Tensile and torsional strain gauge based on Fe48Co32P14B6 metallic glass

2019 ◽  
Vol 476 ◽  
pp. 382-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.S. Ignakhin ◽  
V.S. Severikov ◽  
A.M. Grishin
1988 ◽  
Vol 64 (10) ◽  
pp. 5427-5427
Author(s):  
K. P. Koo ◽  
D. M. Dagenais ◽  
F. Bucholtz ◽  
A. Dandridge

1945 ◽  
Vol 153 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Ker Wilson

The seismic torsiograph is commonly used for recording torsional vibration because it can be applied to many different types of oscillating system without elaborate preparatory measures. This instrument is available in several types each suitable for a particular measuring range so that there is little difficulty in selecting equipment to record with reasonable accuracy, the vibratory motion at a chosen point in any present-day transmission system. The motion recorded by a seismic instrument may, however, be very complex; and this implies that care must be taken when attempting to interpret the records in terms of shaft stress, particularly at non-resonant speeds. This problem can be very difficult, and is discussed in the present paper with the help of typical examples. It is shown that the interpretation of records obtained at resonant speeds is comparatively straight-forward, provided that the system is reasonably linear and does not contain components having a complex distribution of mass and, or alternatively, elasticity. Methods for computing shaft stresses from measured amplitudes are discussed, and attention is drawn to the use which can be made of tabulation methods when dealing with records obtained at non-resonant speeds and with systems containing complex components or having a marked degree of non-linearity. Cases where shaft stresses at non-resonant as well as at resonant speeds must be taken into account are by no means unknown. It is shown that under certain conditions a seismic type torsiograph will show no appreciable response or will become very unreliable at some non-resonant speeds. Finally, attention is drawn to the use of torsional strain gauges as an alternative to seismic torsiographs. The strain gauge method enables measurements of total shaft stresses to be made even if the system is markedly non-linear or contains complex components. The development of compact and reliable torsional strain gauge equipment for general use appears to be desirable.


2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (SI) ◽  
pp. SIIG10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yen-Chi Lu ◽  
Chun-Yu Chiang ◽  
Yu-Chieh Chen ◽  
Yu-Ching Lin ◽  
Takahito Ono ◽  
...  

1985 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Lançon ◽  
L. Billard ◽  
J. Laugier ◽  
A. Chamberod

Phlebologie ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 31 (04) ◽  
pp. 85-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.-M. Häfner ◽  
H. Bablich ◽  
G. Rassner ◽  
M. Jünger ◽  
A. Steins

Zusammenfassung Ziel: Überprüfung der Korrelation der photooptischen Venenfunktionstests Lichtreflexionsrheographie (LRR), digitale Photoplethysmographie (DPPG) und der Quecksilberdehnungsstreifen- Plethysmographie (Hg-strain gauge) mit der Phlebodynamometrie (PDM). Methode: Die simultane Messung von LRR, DPPG, Hg-strain gauge und PDM wurde an 34 Patienten mit chronischer venöser Insuffizienz in den klinischen Stadien I bis III nach Widmer an insgesamt 39 Unterschenkeln vorgenommen. Die Messungen erfolgten während Dorsalextension des Fußes in sitzender und während Plantarflexion des Fußes in stehender Position. Als Parameter für die Ermittlung des Korrelationskoeffizienten wurden die Wiederauffüllzeiten t0 und t1/2 sowie die venöse Abpumpleistung ermittelt. Ergebnisse: Unabhängig von Körperposition und Anlage von Tourniquets erreichten die Korrelationen für alle Messverfahren und Parameter Werte zwischen r = 0,76 (t0 LRR) und r = 0,05 (Abpumpleistung DPPG automatische Auswertung). Eine gute Korrelation von t0 wurde in stehender Körperposition unabhängig von der Anlage der Tourniquets beim Hg-strain gauge (r = 0,49) und LRR (r = 0,51) erreicht. Diese Korrelation verbesserte sich in sitzender Körperposition. Die schlechteste Korrelation wurde bei der DPPG ermittelt (r = 0,25 in stehender, r = 0,51 in sitzender Position). Eine Verbesserung der Korrelation wurde beim DPPG durch die manuelle Auswertung der Kurven erreicht. Schlussfolgerung: Sowohl die Wahl des Untersuchungsverfahrens wie auch das gewählte Belastungsprogramm können erhebliche Auswirkungen auf die Korrelation mit der PDM haben. Unsere Ergebnisse zeigen, dass bei der Bewertung der Wiederauffüllzeiten t0 und t1/2 der Hg-strain gauge und die LRR die höchste Korrelation bei Dorsalextension in sitzender Körperposition mit der PDM aufweisen.


1982 ◽  
Vol 47 (02) ◽  
pp. 141-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Bounameaux ◽  
B Krähenbühl ◽  
S Vukanovic

SummaryDoppler ultrasound flow examination, strain gauge plethysmography and contrast venography were performed in 160 lower limbs of 80 in-patients. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was suspected in 87 limbs. Using measurement of venous stop-flow pressure, the Doppler method had an overall sensitivity of 83%. By combined use of Doppler and Plethysmography, sensitivity was increased to 96%. Specificity was 62% and 51%, respectively. With a positive and a negative predictive value of 80% and 73%, respectively, the combination of both non-invasive methods cannot reliably replace venography in the diagnosis of DTV, although all (40/40) thromboses proximal to or involving the popliteal segment were detected by either Doppler and Plethysmography or both.After exclusion of 14 patients (18%) suffering from conditions known to alter the results of these non-invasive methods, the positive predictive value of abnormal findings in both Doppler and Plethysmography was increased to 94% for suspected limbs, whilst negative predictive value of both negative Doppler and Plethysmography was 90%, allowing the avoidance of venography in these patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 139 (4) ◽  
pp. 63-68
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Nakano ◽  
Masahiro Matsumoto ◽  
Yasuo Onose ◽  
Kazuhiro Ohta

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerii Semyonovich Volobuyev ◽  
Anton Roaldovich Gorbushin ◽  
Iraida Alekseevna Sudakova ◽  
V. I. Tikhomirov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document