Deposition and erosion behaviour of cohesive sediments in the upper River Taw observatory, southwest UK: Implications for management and modelling

2021 ◽  
Vol 598 ◽  
pp. 126145
Author(s):  
M. Stone ◽  
B.G. Krishnappan ◽  
S. Granger ◽  
H.R. Upadhayay ◽  
Y. Zhang ◽  
...  
1996 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 215-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chandramouli Nalluri ◽  
Aminuddin Ab. Ghani

A list of available codes of practice for self-cleansing sewers is presented and a review of appraisals of minimum velocity criterion is summarised. Comparisons of newly developed “minimum velocity” criteria and “minimum shear stress” criterion are presented. Some design charts are also given. These charts are applicable to non-cohesive sediments (typically storm sewers). It appears that sediment size and concentration need to be taken into account, and that a limited depth of sediment bed is recommended for large pipes (diameters > 1000 mm) to maximise their transport capacity.


2019 ◽  
Vol 362 ◽  
pp. 366-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hitesh Vasudev ◽  
Lalit Thakur ◽  
Amit Bansal ◽  
Harmeet Singh ◽  
Sunny Zafar

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 588-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Hong ◽  
Y P Wu ◽  
Q Wang ◽  
G Y Li ◽  
G B Ying ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dake Chen ◽  
Bruce Melville ◽  
Jinhai Zheng ◽  
Yigang Wang ◽  
Chi Zhang ◽  
...  

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 1435
Author(s):  
Peng Hu ◽  
Junyu Tao ◽  
Aofei Ji ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
Zhiguo He

In this paper, a computationally efficient shallow water model is developed for sediment transport in the Yangtze estuary by considering mixed cohesive and non-cohesive sediment transport. It is firstly shown that the model is capable of reproducing tidal-hydrodynamics in the estuarine region. Secondly, it is demonstrated that the observed temporal variation of suspended sediment concentration (SSC) for mixed cohesive and non-cohesive sediments can be well-captured by the model with calibrated parameters (i.e., critical shear stresses for erosion/deposition, erosion coefficient). Numerical comparative studies indicate that: (1) consideration of multiple sediment fraction (both cohesive and non-cohesive sediments) is important for accurate modeling of SSC in the Yangtze Estuary; (2) the critical shear stress and the erosion coefficient is shown to be site-dependent, for which intensive calibration may be required; and (3) the Deepwater Navigation Channel (DNC) project may lead to enhanced current velocity and thus reduced sediment deposition in the North Passage of the Yangtze Estuary. Finally, the implementation of the hybrid local time step/global maximum time step (LTS/GMaTS) (using LTS to update the hydro-sediment module but using GMaTS to update the morphodynamic module) can lead to a reduction of as high as 90% in the computational cost for the Yangtze Estuary. This advantage, along with its well-demonstrated quantitative accuracy, indicates that the present model should find wide applications in estuarine regions.


Minerals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 721
Author(s):  
Ukhwan Byun ◽  
A.J. (Tom) van Loon ◽  
Kyoungtae Ko

The Gyeokpori Formation in the Buan volcanic area primarily contains siliciclastic rocks interbedded with volcanoclastics. These sediments are characterized by a variety of soft-sediment deformation structures (SSDS). The SSDS in the Gyeokpori Formation are embedded in poorly sorted conglomerates; slump folds are also present in the formation. The deformation mechanisms and triggers causing the deformation are not yet clear. In the present study, the trigger of the SSDS in the Gyeokpori Formation was investigated using facies analysis. This included evaluation of the reworking process of both cohesive and non-cohesive sediments. The analysis indicates that the SSDS are directly or indirectly associated with the alternation of conglomerates and mud layers with clasts. These layers underwent non-cohesive and cohesive deformation, respectively, which promoted SSDS formation. The slump folds were controlled by the extent of cohesive and non-cohesive deformation experienced by the sediment layers in the slope environment. The SSDS deformation style and morphology differ, particularly in the case of reworking by slump activity. This study contributes to the understanding of lacustrine slope-related soft-sediment deformation structures.


Author(s):  
B. Somasundaram ◽  
B.C. Navinesh ◽  
Nagasureshbabu ◽  
N. Jegadeeswaran
Keyword(s):  

Processes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1252
Author(s):  
Hadar Elyashiv ◽  
Revital Bookman ◽  
Lennart Siemann ◽  
Uri ten Brink ◽  
Katrin Huhn

The Discrete Element Method has been widely used to simulate geo-materials due to time and scale limitations met in the field and laboratories. While cohesionless geo-materials were the focus of many previous studies, the deformation of cohesive geo-materials in 3D remained poorly characterized. Here, we aimed to generate a range of numerical ‘sediments’, assess their mechanical response to stress and compare their response with laboratory tests, focusing on differences between the micro- and macro-material properties. We simulated two endmembers—clay (cohesive) and sand (cohesionless). The materials were tested in a 3D triaxial numerical setup, under different simulated burial stresses and consolidation states. Variations in particle contact or individual bond strengths generate first order influence on the stress–strain response, i.e., a different deformation style of the numerical sand or clay. Increased burial depth generates a second order influence, elevating peak shear strength. Loose and dense consolidation states generate a third order influence of the endmember level. The results replicate a range of sediment compositions, empirical behaviors and conditions. We propose a procedure to characterize sediments numerically. The numerical ‘sediments’ can be applied to simulate processes in sediments exhibiting variations in strength due to post-seismic consolidation, bioturbation or variations in sedimentation rates.


2020 ◽  
Vol 148 ◽  
pp. 106315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Huang ◽  
Xiang Ding ◽  
Cheng-Qing Yuan ◽  
Zhong-Kun Yu ◽  
Zhang-Xiong Ding

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document