Association Between Concurrent Use of Prescription Opioids and Benzodiazepines and Overdose: Retrospective Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 278-279
Author(s):  
John Michael Rague
BMJ ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. j760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric C Sun ◽  
Anjali Dixit ◽  
Keith Humphreys ◽  
Beth D Darnall ◽  
Laurence C Baker ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-148
Author(s):  
M. Mofizul Islam ◽  
Dennis Wollersheim

Objective: Concurrent use of opioids and benzodiazepines may cause a range of adverse health outcomes including fatal overdose. However, little is known about levels of concurrent use and its variation across jurisdictions. This study examined the population-level prevalence of concurrent use in Australia. Methods: We analyzed a 10% sample of unit record data of prescription opioids and benzodiazepines dispensed between January 2013 and December 2016. Using dispensing dates and days of supply in terms of defined daily dose (DDD), the concurrent users were identified as those for whom the supply in DDD quantity for one medicine overlapped with the supply day of the other. Multivariable and multilevel regression models were developed. Results: During the 4 years, almost a million (12.41% of 7.96 million) individuals were identified as concurrent users. Significantly more women were concurrent users than men across all age groups. On average, 1,750 per 100,000 people were concurrent users per year. There was substantial variation in the yearly average of concurrent users across jurisdictions, ranging from less than 1 to 5,400 per 100,000 people (standardized). Much of this variation was attributed to individual-level circumstances rather than structural factors. Conclusion: Concurrent use of opioid and benzodiazepine was common in Australia. There was considerable variation across jurisdictions in terms of the number of concurrent users. Women, older people, or those living in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas were dominant groups of concurrent users. Further research is needed to examine the precise reasons for concurrent use.


2013 ◽  
Vol 118 (6) ◽  
pp. 1183-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlon G. Saria ◽  
Courtney Corle ◽  
Jethro Hu ◽  
Jeremy D. Rudnick ◽  
Surasak Phuphanich ◽  
...  

Object The object of this study was to determine the tolerability and activity of lacosamide in patients with brain tumors. Methods The authors reviewed the medical records at 5 US academic medical centers with tertiary brain tumor programs, seeking all patients in whom a primary brain tumor had been diagnosed and who were taking lacosamide. Results The authors identified 70 patients with primary brain tumors and reviewed seizure frequency and toxicities. The majority of the patients had gliomas (96%). Fifty-five (78%) had partial seizures only, and 12 (17%) had generalized seizures. Most of the patients (74%) were started on lacosamide because of recurrent seizures. Forty-six patients (66%) reported a decrease in seizure frequency, and 21 patients (30%) reported stable seizures. Most of the patients (54 [77%]) placed on lacosamide did not report any toxicities. Conclusions This retrospective analysis demonstrated that lacosamide was both well tolerated and active as an add-on antiepileptic drug (AED) in patients with brain tumors. Lacosamide's novel mechanism of action will allow for concurrent use with other AEDs, as documented by its activity across many different types of AEDs used in this patient population. Larger prospective studies are warranted.


Author(s):  
Cheng Chen ◽  
Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic ◽  
Almut G. Winterstein ◽  
Patrick Tighe ◽  
Yu-Jung J. Wei

Author(s):  
Julie L. Wambaugh ◽  
Lydia Kallhoff ◽  
Christina Nessler

Purpose This study was designed to examine the association of dosage and effects of Sound Production Treatment (SPT) for acquired apraxia of speech. Method Treatment logs and probe data from 20 speakers with apraxia of speech and aphasia were submitted to a retrospective analysis. The number of treatment sessions and teaching episodes was examined relative to (a) change in articulation accuracy above baseline performance, (b) mastery of production, and (c) maintenance. The impact of practice schedule (SPT-Blocked vs. SPT-Random) was also examined. Results The average number of treatment sessions conducted prior to change was 5.4 for SPT-Blocked and 3.9 for SPT-Random. The mean number of teaching episodes preceding change was 334 for SPT-Blocked and 179 for SPT-Random. Mastery occurred within an average of 13.7 sessions (1,252 teaching episodes) and 12.4 sessions (1,082 teaching episodes) for SPT-Blocked and SPT-Random, respectively. Comparisons of dosage metric values across practice schedules did not reveal substantial differences. Significant negative correlations were found between follow-up probe performance and the dosage metrics. Conclusions Only a few treatment sessions were needed to achieve initial positive changes in articulation, with mastery occurring within 12–14 sessions for the majority of participants. Earlier occurrence of change or mastery was associated with better follow-up performance. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12592190


2016 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 145-146
Author(s):  
Tiffany Schwasinger-Schmidt ◽  
Georges Elhomsy ◽  
Fanglong Dong ◽  
Bobbie Paull-Forney

1994 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terence M. Murphy ◽  
Jessica M. Utts

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document