scholarly journals Variations in cephalic vein venography for device implantation–Relationship to success rate of lead implantation

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-12
Author(s):  
Takashi Tokano ◽  
Yuji Nakazato ◽  
Tomoyuki Shiozawa ◽  
Hirokazu Konishi ◽  
Masaru Hiki ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Paula Tagliari ◽  
Adriano Nunes Kochi ◽  
Rodrigo Petersen Saadi ◽  
Bernardo Mastella ◽  
Eduardo Keller Saadi ◽  
...  

Axillary vein puncture guided by ultrasound (US-Ax) versus cephalic vein dissection in pacemaker and defibrillator implant: a multicenter randomized clinical trial is a recently published study in which 88 patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to one of the two methods. Even being performed by operators with not previous ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture experience, this group presented a higher success rate, lower procedural time and comparable complication incidence.


Vascular ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 273-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Kulaylat ◽  
Constantine P. Karakousis

For insertion of totally implantable access ports, with the catheter end in the superior vena cava, the percutaneous (Seldinger) technique is commonly used. Of cutdowns, the cephalic vein cutdown is the most popular one (success rate about 80%), followed by the external jugular vein cutdown. Our preliminary experience suggests that internal jugular vein and basilic vein cutdowns have the anatomic features to prove both of them superior to the cephalic vein cutdown.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 661-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Varunsiri Atti ◽  
Mohit K. Turagam ◽  
Jalaj Garg ◽  
Scott Koerber ◽  
Aakash Angirekula ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Xu ◽  
Peyton Davis Card ◽  
Evan Watts ◽  
Guillermo A. Escobar ◽  
Gareth Tobler ◽  
...  

In this article we discuss two cases that highlight possible complications of cardiac device implantation. In particular, our first case involves a patient who, during implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation, sustained injuries to her subclavian artery and vein and subsequently developed a self-resolving neuropraxia of the brachial plexus. In our second case, the patient, also during ICD implantation, had his left cephalic vein nicked during cutdown. Post-op he then developed a hematoma-induced left brachial plexus injury that also eventually self-resolved. A literature search has not shown other incidences of iatrogenic brachial plexus injuries from ICD implantation as described.


2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. OP61_1
Author(s):  
Takashi Tokano ◽  
Yuji Nakazato ◽  
Sayaka Komatsu ◽  
Satoru Suwa ◽  
Kaoru Komatsu ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 541-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Buresova ◽  
Ales Vidlar ◽  
Michal Grepl ◽  
Vladimir Student ◽  
Vladimir Student

Context: Urinary incontinence is the most threatening complication after radical prostatectomy. This disorder has an important impact on the quality of life of patients and its treatment is a challenge for urologists as well. Objective: The objective of this article is to report our experience with the adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS, AMI, Austria) for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence. Material and methods: A total of 35 men with post-prostatectomy incontinence were treated. Before and after device implantation, the number of pads used per day was counted, and a one-hour pad test, uroflowmetry and postmicturition residual volume were assessed. Prior to surgery, anastomosis stricture was either ruled out or treated. To evaluate the success rate, ‘cured’ was defined as no pad use or one safety pad, ‘improved’ was defined as one or two pads or reduction of pad usage by more than 50%, respectively. All data about efficacy and safety were collected from all 35 patients. Results: After a median (range) follow-up of 21.2 (3–63) months, the success rate was 32 out of 35 patients (91.5%) with 22 patients (62.9%) ‘cured’ and 10 patients (28.6%) ‘improved’. Recovery of continence was achieved in seven patients (20.0%). The remaining patients (80%) needed an adjustment. The mean (range) number of adjustments to reach desired results (continence, improvement or patient satisfaction) was 4.3 (1–15). The most common adverse event was transient perineal pain, which was reported in 14 (40%) patients and disappeared within two weeks. Temporary urine retention appeared in one patient (2.9%). There were three cases (8.6%) of wound infection at the site of a port leading to explantation of the port in two patients (5.7%) and the removal of the system in one patient (2.9%). Conclusion: Treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence with the self-anchoring ATOMS is safe and effective.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 3284-3290 ◽  
Author(s):  
JANE TALESKI ◽  
LIDIJA POPOSKA ◽  
FILIP JANUSEVSKI ◽  
BEKIM POCESTA ◽  
VLADIMIR BOSKOV ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. S4-S5
Author(s):  
Ashok Kumar ◽  
Ashish Kumar Golwara ◽  
Ajeet Kumar Singh ◽  
Aashaq Husaain Khandy ◽  
Rajiv Bajaj

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. 841-843
Author(s):  
Olga Iorio ◽  
Sergio Gazzanelli ◽  
Giuseppe D'ermo ◽  
Angela Pezzolla ◽  
Angela Gurrado ◽  
...  

The request for totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs) has rapidly grown up through the last decades. TIVADs are implanted by direct vein puncture or by surgical approach with vein cutdown. The authors present a comparative prospective study evaluating external jugular vein (EJV) and cephalic vein cutdown techniques. Two hundred and fifteen patients were consecutively submitted to TIVAD implantation to perform chemotherapy. Patients were divided in two groups, depending on the implantation technique. Group A patients (106) underwent implantation via EJV cutdown and group B (109) patients underwent implantation by cephalic vein cut-down. The following variables were investigated: operating time, need for conversion to other approaches, complications, and intraoperative and postoperative pain. In Group A patients, the success rate of the procedure was 100 per cent, whereas in 11 patients (10.1%) of Group B, a modification of the initial approach was needed. Mean operative time was 23.9 ± 9.2 minutes in Group A and 35.4 ± 11.9 in Group B, and this was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Complication rates at 30 days were similar. Considering intraoperative pain, a difference was found between the two groups because the mean value of pain in Group Awas lower than that in Group B (4.13 ± 0.3 vs 5.22 ± 1.24), even if not significant. External jugular vein cutdown approach is quick and safe and allows a very high success rate with very low risk of complications. For these reasons, this approach could be considered as a first choice in TIVAD placement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document