scholarly journals Re: Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, et al. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008;16:137–62.

2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 1585 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Rhon
2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Zhang ◽  
R.W. Moskowitz ◽  
G. Nuki ◽  
S. Abramson ◽  
R.D. Altman ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S525-S525
Author(s):  
T. Charpeaud ◽  
A. Yrondi ◽  
W. El-Hage ◽  
M. Leboyer ◽  
E. Haffen ◽  
...  

Expert consensus guidelines rely on a relevant methodological procedure complementary to based-evidence recommendations. They aim at offering support strategies derived from expert consensus for clinical situations where the levels of evidence are either absent or insufficient. Recommendations for resistant depressive disorders proposed by french association for biological psychiatry and fondamental foundation, were based on responses from 36 highly specialized experts in this field. They were invited to complete a comprehensive questionnaire with 118 issues. The questions raised covered a wide range of aspects from the evaluation of therapeutic resistance and clinical conditions increasing the risk for treatment failure to the adopted therapeutic strategies organized according the effects of previous treatment lines. Specific populations/situations especially including elderly, comorbidities (anxiety disorders, personality disorders and addictions) were also been studied through specific questions. Such recommendations are intended to substantially help the decision and therapeutic choice of clinician implied in the management of resistant depressive disorders in everyday clinical practice. We propose in this communication to compare the results of these recommendations with the various data from the evidence-based guidelines in order to demonstrate their complementarity for the management of resistant depressive disorders.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Theofilos Karasavvidis ◽  
Michael T. Hirschmann ◽  
Nanne P. Kort ◽  
Ioannis Terzidis ◽  
Trifon Totlis

Author(s):  
Derek L. Milne

AbstractWritten guidance is part of a coherent support system for CBT supervisors, consistent with general developments in evidence-based practice. In theory, training manuals can help by specifying educational procedures and providing support materials so as to foster fidelity, expertise and effectiveness among supervisors. Supervision guidelines can help by offering supervisors the fruits of research and expert consensus. Together with related resources, such written guidance promises to empower professionals and to benefit patients. But progress with written guidance is very limited within clinical supervision, particularly in controlled research. In marked contrast, locally developed guidance appears to have been implemented successfully within pragmatic studies, a marked achievement when also contrasted with the general healthcare literature. Using eight criteria, the available supervision research is reviewed and conclusions drawn on developing written guidance so as to better fulfil its promise.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document