scholarly journals Clinical Utility of a High-Resolution Melting Test for Screening Numerical Chromosomal Abnormalities in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-531
Author(s):  
Yulin Zhou ◽  
Wenyan Xu ◽  
Yancheng Jiang ◽  
Zhongmin Xia ◽  
Haixia Zhang ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (12) ◽  
pp. 1433-1440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lan Yang ◽  
Ye Tang ◽  
Mudan Lu ◽  
Yuefen Yang ◽  
Jianping Xiao ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shan Li ◽  
Mei Chen ◽  
Peng-Sheng Zheng

AbstractThe frequency and distribution of chromosomal abnormalities and the impact of parental chromosomal aberration on the pregnancy outcomes of couples with recurrent pregnancy loss remains controversial. 3235 RPL couples who experienced two or more miscarriages before 20 weeks were diagnosed in our tertiary referral hospital during 2008–2018 and included in the single-center retrospective cohort study covering a 10-year period. Chromosome aberration was detected in 121 (3.74%) among 3235 RPL couples which included 75 female and 46 male cases at an individual level. 101 cases were structural aberrations including balanced translocations in 46(38.0%) cases, Robertsonian translocations in 13(10.7%) cases, inversions in 42(34.7%) cases and 20(16.5%) cases were numerical aberrations. 121 carriers and 428 non-carriers were followed up for two years, 55 carriers and 229 non-carriers were subsequent pregnant after diagnosis by natural conception or intrauterine insemination. The frequency of carriers to have a health newborn was not significantly different with non-carriers (72.7% vs. 71.2%, adjusted P = 0.968). This study described the majority of carriers were balanced translocations and chromosome aberrations had a limited influence on live birth rate from the present data. The results of the study also remind us that natural conception may be also a good alternative rather than PGD (Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis) which is common in many other reproductive centers for such patients.


Author(s):  
Laura Kasak ◽  
Kristiina Rull ◽  
Tao Yang ◽  
Dan M. Roden ◽  
Maris Laan

Background Recurrent pregnancy loss affects 1% to 2% of couples attempting childbirth. A large fraction of all cases remains idiopathic, which warrants research into monogenic causes of this distressing disorder. Methods and Results We investigated a nonconsanguineous Estonian family who had experienced 5 live births, intersected by 3 early pregnancy losses, and 6 fetal deaths, 3 of which occurred during the second trimester. No fetal malformations were described at the autopsies performed in 3 of 6 cases of fetal death. Parental and fetal chromosomal abnormalities (including submicroscopic) and maternal risk factors were excluded. Material for genetic testing was available from 4 miscarried cases (gestational weeks 11, 14, 17, and 18). Exome sequencing in 3 pregnancy losses and the mother identified no rare variants explicitly shared by the miscarried conceptuses. However, the mother and 2 pregnancy losses carried a heterozygous nonsynonymous variant, resulting in p.Val173Asp ( rs199472695 ) in the ion channel gene KCNQ1 . It is expressed not only in heart, where mutations cause type 1 long‐QT syndrome, but also in other tissues, including uterus. The p.Val173Asp variant has been previously identified in a patient with type 1 long‐QT syndrome, but not reported in the Genome Aggregation Database. With heterologous expression in CHO cells, our in vitro electrophysiologic studies indicated that the mutant slowly activating voltage‐gated K+ channel ( I Ks ) is dysfunctional. It showed reduced total activating and deactivating currents ( P <0.01), with dramatically positive shift of voltage dependence of activation by ≈10 mV ( P <0.05). Conclusions The current study uncovered concealed maternal type 1 long‐QT syndrome as a potential novel cause behind recurrent fetal loss.


Author(s):  
Bahareh Mazrouei ◽  
Mohammad Mehdi Heidari ◽  
Mehri Khatami ◽  
Maryam Tahmasebi

Introduction: Pregnancy and health is the process in which the egg is fertilized and being able to survive. When pregnancy occurs under some conditions and the fetus is being at risk, it will lead to abortion that occurs involuntarily and spontaneously. Abortions that occur more than two or three times are called recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Various etiological factors involved in RPL, including environmental, pathological and genetic factors. The environmental factors that often related to an inappropriate lifestyle, and endanger the pregnancy. The pathological factors are including autoimmune, infectious, endocrine and anatomical factors. The genetic factors are including several structural and chromosomal abnormalities. The majority of chromosomal abnormalities are including trisomy, polyploidy, and monosomy X. The structural abnormalities due to chromosomal cleavage, which may be balanced or unbalanced. However, a large number of these abortions do not have any clear reason, so molecular studies have shown that these types of recurrent pregnancy losses are related to the gene disorders of the mother. The function of these genes shows that they are associated with the process of formation, implantation and maintenance, fetal growth and development, and so on. This review focuses on the genetic and molecular abnormalities that may involve in the occurrence of recurrent pregnancy loss to choose the appropriate treatment for couples who suffer from RPL, based on the type of disorder.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 356-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myrthe M van Dijk ◽  
Astrid M Kolte ◽  
Jacqueline Limpens ◽  
Emma Kirk ◽  
Siobhan Quenby ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) occurs in 1–3% of all couples trying to conceive. No consensus exists regarding when to perform testing for risk factors in couples with RPL. Some guidelines recommend testing if a patient has had two pregnancy losses whereas others advise to test after three losses. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current evidence on the prevalence of abnormal test results for RPL amongst patients with two versus three or more pregnancy losses. We also aimed to contribute to the debate regarding whether the investigations for RPL should take place after two or three or more pregnancy losses. SEARCH METHODS Relevant studies were identified by a systematic search in OVID Medline and EMBASE from inception to March 2019. A search for RPL was combined with a broad search for terms indicative of number of pregnancy losses, screening/testing for pregnancy loss or the prevalence of known risk factors. Meta-analyses were performed in case of adequate clinical and statistical homogeneity. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. OUTCOMES From a total of 1985 identified publications, 21 were included in this systematic review and 19 were suitable for meta-analyses. For uterine abnormalities (seven studies, odds ratio (OR) 1.00, 95% CI 0.79–1.27, I2 = 0%) and for antiphospholipid syndrome (three studies, OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.86–1.25, I2 = 0%) we found low quality evidence for a lack of a difference in prevalence of abnormal test results between couples with two versus three or more pregnancy losses. We found insufficient evidence of a difference in prevalence of abnormal test results between couples with two versus three or more pregnancy losses for chromosomal abnormalities (10 studies, OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.55–1.10), inherited thrombophilia (five studies) and thyroid disorders (two studies, OR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.06–4.56). WIDER IMPLICATIONS A difference in prevalence in uterine abnormalities and antiphospholipid syndrome is unlikely in women with two versus three pregnancy losses. We cannot exclude a difference in prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities, inherited thrombophilia and thyroid disorders following testing after two versus three pregnancy losses. The results of this systematic review may support investigations after two pregnancy losses in couples with RPL, but it should be stressed that additional studies of the prognostic value of test results used in the RPL population are urgently needed. An evidenced-based treatment is not currently available in the majority of cases when abnormal test results are present.


Author(s):  
R. J McKinlay Gardner ◽  
David J Amor

Human conception and pregnancy is both a vulnerable and a robust process. It is vulnerable in that a large proportion of all conceptions are chromosomally abnormal, with the great majority of such pregnancies aborting. It is robust in that more than 99% of the time, a term pregnancy results in a chromosomally normal baby; unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities are seen in less than 1% of newborns. This chapter considers the somewhat surprising vulnerability of the human species to chromosome abnormality, from prior to, at, and following conception. A remarkable fraction of pregnancy loss is due to chromosomal imbalance, and there is an associated maternal age effect. This chapter considers the chromosomal contribution to miscarriage, fetal death in utero, and perinatal death. Recurrent pregnancy loss may have a chromosomal basis, and male and female infertility may relate to abnormality of, in particular, the sex chromosomes. The genetics of hydatidiform mole is reviewed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document