scholarly journals Endophthalmitis prophylaxis in cataract surgery: Overview of current practice patterns in 9 European countries

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 1421-1431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Behndig ◽  
Beatrice Cochener ◽  
José Luis Güell ◽  
Laurent Kodjikian ◽  
Rita Mencucci ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 565-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Behnding ◽  
Ravilla Ravindran ◽  
Harry Flynn ◽  
Nidhi Relhan ◽  
Julio Hernandez-Camarena ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 151 (3) ◽  
pp. 361-366
Author(s):  
Evan D. Bander ◽  
Jonathan H. Sherman ◽  
Chetan Bettegowda ◽  
Manish K. Aghi ◽  
Jason Sheehan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000464
Author(s):  
Tommaso Rossi ◽  
Mario R Romano ◽  
Danilo Iannetta ◽  
Vito Romano ◽  
Luca Gualdi ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo report the results of a global survey on cataract practice patterns related to preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative care, surgical setting and personnel allocation.Methods and analysisAn online 28 questions survey was sent to 240 ophthalmologists asking to describe prevailing trends in their institutions across 38 countries and 5 continents. Questions inquired country, institution, surgical volume and setting, anaesthesia, preoperative and intraoperative examination and postsurgical care. Statistical analysis used crosstabs lambda statistics for non-parametric nominal variables. P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results209/240 (87%) ophthalmologists responded: 38% representing public hospitals, 36% private practices and 26% academic sites; overall surgical volume was between 241 700 and 410 500 cataracts per year. There was a significant correlation between type of institution and surgical volume. Complete results available in online (https://freeonlinesurveys.com/r/W6BcLLxy).ConclusionCataract surgery related patterns of perioperative care showed significant difference among respondents, regardless to type of institution, surgical volume and country. Many evidence-based procedures are unevenly practiced around the world and some widespread and expensive habits lack solid scientific evidence while consuming enormous amount of resources both monetary and human. There is a need to reach consensus and share evidence-based practice patterns.


2015 ◽  
Vol 137 ◽  
pp. 150
Author(s):  
E.B. Pereira ◽  
B. De ◽  
V. Kolev ◽  
K. Zakashansky ◽  
S. Green ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 295 (3) ◽  
pp. 669-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lannah L. Lua ◽  
Yvette Hollette ◽  
Prathamesh Parm ◽  
Gayle Allenback ◽  
Vani Dandolu

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Walker ◽  
Meredith Spratford ◽  
Sophie E. Ambrose ◽  
Lenore Holte ◽  
Jacob Oleson

Purpose This study investigates clinical practice patterns and parent perception of intervention for children with mild hearing loss (HL). Method Ages at and delays between service delivery steps (first diagnostic evaluation, confirmation of HL, hearing aid [HA] fitting, entry into early intervention) were investigated for 113 children with mild HL. Comparisons were made to children with moderate-to-severe HL. Parents of children with mild HL reported reasons for delays and their perceptions of intervention and amplification for their children. Results Seventy-four percent of children with mild HL were identified through the newborn hearing screen; 26% were identified later due to passing or not receiving a newborn hearing screen. Ninety-four percent of children with mild HL were fit with HAs, albeit at significantly later ages than children with moderate-to-severe HL. Most parents indicated that their children benefited from HA use, but some parents expressed ambivalence toward the amount of benefit. Conclusions Audiologists appear to be moving toward regularly providing amplification for children with mild HL. However, delays in HA fittings indicate that further educating professionals and parents about the benefits of early amplification and intervention is warranted to encourage timely fitting and consistent use of HAs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document