-reported information.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document