Management of older and frail patients with multiple myeloma in the Portuguese routine clinical practice: Deliberations and recommendations from an expert panel of hematologists

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1210-1216
Author(s):  
Cristina João ◽  
Catarina Geraldes ◽  
Manuel Neves ◽  
Mário Mariz ◽  
Fernanda Trigo
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Frail Patients

scholarly journals Analysis of the effectiveness of multiple myeloma treatment based on the clinical experience of European countries

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 404-414
Author(s):  
Vadim V. Ptushkin ◽  
Mario Mueller
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Daily Routine ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Indirect Indicator ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Aim. The main aim of this study was to model the effectiveness of multiple myeloma (MM) therapy using machine learning, which was based on the analysis of various methods of MM treatment, a number of prognostic factors and their results in the daily routine clinical practice of medical centers in European countries. Materials and methods. The present study was retrospective, non-interventional, multicenter. A structured database of MM patients provided by the Oncology Information service (O.I.s.) was used for the study. Registration took place in medical institutions in eight countries: Austria, Belgium, Switzerland, Germany, Spain, France, Greece and Great Britain. Results. In total, 57% of men and 43% of women were analyzed in the base of 6074 patients with MM. The median age was 71 years. The median follow-up time along the lines was 387 days. High-risk cytogenetics are represented in 15% of cases. The efficacy endpoint was the best response to each line of therapy, as measured by time to death (TTD) as an indirect indicator of overall survival and time to next treatment (TTNT) as an indirect indicator of progression-free survival. The median TTD and TTNT were 730 and 399 days respectively. After a multi-step selection process, characteristics with the greatest importance for the therapy prognosis were selected: age at the beginning of therapy, line of therapy, time after MM verification, ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group), cytogenetic risk, transplant eligibible or not, TTNT after the previous line of therapy, therapy regimen. Discussion. To continue the study it is necessary to analyze literature data and compare with real practice. Also analysis and comparison with Russian data on the treatment of patients with MM is required. Conclusion. The analysis of the presented data provides a basis for modeling a tool for assessing the effectiveness of MM therapy (prognosis of TTD and TTNT) for each patient, based on a number of prognostic factors and the results of routine clinical practice in various medical centers in European countries.

scholarly journals Four-Year Interim Analysis of Miroir, a French Multicenter, Non-Interventional Study of Pomalidomide in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1836-1836
Author(s):  
Olivier Decaux ◽  
Margaret Macro ◽  
Sophie Gourgou ◽  
Florence Lachenal ◽  
Caroline Bureau Lenoir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Interventional Study ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND Real-world data on the use of pomalidomide (POM) for the treatment (Tx) of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) are limited. The MIROIR study was designed to evaluate POM Tx in routine clinical practice in France. Here, we present results from a prespecified 4-year interim analysis. METHODS MIROIR is a multicenter, observational, ambispective, non-interventional study of POM in routine clinical practice. Adult patients (pts) with MM who initiated POM Tx in France between October 1, 2014, and September 30, 2018, were included. All pts were required to be enrolled in the French IMNOVID® registry. Data were collected from medical records of consenting pts. Key exclusion criteria included previous treatment with POM or simultaneous participation in a clinical trial. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months. Key secondary endpoints include time to next Tx (TTNT), overall survival (OS), and safety. This study is ongoing; targeted enrollment is 3000 pts (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02902900). RESULTS A total of 2099 pts were included in this analysis (median follow-up: 23.3 months; data cutoff: February 1, 2019). Median age was 70.0 years, and 655 pts (31.2%) were aged ≥ 75 years; 1134 pts (54.0%) were male. Median time from start of first-line Tx to POM initiation was 51.4 months. Pts had received a median of 3 prior lines of therapy (range: 0-9), with 914 (43.5%), 644 (30.7%), 312 (14.9%) and 229 pts (10.9%) receiving ≤ 2, 3, 4, and ≥ 5 prior lines, respectively. From 2014 to 2016, the median number of prior lines of therapy before POM initiation was 3, and from 2016 to 2018, the median was 2. Nearly all pts received prior lenalidomide (LEN; 97.0%) and bortezomib (96.7%). POM was initiated at 4 mg/day in 1635 pts (77.9%) overall and in 1216 pts (84.2%) aged < 75 years and in 419 pts (64.0%) aged ≥ 75 years. Dexamethasone was prescribed at 20 mg/day and 40 mg/day in 507 (35.1%) and 732 pts (50.7%) aged < 75 years and in 405 (61.8%) and 62 pts (9.5%) aged ≥ 75 years. Overall, the 6-month PFS rate was 51.7% (95% CI, 49.4%-54.1%). Other key PFS data in pt subgroups are reported in the Table. In the overall population, median TTNT, 12-month OS rate, and median OS were 10.4 months (95% CI, 9.7-11.2), 70.6% (95% CI, 68.5-72.6), and 24.6 months (95% CI, 22.9-not reached), respectively. Among 1164 pts (55.5%) with ≥ 1 adverse event (AE), the most common AEs were neutropenia (290 pts; 24.9%), infections (263 pts; 22.6%), thrombocytopenia (99 pts; 8.5%), and asthenia (87 pts; 7.5%). POM dose was reduced due to an AE in 20.7% of pts; POM Tx was interrupted or discontinued due to an AE in 36.2% and 15.2% of pts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The results of this interim analysis confirm the efficacy of POM reported in clinical trials and underscore its role in Tx of RRMM, including after LEN Tx. Median PFS in pts with ≤ 2 prior Tx lines was numerically longer than in pts who had more Tx lines, supporting earlier Tx with POM. PFS outcomes were similar regardless of the duration of LEN Tx (< or ≥ 6 months) before initiation of POM and whether pts had received LEN or another Tx as their most recent therapy. The latter finding suggests that POM can be used after relapse or resistance to LEN and that there is no need to replace an IMiD agent with another class of treatment. Disclosures Decaux: Celgene Corporation, Janssen, Takeda, Amgen: Honoraria. Macro:Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Financial Support. Gourgou:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lachenal:Celgene: Other: Scientific Comittee's. Stoppa:Celgene: Honoraria. Jaccard:Abbvie: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria. Moreau:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Perrot:jannsen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria. Mohty:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding. Karlin:AMGEN: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Support; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Support; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fohrer:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Leleu:Carsgen: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Oncopeptide: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Hulin:celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen, AbbVie, Celgene, Amgen: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Survival Benefit of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (IRD) over Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients in Routine Clinical Practice

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiri Minarik ◽  
Tomas Pika ◽  
Jakub Radocha ◽  
Alexandra Jungova ◽  
Jan Straub ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Survival Endpoints

Abstract Background: We have performed a head to head comparison of all-oral triplet combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRD) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (RD) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the routine clinical practice. Methods: A total of 344 patients treated with IRD (N=127) or RD (N=217) were selected for analysis from the Czech Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies (RMG). Descriptive statistics were used to assess patient’s characteristics associated with the respective therapy. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), secondary end points included response rates and overall survival (OS). Survival endpoints were plotted using Kaplan-Meier methodology at 95% Greenwood confidence interval. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the effect of treatment regimens and the significance of uneven variables. Statistical tests were performed at significance level 0.05.Results: In the whole cohort, median PFS for IRD was 17.5 and for RD was 11.5 months favoring the all-oral triplet, p = 0.005; in patients within relapse 1-3, the median PFS was 23.1 vs 11.6 months, p = 0.001. The hazard ratio for PFS was 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51 – 0.89, p = 0.006). The PFS advantage translated into improved OS for patients treated with IRD, median 36.6 months vs 26.0 months (p = 0.008). The overall response rate (ORR) was 73.0 % in the IRD group vs 66.2 % in the RD group with a complete response rate (CR) of 11.1 % vs 8.8 %, and very good partial response (VGPR) 22.2 % vs 13.9 %, IRD vs RD respectively. The IRD regimen was most beneficial in patients ≤75 years with ISS I, II, and in the first and second relapse. Patients with the presence of extramedullary disease did not benefit from IRD treatment (median PFS 6.5 months). Both regimens were well tolerated, and the incidence of total as well as grade 3/4 toxicities was comparable. Conclusions: Our analysis confirms the results of the TOURMALINE-MM1 study and shows benefit of all-oral triplet IRD treatment versus RD doublet. It demonstrates that the addition of ixazomib to RD improves key survival endpoints in patients with RRMM in a routine clinical setting.

scholarly journals Survival Benefit of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (IRD) Over Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients in Routine Clinical Practice

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiri Minarik ◽  
Tomas Pika ◽  
Jakub Radocha ◽  
Alexandra Jungova ◽  
Jan Straub ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Survival Endpoints

Abstract Background: We have performed a head to head comparison of all-oral triplet combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRD) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (RD) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the routine clinical practice. Methods: A total of 344 patients treated with IRD (N=127) or RD (N=217) were selected for analysis from the Czech Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies (RMG). Descriptive statistics were used to assess patient’s characteristics associated with the respective therapy. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), secondary end points included response rates and overall survival (OS). Survival endpoints were plotted using Kaplan-Meier methodology at 95% Greenwood confidence interval. Univariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the effect of treatment regimen. Statistical tests were performed at significance level 0.05.Results: In the whole cohort, PFS for IRD was 17.5 and for RD was 11.5 months favoring the all-oral triplet, p = 0.005; in patients within relapse 1-3, the median PFS was 23.1 vs 11.6 months, p = 0.001. The hazard ratio for PFS was 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51 – 0.89, p = 0.006). The PFS advantage translated into improved OS for patients treated with IRD, median 36.6 months vs 26.0 months (p = 0.008). The overall response rate (ORR) was 73.0 % in the IRD group vs 66.2 % in the RD group with a complete response rate (CR) of 11.1 % vs 8.8 %, and very good partial response (VGPR) 22.2 % vs 13.9 %, IRD vs RD respectively. The IRD regimen was most beneficial in patients ≤75 years with ISS I, II, and in the first and second relapse. Patients with the presence of extramedullary disease did not benefit from IRD treatment (median PFS 6.5 months). Both regimens were well tolerated, and the incidence of total as well as grade 3/4 toxicities was comparable. Conclusions: Our analysis confirms the results of the TOURMALINE-MM1 study and shows benefit of all-oral triplet IRD treatment versus RD doublet. It demonstrates that the addition of ixazomib to RD improves key survival endpoints in patients with RRMM in a routine clinical setting.

scholarly journals Ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in routine clinical practice: effectiveness in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman Hájek ◽  
Jiří Minařík ◽  
Jan Straub ◽  
Luděk Pour ◽  
Alexandra Jungova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Dose Reductions

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in routine clinical practice. Patients & methods: Patient-level data from the global, observational INSIGHT MM and the Czech Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies were integrated and analyzed. Results: At data cut-off, 263 patients from 13 countries were included. Median time from diagnosis to start of IRd was 35.8 months; median duration of follow-up was 14.8 months. Overall response rate was 73%, median progression-free survival, 21.2 months and time-to-next therapy, 33.0 months. Ixazomib/lenalidomide dose reductions were required in 17%/36% of patients; 32%/30% of patients discontinued ixazomib/lenalidomide due to adverse events. Conclusion: The effectiveness and safety of IRd in routine clinical practice are comparable to those reported in TOURMALINE-MM1. Clinical trial registration: NCT02761187 (ClinicalTrials.gov)

scholarly journals Overview of French Routine Clinical Practice for the Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia (CIA) with Biosimilar Epoetin Alfa in 563 Patients with Lymphoid Malignancies: A National Observational Study (The OncoBOS study)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3342-3342
Author(s):  
Lionel Karlin ◽  
Jean-Philippe Metges ◽  
Nataliya Khobta ◽  
Gilles Boschetti ◽  
Alain Toledano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Treatment Period ◽  
Blood Cells ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Lymphoid Malignancies

Abstract Background. OncoBOS is a prospective, non-interventional study conducted in France to describe modalities of treatment with Binocrit® in routine clinical practice setting, for the correction of hemoglobin (Hb) in patients with CIA receiving chemotherapy (CT) for solid tumors, lymphoma or myeloma. This analysis focuses on patients with lymphoid malignancies (LM). Patients & methods. Patient ≥18 years old with LM, CIA and eligible for treatment with Binocrit® were included. This analysis reports patients characteristics along with anemia-related data such as Hb outcomes, Binocrit® treatment characteristics and concomitant treatments received, at baseline, 3-4 weeks and 12 (± 1) weeks later. Factors associated with a Hb increase ≥2 g/dL in patients with LM were analyzed by means of univariate and multivariate analyses. Results. 563 evaluable patients (302 males (53.6%), mean age 67.9 (SD 14.0) years were recruited from 34 sites, between September 2011 and July 2014. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (281 patients; 49.9%) and multiple myeloma (165 patients; 29.3%) were most prevalent. Among patients with NHL, 46.0% had a diffuse large B cell lymphoma, 11.5% a follicular lymphoma and 11.1% a mantle cell lymphoma. 62.5% of patients with NHL had a stage IV disease and bone marrow was involved by NHL in 45.2% of patients. A vast majority of patients (84.3%) suffering from multiple myeloma had a Durie-Salmon stage III myeloma. Mean baseline Hb was 9.5 (SD 1.0) g/dL, which increased by an average of 0.9 (SD 1.4) g/dL and 1.9 (SD 1.7) g/dL after 1 and 3 months, respectively. A Hb increase ≥1 g/dL was achieved by 51.3% of patients after 3-4 weeks of treatment with Binocrit®. About half of patients (53.0%) achieved a Hb increase ≥2 g/dL at week 12 (± 1). Patients received a mean Binocrit® dose of 31252.4 ± (SD 5815.9; median: 30000) UI once-weekly, over an average time span of 10.8 (SD 3.2; median: 13) weeks. Iron status (serum ferritin and transferrin saturation coefficient) was assessed in 29.1% of subjects at baseline. In total, 2.8% and 1.4% of patients concomitantly received oral or intravenous iron, respectively, during the follow-up period. 12.1% and 11.6% of patients received a folate supplementation at week 3-4 and 12, respectively. Moreover, 16.2% and 15.0% of patients received red blood cells transfusion over the 3-4 first weeks, and over the next 2 months, respectively. Over the treatment period, no treatment‐related adverse reaction was recorded. Factors negatively/positively associated with a Hb increase ≥2 g/dL (p<0.05) in the multivariate analysis were: prior radiotherapy [HR 0.16 (CI95% 0.04;0.64)]; history of venous thrombotic disease [HR 1.93 (1.14;3.28)]; administration of folate during the follow-up [HR 2.43 (1.69;3.49)]; a Hb level < 8 or [8;10[ g/dL at inclusion [HR 3.04 (1.97;4.69) and HR 1.62 (1.25;2.11), respectively]; 2 units of red blood cells received over the treatment period [HR 2.82 (1.91;4.16)]. Conclusions. This study indicates that in real-life clinical conditions Binocrit® increases effectively Hb, without any adverse drug reaction, in anemic patients with lymphoid malignancies, whatever chemotherapy received. The effect of treatment with Binocrit® is rapid, with mean hemoglobin increase of 0.9 (SD1.4) g/dL seen as early as 3 or 4 weeks following the start of therapy. Disclosures Karlin: Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria. Metges:Sandoz: Consultancy. Khobta:Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Boschetti:Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Toledano:Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Aubron-Olivier:Sandoz: Employment. Fernet:Sandoz: Employment. Fitoussi:Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Survival benefit of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRD) over lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients in routine clinical practice

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiri Minarik ◽  
Tomas Pika ◽  
Jakub Radocha ◽  
Alexandra Jungova ◽  
Jan Straub ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Survival Endpoints

Abstract Background We have performed a head to head comparison of all-oral triplet combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRD) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (RD) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the routine clinical practice. Methods A total of 344 patients treated with IRD (N = 127) or RD (N = 217) were selected for analysis from the Czech Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies (RMG). Descriptive statistics were used to assess patient’s characteristics associated with the respective therapy. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), secondary end points included response rates and overall survival (OS). Survival endpoints were plotted using Kaplan-Meier methodology at 95% Greenwood confidence interval. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the effect of treatment regimens and the significance of uneven variables. Statistical tests were performed at significance level 0.05. Results In the whole cohort, median PFS for IRD was 17.5 and for RD was 11.5 months favoring the all-oral triplet, p = 0.005; in patients within relapse 1–3, the median PFS was 23.1 vs 11.6 months, p = 0.001. The hazard ratio for PFS was 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51–0.89, p = 0.006). The PFS advantage translated into improved OS for patients treated with IRD, median 36.6 months vs 26.0 months (p = 0.008). The overall response rate (ORR) was 73.0% in the IRD group vs 66.2% in the RD group with a complete response rate (CR) of 11.1% vs 8.8%, and very good partial response (VGPR) 22.2% vs 13.9%, IRD vs RD respectively. The IRD regimen was most beneficial in patients ≤75 years with ISS I, II, and in the first and second relapse. Patients with the presence of extramedullary disease did not benefit from IRD treatment (median PFS 6.5 months). Both regimens were well tolerated, and the incidence of total as well as grade 3/4 toxicities was comparable. Conclusions Our analysis confirms the results of the TOURMALINE-MM1 study and shows benefit of all-oral triplet IRD treatment versus RD doublet. It demonstrates that the addition of ixazomib to RD improves key survival endpoints in patients with RRMM in a routine clinical setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document