Impact of 123 i-ioflupane spect on real-life clinical decision making - follow up of 99 patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 381 ◽  
pp. 217
Author(s):  
Z. Balazova ◽  
H. Kasparkova ◽  
A. Pospisilova ◽  
M. Balaz
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Clinical Decision

Patient-centric care in bladder cancer: Virtual simulation to benefit clinical decision-making of oncologists.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 492-492
Author(s):  
Kinjal Parikh ◽  
Donna L. Topping ◽  
Saee Dhoble ◽  
Jacob Cohen ◽  
Haleh Kadkhoda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Decision Point ◽  
Appropriate Therapy ◽  
Specific Factors ◽  
Disease Specific

492 Background: Immunotherapy (IO) utility in bladder cancer (UC) has expanded into multiple stages of disease. Employing IO optimally requires mastery of clinical trial data, patient eligibility criteria, and interpretation of biomarkers and determination of treatment sequencing. Given the nuanced therapeutic decision-making, education was developed in partnership between Medscape Oncology and Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) to assist oncologists in improving their performance surrounding the management of patients with advanced UC. Methods: A virtual patient simulation (VPS) continuing medical education (CME)-certified activity depicting 2 advanced UC cases was made available to oncologist members of Medscape. The cases depicted 1) a patient with newly diagnosed metastatic UC with comorbidities and PDL1+ disease and 2) a patient with advanced UC progressing on platinum therapy with no actionable mutations. The VPS platform captures real-life decision making process of oncologists in an EHR-like format supported by an extensive database of diagnostic and treatment possibilities. Learners were able to interact with patients via video, order lab tests, assess patients, make diagnoses, and order treatments matching the scope and depth of actual practice. Tailored clinical guidance (CG) employing up-to-date evidence-based and faculty recommendations was provided after each decision point. Decisions were collected pre- and post-CG and analyzed using McNemar’s test to determine p-values. Data were collected from 4/28/20 to 7/13/20. Results: Analyses from oncologists (n = 51-66) found significant improvement in performance measured pre- to-post CG: Case 1: Ordering appropriate testing to determine patient eligibility for therapy (39% pre; 65% post; p < .001) Prescribing appropriate therapy based on patient- and disease-specific factors (38% pre; 77% post; p < .001) Providing appropriate counseling and follow-up for a patient receiving treatment (65% pre; 80% post; p < .01) Case 2: Ordering appropriate testing to determine patient eligibility for therapy (39% pre; 57% post; p < .01) Prescribing appropriate therapy based on patient- and disease-specific factors (25% pre; 41% post; p < .01) Providing appropriate counseling and follow-up for a patient receiving treatment (71% pre; 82% post; p < .05). Conclusions: This activity demonstrates the value of providing oncologists a simulation platform to practice and master clinical decision-making of the limitless possible diagnostic and therapeutic options in the management of advanced UC. Insights from rationales for each clinical decision point uncover continued gaps for oncologists on guideline recommendations, efficacy outcomes, or molecular implications. They also highlight barriers including limited experience or confidence with IO.

Between a logic of disruption and a logic of continuation: Negotiating the legitimacy of algorithms used in automated clinical decision-making

2021 ◽  
pp. 136345932199674
Author(s):  
Rikke Torenholt ◽  
Henriette Langstrup
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Involvement ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Diagnostic Procedures ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Pro Tools

In both popular and academic discussions of the use of algorithms in clinical practice, narratives often draw on the decisive potentialities of algorithms and come with the belief that algorithms will substantially transform healthcare. We suggest that this approach is associated with a logic of disruption. However, we argue that in clinical practice alongside this logic, another and less recognised logic exists, namely that of continuation: here the use of algorithms constitutes part of an established practice. Applying these logics as our analytical framing, we set out to explore how algorithms for clinical decision-making are enacted by political stakeholders, healthcare professionals, and patients, and in doing so, study how the legitimacy of delegating to an algorithm is negotiated and obtained. Empirically we draw on ethnographic fieldwork carried out in relation to attempts in Denmark to develop and implement Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) tools – involving algorithmic sorting – in clinical practice. We follow the work within two disease areas: heart rehabilitation and breast cancer follow-up care. We show how at the political level, algorithms constitute tools for disrupting inefficient work and unsystematic patient involvement, whereas closer to the clinical practice, algorithms constitute a continuation of standardised and evidence-based diagnostic procedures and a continuation of the physicians’ expertise and authority. We argue that the co-existence of the two logics have implications as both provide a push towards the use of algorithms and how a logic of continuation may divert attention away from new issues introduced with automated digital decision-support systems.

scholarly journals Routine Follow-Up Radiographs for Ankle Fractures Seldom Add Value to Clinical Decision-Making: A Retrospective, Observational Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 957-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieter van Gerven ◽  
Nikki L. Weil ◽  
Marco F. Termaat ◽  
Sidney M. Rubinstein ◽  
Mostafa El Moumni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Ankle Fractures ◽  
Retrospective Observational Study

Reversibility of Delirium in Palliative Care (DRAFT)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany Shaw ◽  
Eric Prommer
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Clinical Case ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Frequent Event ◽  
Study Intervention

Delirium is a frequent event in patients with advanced cancer. Untreated delirium affects assessment of symptoms, impairs communication including participation in clinical decision-making. This study used specific diagnostic criteria for delirium and prospectively identified precipitating causes of delirium. The study identified factors associated with reversible and irreversible delirium. Impact of delirium on prognosis was evaluated. This chapter describes the basics of the study, including funding, year study began, year study was published, study location, who was studied, who was excluded, how many patients, study design, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, gives a summary and discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case. Topics covered include delirium, neoplasms, palliative care, polypharmacy, risk factors, and therapeutics.

scholarly journals INNV-34. PATTERNS OF FAILURE AND DEVELOPMENT OF A NOVEL PROGNOSTIC SCORING SYSTEM IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH GLIOBLASTOMA – FOLLOW UP ON 10 YEAR ANALYSIS OF THE BC CANCER AGENCY POPULATION

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi137-vi137
Author(s):  
Jonathan Zeng ◽  
Kimberly DeVries ◽  
Andra Krauze
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Patient Stratification ◽  
Patterns Of Failure ◽  
Resection Status ◽  
Cancer Agency

Abstract PURPOSE Glioblastomas (GBM) are the most common primary brain tumour recurring in most patients despite maximal management. Patient selection for appropriate treatment modality remains challenging resulting in heterogeneity in management. We examined the patterns of failure and developed a scoring system for patient stratification to optimise clinical decision making. METHODS 822 adults (BC Cancer Agency registry) diagnosed 2005–2015 age ≥60 with histologically confirmed GBM ICD-O-3 codes (9440/3, 9441/3, 9442/3) were reviewed. Univariate and Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed. Performance status (PS), age and resection status were assigned a score, cummulative maximal (favorable) score of 10 and minimum (unfavorable) score of 3. Patterns of failure were further analysed in the subset of patients with radiographic follow-up. RESULTS PS score of 3(KPS >80, ECOG 0/1), 2 (KPS 60–70, ECOG 2), 1 (KPS < 60, ECOG 3/4) (median OS 11, 6, 3 months respectively), age score and resection status were prognostic for OS with PS resulting in the most significant curve separation (p< 0.0001). Biopsy as compared to STR/GTR resulted in poorer OS in patients over 70 (age score 1/2) but had less impact in patients younger than 70 (age scores 3/4). The median OS for cumulative scores of 9/10 (123 patients), 7/8 (286 patients), 5/6 (313 patients), and 3/4 (55 patients) were 14, 8, 4 and 2 months respectively (p< 0.0001) allowing for stratification into 4 prognostic groups. 133 patients had >3 MRIs following diagnosis allowing for clinical and radiographic analysis of progression. Clinical/radiographic progression occurred within 3 months (29%/45%), 6 months (50%/66%), 9 months (70%/81%). Progression type (radiographic, clinical, both was not associated with OS. CONCLUSION Our novel prognostic scoring system is effective in achieving patient stratification and may guide clinical decision making. Early radiographic progression appears to precede clinical deterioration and may represent true progression in the elderly.

scholarly journals P418 Does capsule endoscopy impact clinical management in established Crohn’s Disease?

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S423-S424
Author(s):  
A Elosua Gonzalez ◽  
M Rullan Iriarte ◽  
S Rubio Iturria ◽  
S Oquiñena Legaz ◽  
C Rodríguez Gutiérrez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
Clinical Management ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Mucosal Inflammation ◽  
Therapeutic Impact

Abstract Background Capsule endoscopy (SBCE) has developed a relevant role in different indications in patients with established Crohn’s Disease (CD). However, evaluation of its impact in clinical management in CD specific modification strategies has been scarce. The purpose of our study was to question therapeutic impact of SBCE in an 11-year real-life cohort of established CD patients. Methods Retrospective single center study including all consecutive patients with CD submitted to SBCE from January 2008 to December 2019. Small bowel patency was evaluated with patency capsule in selected patients. A conclusive procedure was defined as the one that allowed clinical decision-making. Mucosal inflammation was graded as mild (few aphtoid ulcers), moderate (multiple aphtoid ulcers/isolated deep ulcers) or severe (multiple deep ulcers/stenosis). Therapeutic impact was defined as a change in CD related treatment including escalation, de-escalation, dose adjustment or referral to surgery recommended based on SBCE results within the next 3 months after the SBCE. Patients were assigned to four groups regarding CE indication: staging, flare, post-op and remission (fig 1). Results From the 432 CE performed, 378 (87.5%) were conclusive and allowed clinical decision-making. SBCE results guided changes in 51.3% of patients: 199 (46.1%) with escalation and 23 (5.3%) with de-escalation of treatment. Active disease was present in 310 (71.8%) patients; 131 (30.3%) presented mild, 126 (29.2%) moderate and 53 (12.3%) severe activity. Disease activity demonstrated by SBCE correlated with therapeutic changes. With mild activity 24.1% increased therapy, whereas 77.8% and 84.9% increased therapy with moderate or severe disease, respectively (p&lt;0.001). De-escalation was conducted in 12.8% patients with mucosal healing and 6.1% with mild disease but not in moderate or severe activity (p&lt;0.001). Treatment before and after SBCE is shown in the table. Conclusion SBCE is a safe and useful tool when approaching established CD patients guiding therapeutic management in a real-life setting. Its positive impact does not limit to treatment escalation but also helps to de-escalate in patients who can benefit from it.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document