scholarly journals Impact of soy milk consumption on cardiometabolic risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 104499
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hassan Sohouli ◽  
Abolfazl Lari ◽  
Somaye Fatahi ◽  
Farzad Shidfar ◽  
Mihnea-Alexandru Găman ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 1741-1748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-fei Guo ◽  
Zi-hao Li ◽  
Huizhen Cai ◽  
Duo Li

The effects of Lycium barbarum L. (L. barbarum) on the cardiometabolic risk factors from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown inconsistent results.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 1659-1659
Author(s):  
Nema McGlynn ◽  
Tauseef Khan ◽  
Roselyn Zhang ◽  
Laura Chiavaroli ◽  
Fei Au-Yeung ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Concerns exist that NSBs do not have established benefits, with major dietary guidelines recommending that water and not NSBs replace sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs). Whether NSBs improve cardiometabolic risk factors similar to water in their intended substitution for SSBs is unclear. To inform the update of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) clinical practice guidelines for nutrition therapy, we conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess the effect of substituting NSBs for SSBs, water for SSBs and NSBs for water on cardiometabolic risk factors in people with and without diabetes. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library through March 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) ≥ 1 week comparing NSBs, SSBs, and/or water were included. Outcomes were measures of adiposity, glycemic control, lipids, blood pressure, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and uric acid. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed for the substitution of NSBs for SSBs, water for SSBs and NSBs for water. Data were expressed as mean (MD) or standardized mean (SMD) differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI). GRADE assessed certainty of evidence. Results We identified 14 RCTs (n = 1530) substituting NSBs for SSBs (7 trials, N = 483), NSBs for water (7 trials, n = 852) and water for SSBs (2 trials, n = 285) mostly in people at risk for or with diabetes. Substitution of NSBs for SSBs reduced body weight (MD, −1.11 kg [95% CI, −1.90 to –0.32]), BMI (−0.32 kg/m2 [−0.58 to –0.07]), body fat (−0.60% [−1.03 to –0.18]), triglycerides (−0.24 mmol/L [−0.45 to −0.02]), and liver fat (SMD, −0.44 [95% CI, −0.69 to –0.19]). Substitution of water for SSBs reduced only uric acid (–0.05 mmol/L [–0.08 to −0.01]). There was no effect of substituting NSBs for water on any outcome except HbA1c (0.21% [0.02 to 0.40]). The certainty of the evidence ranged from low to high. Conclusions The intended substitution of NSBs for SSBs improves cardiometabolic risk factors, showing similar benefits to water. The available evidence supports the use of NSBs as an alternative replacement strategy for SSBs. There is a need for more high-quality RCTs. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02879500) Funding Sources Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group of the EASD, CIHR, Diabetes Canada.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1076-1088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle A Lee-Bravatti ◽  
Jifan Wang ◽  
Esther E Avendano ◽  
Ligaya King ◽  
Elizabeth J Johnson ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Evidence suggests that eating nuts may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating almond consumption and risk factors for CVD. MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau, and previous systematic reviews were searched from 1990 through June 2017 for RCTs of ≥3 wk duration that evaluated almond compared with no almond consumption in adults who were either healthy or at risk for CVD. The most appropriate stratum was selected with an almond dose closer to 42.5 g, with a control most closely matched for macronutrient composition, energy intake, and similar intervention duration. The outcomes included risk factors for CVD. Random-effects model meta-analyses and subgroup meta-analyses were performed. Fifteen eligible trials analyzed a total of 534 subjects. Almond intervention significantly decreased total cholesterol (summary net change: −10.69 mg/dL; 95% CI: −16.75, −4.63 mg/dL), LDL cholesterol (summary net change: −5.83 mg/dL; 95% CI: −9.91, −1.75 mg/dL); body weight (summary net change: −1.39 kg; 95% CI: −2.49, −0.30 kg), HDL cholesterol (summary net change: −1.26 mg/dL; 95% CI: −2.47, −0.05 mg/dL), and apolipoprotein B (apoB) (summary net change: −6.67 mg/dL; 95% CI: −12.63, −0.72 mg/dL). Triglycerides, systolic blood pressure, apolipoprotein A1, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and lipoprotein (a) showed no difference between almond and control in the main and subgroup analyses. Fasting blood glucose, diastolic blood pressure, and body mass index significantly decreased with almond consumption of >42.5 g compared with ≤42.5 g. Almond consumption may reduce the risk of CVD by improving blood lipids and by decreasing body weight and apoB. Substantial heterogeneity in eligible studies regarding almond interventions and dosages precludes firmer conclusions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document