Labia Majora Lift. for Whom? When? How? What Is Next?

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. S116
Author(s):  
E.B. Piskunova
Keyword(s):  
Labia Majora

Common Lesion in an Uncommon Site-Unilateral Fibroadenoma with Lactation Changes in Ectopic Breast in Right Labia Majora

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 263-264
Author(s):  
Dr. G.J. Vani Padmaja ◽  
◽  
T.SUNDERI DEVI ◽  
S.Rajyalakshmi S.Rajyalakshmi
Keyword(s):  
Labia Majora ◽  
Ectopic Breast

Antiretroviral Treatment-Associated Labia Majora Lipohypertrophy: A Rare Case and Plastic Surgical Treatment Options

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Akmal Hisham ◽  
Devananthan Ilenghoven ◽  
Wan Syazli Wan Ahmad Kamal ◽  
Salina Ibrahim ◽  
Shah Jumaat Mohd Yussof
Keyword(s):  
Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Daily Living ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Hiv Positive ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Labia Majora ◽  
The Face ◽  
Central Fat

The emergence of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has revolutionized the prognosis of HIV-infected patients. However, the extended use of HAART is associated with a disfiguring complication termed lipodystrophy, a disorder of body fat maldistribution causing peripheral fat loss (lipoatrophy) and central fat accumulation (lipohypertrophy). Lipoatrophy commonly affects the face, legs, buttocks and arm, whilst lipohypertrophy frequently favours the abdomen, breast and dorsocervical region. To our knowledge, we present only the second documented case in the literature of a labia majora lipohypertrophy in a HIV-positive patient receiving long-term HAART. The severity of labial abnormality caused significant physical and functional morbidities. Labiaplasty with dermolipectomy of the labia majora and excisional lipectomy of the mons pubis was successfully performed. At a 6-month follow-up, patient had no recurrence with resolution of symptoms and resumption of normal activities of daily living (ADL).

Scrotal Construction by Expansion of Labia Majora in Biological Female Transsexuals

1993 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 372-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Sengezer ◽  
Richard C. Sadove
Keyword(s):  
Labia Majora

36-Year-Old Female with Bright Red Plaques on the Labia Majora

2019 ◽  
pp. 45-51
Author(s):  
Kevin K. Wu ◽  
Michael P. Lee ◽  
Jashin J. Wu
Keyword(s):  
Labia Majora

scholarly journals 109 Steatocystoma Simplex in Labia Majora

2018 ◽  
Vol 149 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S47-S47
Author(s):  
Xiangdong Xu ◽  
Jingwen Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Labia Majora

Accessory breasts in the labia majora

1927 ◽  
Vol 15 (58) ◽  
pp. 279-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Purves ◽  
J. A. Hadley
Keyword(s):  
Labia Majora

scholarly journals Histological and Gene Expression Analysis of the Effects of Menopause Status and Hormone Therapy on the Vaginal Introitus and Labia Majora

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 745-759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Binder ◽  
Murray A. Freedman ◽  
Kailash B. Sharma ◽  
Miranda A. Farage ◽  
Yu Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Hormone Therapy ◽  
Expression Analysis ◽  
Gene Expression Analysis ◽  
Labia Majora ◽  
Vaginal Introitus

scholarly journals A large fibroma polyp of labia majora

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 762
Author(s):  
Aman Deep Raj ◽  
Murali Mohan Soma ◽  
S. P. Khajuria
Keyword(s):  
Stromal Cells ◽  
Surface Epithelium ◽  
Myxoid Stroma ◽  
Labia Majora ◽  
The One

Fibroepithelial stromal polyps are benign proliferations which are usually polypoid or pedunculated, and less than 5cm in size. They are generally single lesions but can be multiple during pregnancy. They can be polypoid or pedunculated and are usually solitary. Symptoms usually include bleeding, discharge and general discomfort with sensation of a mass. They typically have a central fibrovascular core and contain stellate and multinucleated stromal cells which are best seen beneath the surface epithelium. True myxoid stroma is absent. Although vulvovaginal fibroepithelial stromal polyps are well documented, a giant variant such as the one authors report here is rather rare. To the knowledge, present case is the largest fibroepithelial stromal polyp compared to others reported in the literature.

Defining Ideal External Female Genital Anatomy Via Crowdsourcing Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianfranco Frojo ◽  
Aurora M Kareh ◽  
Kenneth X Probst ◽  
Jeffrey D Rector ◽  
Christina M Plikaitis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rank Order ◽  
Amazon Mechanical Turk ◽  
Width Ratio ◽  
Significant Preference ◽  
Labia Minora ◽  
Labia Majora ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Factor Modeling ◽  
Aesthetic Characteristics ◽  
Clitoral Hood

Abstract Background Despite existing anthropometric data in the literature regarding the variation of female external genital anatomy, the ideal aesthetic characteristics have yet to be defined. Objectives Authors used crowdsourcing in order to better evaluate preferred anatomic characteristics of external female genitalia. Methods Fifty-six total images were digitally created by altering the proportions of the labia minora, labia majora, and clitoral hood. Images with differing ratios were presented in pairs to Amazon Mechanical Turk (Seattle, WA, USA) raters. Three different experiments were performed with each varying two of the three image characteristics to permit two factor modeling. The Bradley-Terry-Luce model was applied to the pairwise comparisons ratings to create a rank order for each image. Preferences for each anatomic variable were compared using chi-squared tests. Results A total of 5000 raters participated. Experiment 1 compared differing widths of the labia majora and labia minora and determined a significant preference for larger labia majora width and mid-range labia minora width (p=0.007). Experiment 2 compared labia minora width versus clitoral hood length and showed a statistically significant preference for wider majoras (p<.001), but no significant preference in clitoral hood length (p=0.54). Experiment 3 compared clitoral hood length versus labia minora width and showed a statistically significant preference for mid-range labia minora widths (p<.001) but no significant preference in clitoral hood length (p=0.78). Conclusions Raters preferred a labia majora to labia minora width ratio of 3:1 with minimal preference in clitoral hood length.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document